Main

February 01, 2010

Another Law I'll Break With Regularity

Austin-American Statesman: Police to begin ticketing for texting while driving

Austin police will begin issuing tickets today for people who text message while driving.

[...]

The ban prohibits driving while using a mobile electronic device to send a text message or e-mail, surf the Web, play a game or adjust music settings or use iPhone applications.

[...]

The citations will be a Class C misdemeanor, which carries a fine of up to $500 and can be appealed in Municipal Court.

Copyright © Mon Feb 01 16:05:42 EST 2010 All rights reserved.


Tack this onto the impressive list of perfectly moral and contextually-appropriate actions for which we'll now be held criminally responsible.

If I want to send a text, I'll do so when I think I have the safe opportunity to do so. That includes while in the driver's seat of a moving car.

The City of Austin and the Austin Police Department can suck it. I'm responsible for any wrecks, injuries, and deaths my actions may cause and no law will change that.

July 17, 2009

Brian Rodgers Needs Slaves

Speaking of equality before the law...

Austin American-Statesman: Big Austin businesses undertaxed, protesters say

About 35 protesters gathered Thursday at the offices of the Travis Central Appraisal District to allege chronic undertaxing of Austin's big businesses.

"The city has asked us to choose between wading pools and services for senior citizens," activist Brian Rodgers said, referring to proposed budget cuts, "while there's money to be collected (from) property that's missing from the tax rolls."

Rodgers analyzed sale prices and concluded that the appraisal district has underestimated the value of 30 large commercial properties in Travis County, leaving untaxed $128 million in potential property value.

As a result, he said, homeowners carry a great share of the tax burden.

Copyright 2009 The Austin American-Statesman. All Rights Reserved.


This world is doomed as long as people continue to believe in and fight for government intervention. We've traveled so far down the coercive-collectivist path that "wading pools and services for senior citizens" are part of the sundry list of goodies the state attempts to provide. Then, when the state inevitably fails to fund them to everyone's satisfaction, they are objectified as the "things are so bad that we can't even have BOTH!" type of mundane moral outrage designed to inject a little activism into apathy.

I'll assume that the figures Mr. Rodgers calculated are accurate. As with the previous entry, the essential complaint is that "someone isn't being treated the same according to law." As with the previous entry, the essential problem is that treatment is thoroughly immoral at its core and, barring other extenuating circumstances, the fewer individuals and organizations subject to that treatment, the better.

Now, I'm certainly sympathetic to the point that homeowners shouldn't be responsible for "a great share of the tax burden"...but that's because there shouldn't be a tax burden in the first place. Yes, the stench of corporate-government backroom dealing is foul. Most of us don't have that kind of access and influence; most of us would probably like less of a tax burden. I'd much rather see a growing association of businesses that tell the state to piss off rather than engage in the normalized business-state cycle of corruption.

Brian Rodgers need slaves because he wants others to fund the services he uses and thinks Austinites deserve. He wants those services so badly he wants an organization to establish a fee structure for others to pay. He wants that organization to send notice to the individuals and businesses within city limits that they have to pay these fees. If they fail to pay, they will be hauled into court. If they refuse, the organization will send people with guns to enforce the fee structure. If these people resist this enforcement, Mr. Rodgers wants these people subjected to assault, kidnapping, and theft so they are beaten into compliance or have those fees (plus additional costs for all that enforcing) taken without their permission anyway.

This is the essence of taxation and because

  • sending cops to fuck with innocent people
  • detaining the innocent in jail
  • running courts to convict the innocent
  • administering property seizures

and so on are so damn expensive, tax advocates would rather their golden goose be docile and subservient. They would rather have people (angrily, reluctantly, proudly, ignorantly) pay taxes "voluntarily" and without incident. Tax advocates want a world where people just pay up before the deadlines and get on with their lives. This way, all those awesome state services will be funded.

In other words, they want slaves to pay for their gawddamn Constitutionally-guaranteed penumbral right to a fucking pool or fucking entertainment for their elderly parents.

June 12, 2009

Noise Ordinance Complaint at Shady Grove

Austin-American Statesman: Noise complaint shuts down Unplugged at the Grove

For the first time in its 16-year existence, KGSR’s “Unplugged at the Grove” series at Shady Grove was shut down Thursday night after a noise complaint from a neighbor. Shady Grove owner Mike Young said the restaurant is in the process of applying for a variance that will allow a ceiling of 85 decibels. According to the current noise code, Shady Grove is classified as a restaurant that must comply at 75 decibels.

Thursday’s opening act Sahara Smith was in the middle of her set when Austin Police showed up with a decibel meter and ordered the show stopped. Headliner Jimmy LaFave never played in front of a crowd estimated at 600. “Unplugged” booker Marsha Milam said the complaint came from a neighbor who told Shady Grove management that he’d call the cops next week, too.

Copyright 2009 The Austin-American Statesman. All Rights Reserved.


I learned about this through a friend's Tweet. She suggested people contact the City Council and complain. Despite my libertarian issues regarding the legitimacy of noise ordinances, I still find it outrageous the government does this.

Here's what I wrote to the City Council, the first time I think I've contacted them directly:

Other than violating private property rights, the noise ordinance is giving rise to other absurdities. For example: people who, after choosing to live near or in the downtown area of a city known for its after-dark music scene, complain about the loudness of that very scene. Though the person who complained about Shady Grove is the immediate source of concern, ultimately it is the local government's imposition of the noise ordinance that should take responsibility.

Neighbors should be able to resolve their problems without calling on people with guns to shut the other side down. How about we not give them that rather violent option?

-Charles Hueter

February 16, 2009

Forgiving Student Loan Debt

...I've been wondering what the precise argument against the forgiveness of student loan debts would be. I currently have $11,000 in student loan debts, and my fiance has over $90,000 in student loan debts. Altogether, once we marry, we'll have over $100,000 in student loan debts, which is crazy. He has to pay over $600 a month for his student loans, so that's money that doesn't directly stimulate the economy aside from the loan companies themselves. And I pay over $100 a month for my own student loans since I had them consolidated before the deadline.

Having over $700 in dispensable income would be great, and that'd help boost our local economy here in Austin. Once again, why would this be so bad to have a one-time forgiveness of student loan debt?



The Facebook group that prompted this news is Cancel Student Loan Debt to Stimulate the Economy.

I just finished reading it and you'll find a remarkable lack of coherency in the action the group's creator, Robert Applebaum, desires. Take this passage for example:

Let me be clear. This is NOT about a free ride. This is about a new approach to economic stimulus, nothing more. To those who would argue that this proposal would cause the banking system to collapse or make student loans unavailable to future borrowers, please allow me to respond.

I am in no way suggesting that the lending institutions who manage such debts get legislatively shafted by having these assets wiped off their books. The banks and other financial institutions are going to get their money regardless - this proposal merely suggests that educated, hardworking Americans who are saddled with student loan debt should get something in return, rather than sending those institutions another enormous blank check. Because the banks will receive their money anyway, there would be no danger of making funds unavailable to future borrowers.


Applebaum later writes "Free us of our obligations to repay Federal Stafford Loans"...so what exactly does he mean? There can't be too many variations on this theme:
  • All (or some) loans written for the purpose of funding college education are "forgiven."
  • All (or some) state-subsidized loans written for the purpose of funding college education are "forgiven."
  • Only Stafford loans written for the purpose of funding college education are "forgiven."

Combine that with whatever the hell "forgiven" might mean:
  • The loans are simply written off and treated as a straight gift transfer to the student; i.e., no need to ever repay the remaining principle and interest.
  • The loans' remaining principle or interest is written off as a straight gift transfer to the student.
  • The loans' repayment clauses are rewritten so the student can pay as little as he or she wants for a certain time frame before the previous contractual obligations reactivate.

Any of the above can be done voluntarily by the lenders should they desire to see their loan portfolio take a vicious hit, but it's certainly possible. I bet there are banks out there in far healthier condition than the nationals who might be able to do this for specific cases, perhaps as a monthly lottery or a contest.

However, color me skeptical if you think this Applebaum guy expects this to happen without force of government.

His economic education is clearly in the shitter if he honestly thinks that "[t]here isn't an economist alive who doesn't believe that the economy needs stimulating immediately."

I have a private loan through Wells Fargo that has helped pay for the last year of my tuition at St. Edward's University. I refuse to get a loan through a federal program. I have no intention of reneging on my promise to pay and I have no sympathy for people who didn't pay attention to the language in their loan contracts. Signing a loan is as much of an attempt at informed forecasting as a COO estimating future demand for his employer's products or a CFO figuring out how much revenue to invest for future use.

Regarding the local Austin economy, where does slinkerwink think local businesses get their loans? I bet most of them originate at local banks, the very same banks that probably wrote a great deal of local Austin college loans. To be effective from the student's perspective, this "forgive" nonsense will have to involve some kind of deep loss on the lender's part, a loss that means less money for the lender to use on other deals.

The incestuous relationship between banking and the state has nearly brought the whole system to ruin and the blame can be spread far and wide on that one. Bailout mania has created awful stinking piles of - yes - "inter-generational theft"...but that doesn't mean a few hundred billion additional wrongs added to a few trillion wrongs make a right.

February 04, 2009

Austin's Government Wants $1,032,296,350 of Our Money

And not just Austin residents' money.

I didn't pay any attention when I learned the mayors lobby had produced a massive document pointing out all the wonderful things that could be done with other people's money. I knew reading it might drive me nuts so I moved on to other things.

Well, now that Drudge linked to the Wall Street Journal article pointing out that Mayor Will Wynn wants $886,000 for the "Raul Alvarez Disc Golf Course", I decided to peer deeper into the abyss. Here's some of the socialism Austin's government desires:

  1. $190,000,000 to expand Capitol Metro's MetroRail Red Line
  2. $127,500,000 for the Waller Creek Tunnel (WCT) project
  3. $80,000,000 to upgrade existing MetroRail commuter rail line
  4. $60,000,000 for more urban rail equipment
  5. $36,000,000 to replace Capitol Metro buses
  6. $25,000,000 for a Public Safety Training facility
  7. $20,000,000 for cleaning the Hornsby Bend Biosolids Facility Digester
  8. $20,000,000 to upgrade Austin ISD technology
  9. $18,000,000 to close a pedestrian/bike gap along Lady Bird Lake
  10. $15,000,000 to give poor AISD students broadband at home
  11. $13,300,000 to work on 21,000 feet of water main from Red River to UT
  12. $11,700,000 for an overflow parking lot at the airport
  13. $11,100,000 for a new Park 'n Ride facility

Those are just the ones over ten million dollars. Gotta love those nice round numbers! It indicates calm, deliberate decision-making.
John Hrncir, government-relations officer, says the project list "was put together on very short notice," and "we are not going to submit anything that is questionable when we seek actual funding."

Copyright ©2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Oh wait. No, it doesn't.

Of personal interest to me is the $500,000 requested for "Fort Branch Erosion/Flood Control Voluntary Buyouts (Demolition)." That's where I live and I damned well want to know what these people have planned for my neighborhood.

I know that the following analysis lends credence to these bullshit figures, assumes their accuracy, and might even be seen as an endorsement of the disgusting sausage-making process that is represented by local officials begging the central government to borrow (tax the future) to spend today...but whatever. I want to throw this out there.

The grand total Wynn wants cuts in a just above a billion dollars. He says sucking that money from the rest of the country (NOTE TO NEWS EDITORS: NOT "from Washington") will create 14,322.50 jobs. That half job, by the way, will come from the $175,000 requested for the Zilker Botanical Garden Trail Lighting Project. Is that supposed to be a part-time position or something?

Some basic Excel wizardry completed, here are some things to think about.

  • More than half of the projects (87 out of 162) cost at least $100,000 per each job Wynn claims they'll create.
  • The overall average direct taxpayer cost of each project would be $72,075. Of course, that doesn't factor inflation, cost overruns, delays, etc.
  • Two ($2.4m for traffic signals & $290k to renovate the Carver Museum) lack job-creation estimates and one (the $60m for rail equipment) literally says zero.
  • The most expensive project on a per-job basis is the $36m to replace and expand city buses. Wynn says this will create 15 jobs, which means each job will cost the country $2,400,000.
  • The least expensive project on a per-job basis is the $25k for demolition along Santa Rita St. Wynn says this will create 6 jobs, which means each job will cost the country $4,167.
  • The kind folks at the Census Bureau said the median yearly household income in the United States is about $50,000, which means that Wynn wants 124 projects that'll exceed that figure on a per-job basis.
Yes, I'm aware that not every penny goes towards salaries and benefits. I'm sure Home Depot, el cheapo apartment complexes, and those mobile food trucks are looking forward to this shit.

I'm also aware that most of the job-creation claimed in this document is temporary construction stuff, shoveled to well-connected civil engineering contractors. That's something I don't see mentioned often enough about these things: these aren't jobs in the sense of a proper career. Some will last a few weeks, some maybe a fiscal quarter or two. Pulling out every dusty, graft-machine-and-neighborhood-association-approved wish list item doesn't generate the kind of fundamental economic growth that stimulus proponents assume will happen. It's a layer of icing over a hollow cupcake.

Obviously, I think the entire enterprise is morally and practically bankrupt from top to bottom. Threatening police violence against tomorrow's taxpayers in Oregon, Hawaii, Houston, and Chicago to pay for AISD roofing repairs today is absurd.

Lots of "change" everywhere. The lot of it amounts to shifting decimal points.

January 06, 2009

It's Raining and I'm in a Good Mood

Largely the result of a new relationship growing into something fresh and important, this year has so far been quite nice. Other things are also well. I had a good Christmas and a special New Year's. Hopefully I can wrap up my final requirements for graduation this year and finally earn my bachelor's degree. The half-assed job I did in my classes last semester didn't taint my GPA. My half-brother lit a fire under my ass and I'm now finally brewing my own beer for the first time. More acquaintances than ever are gaming with me on Xbox Live. The last time I owned a bike was in '98 and a friend will help bankroll a replacement for me, opening up another way to exercise and new things in Austin to explore. My family's stable. Most of my friends are alive and kicking.

There are many things over which I could be gritting my teeth:

  • The property tax "receipt" sent to me by Nelda Wells Spears, the professional thief of Travis County's government.
  • The sudden death of my car stereo.
  • Obama.
  • Palestine.
  • The pack of dangerous fools attempting to rule Austin and Texas.

And all the disintegrated nonsense blaring from the news, occasionally featured on this blog.

Since September 2002, 99% of my blogging revolved around me reacting to politics and the news. I have probably written three or four "doing things differently from here on" posts over the years. None amounted to much. I'm not about to curse myself with another such promise. I cannot help the need to vent when I read about some prick threatening others with police violence for non-compliance.

However, as I cleaned up my house in anticipation of the aforementioned relationship coming over, I finally realized just how many books I've picked up over the years and - even worse - how few of them I bothered to read.

This. Will. Not. Do.

So, in conjunction with what will almost certainly be a dense year of collegiate reading, I want to own up to my book collection. I will begin by finishing issue #107 of The New Quarterly, a Canadian journal of writing. Next is a gift from my new lady friend, What Matters: The World's Preeminent Photojournalists and Thinkers Depict Essential Issues of Our Time. Browsing through the back cover, the table of contents, and the intro tells me I'll find lots of grist for disagreement. And next? Well, I never did finish Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago...then maybe on to the Akira graphic novels, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance - An Inquiry into Values, perhaps Reform and Revolution in China - The 1911 Revolution in Hunan and Hubei, all interspersed with readings from Rothbard's Libertarian Forum.

Onward!

November 14, 2008

700 Billion Reasons to Vote Democratic?

This car was parked next time mine last night.

This was displayed in the rear window.

There are a number of ways to interpret this. The three I think that are most likely are:

  • This person is against the $700 billion bailout bill proposed by Bush's Republican administration and believes a coherent strategy to fight back is to support Democratic Party candidates.
  • This person is against Bush and his plans in general and believes a coherent strategy to fight back is to support Democratic Party candidates.
  • This person blames Bush for the situation that gave rise to the need for a bailout bill and believes a coherent strategy to fight back is to support Democratic Party candidates.
There are some distinctions here worth nothing, but I think there is no doubt this person thinks more Democrats in power are the solution.

Of course, there are just 212 small problems with that.

74 Yeas, 25 Nays
  1. Akaka (D-HI)
  2. Baucus (D-MT)
  3. Bayh (D-IN)
  4. Biden (D-DE)
  5. Bingaman (D-NM)
  6. Boxer (D-CA)
  7. Brown (D-OH)
  8. Byrd (D-WV)
  9. Cardin (D-MD)
  10. Carper (D-DE)
  11. Casey (D-PA)
  12. Clinton (D-NY)
  13. Conrad (D-ND)
  14. Dodd (D-CT)
  15. Durbin (D-IL)
  16. Feinstein (D-CA)
  17. Harkin (D-IA)
  18. Inouye (D-HI)
  19. Kerry (D-MA)
  20. Klobuchar (D-MN)
  1. Kohl (D-WI)
  2. Lautenberg (D-NJ)
  3. Leahy (D-VT)
  4. Levin (D-MI)
  5. Lieberman (ID-CT)
  6. Lincoln (D-AR)
  7. McCaskill (D-MO)
  8. Menendez (D-NJ)
  9. Mikulski (D-MD)
  10. Murray (D-WA)
  11. Nelson (D-NE)
  12. Obama (D-IL)
  13. Pryor (D-AR)
  14. Reed (D-RI)
  15. Reid (D-NV)
  16. Rockefeller (D-WV)
  17. Salazar (D-CO)
  18. Schumer (D-NY)
  19. Webb (D-VA)
  20. Whitehouse (D-RI)

I still consider Lieberman a Democrat, so he counts here. That makes 40 D's voting for the bailout. Only 10 Democrats (and Sanders) voted against. You'll also notice a few Presidential candidates and other Democratic heavy-hitters in that list. From the other side, 34 Republicans voted for the bailout and 15 voted against. The bill would have died in the Senate without either party's support, but it is clear that Republican Senators were a bit more likely to vote against it than Democratic Senators.

263 Yeas, 171 Nays
  1. Abercrombie
  2. Ackerman
  3. Allen
  4. Andrews
  5. Arcuri
  6. Baca
  7. Baird
  8. Baldwin
  9. Bean
  10. Berkley
  11. Berman
  12. Berry
  13. Bishop (GA)
  14. Bishop (NY)
  15. Boren
  16. Boswell
  17. Boucher
  18. Boyd (FL)
  19. Brady (PA)
  20. Braley (IA)
  21. Brown, Corrine
  22. Capps
  23. Capuano
  24. Cardoza
  25. Carnahan
  26. Carson
  27. Clarke
  28. Cleaver
  29. Clyburn
  30. Cohen
  31. Cooper
  32. Costa
  33. Cramer
  34. Crowley
  35. Cuellar
  36. Cummings
  37. Davis (AL)
  38. Davis (CA)
  39. Davis (IL)
  40. DeGette
  41. DeLauro
  42. Dicks
  43. Dingell
  44. Donnelly
  45. Doyle
  46. Edwards (MD)
  47. Edwards (TX)
  48. Ellison
  49. Ellsworth
  50. Emanuel
  51. Engel
  52. Eshoo
  53. Etheridge
  54. Farr
  55. Fattah
  56. Foster
  57. Frank (MA)
  1. Giffords
  2. Gonzalez
  3. Gordon
  4. Green, Al
  5. Gutierrez
  6. Hall (NY)
  7. Hare
  8. Harman
  9. Hastings (FL)
  10. Higgins
  11. Hinojosa
  12. Hirono
  13. Holt
  14. Honda
  15. Hooley
  16. Hoyer
  17. Israel
  18. Jackson (IL)
  19. Jackson-Lee (TX)
  20. Johnson, E. B.
  21. Kanjorski
  22. Kennedy
  23. Kildee
  24. Kilpatrick
  25. Kind
  26. Klein (FL)
  27. Langevin
  28. Larsen (WA)
  29. Larson (CT)
  30. Lee
  31. Levin
  32. Lewis (GA)
  33. Loebsack
  34. Lofgren, Zoe
  35. Lowey
  36. Mahoney (FL)
  37. Maloney (NY)
  38. Markey
  39. Marshall
  40. Matsui
  41. McCarthy (NY)
  42. McCollum (MN)
  43. McGovern
  44. McNerney
  45. McNulty
  46. Meek (FL)
  47. Meeks (NY)
  48. Melancon
  49. Miller (NC)
  50. Miller, George
  51. Mitchell
  52. Mollohan
  53. Moore (KS)
  54. Moore (WI)
  55. Moran (VA)
  56. Murphy (CT)
  57. Murphy, Patrick
  1. Murtha
  2. Nadler
  3. Neal (MA)
  4. Oberstar
  5. Obey
  6. Olver
  7. Ortiz
  8. Pallone
  9. Pascrell
  10. Pastor
  11. Pelosi
  12. Perlmutter
  13. Pomeroy
  14. Price (NC)
  15. Rahall
  16. Rangel
  17. Reyes
  18. Richardson
  19. Ross
  20. Ruppersberger
  21. Rush
  22. Ryan (OH)
  23. Sarbanes
  24. Schakowsky
  25. Schiff
  26. Schwartz
  27. Scott (GA)
  28. Sestak
  29. Sires
  30. Skelton
  31. Slaughter
  32. Smith (WA)
  33. Snyder
  34. Solis
  35. Space
  36. Speier
  37. Spratt
  38. Sutton
  39. Tanner
  40. Tauscher
  41. Thompson (CA)
  42. Tierney
  43. Towns
  44. Tsongas
  45. Van Hollen
  46. Velázquez
  47. Wasserman Schultz
  48. Waters
  49. Watson
  50. Watt
  51. Waxman
  52. Weiner
  53. Welch (VT)
  54. Wexler
  55. Wilson (OH)
  56. Woolsey
  57. Wu
  58. Yarmuth

My, that's a lot of House Democrats. Lookit how many Important People are in that list. The final tally was 172 "yes" Democrats and 63 "no" Democrats. Republicans voted 108 to 91 against it in the House. Again, the bill couldn't have passed without Republican support, but it's clear the Democrats voted more in favor of the bill than against it.

So, 212 Democrats voted for the $700 billion bailout bill. That constitutes the vast majority of Democrats or Democrat-type congresspeople.

I was actually wrong about the ways to interpret that person's sign. There is another option, one I think is the most likely.

  • He or she is just an ignorant gawddamn partisan idiot.
This is all the more annoying because this person is right to hate, oppose, or question the wisdom of the bailout.

Unfortunately, because he or she is an ignorant gawddamn partisan idiot who wants people to vote and vote Democratic, I have no doubt that this opposition arises from the application of the the principles behind the bill rather than the principles themselves. Taxation, redistributionism, protectionism, statism...if I had sought this person out and questioned him or her regarding these ideas, the answers would have been entirely mainstream.

I bet the dumbass voted for Obama/Biden, whose names are on the Senate bailout list above.

October 02, 2008

Watch for the October 2008 INsite on Friday

There are some interesting similarities between the cover they’re using for the October issue and this picture I took last year at Maker Faire:


In fact, I’m told several pictures I took will run in the main article and the folks at Maker Faire gave the cover a thumbs up.

I'd trying to get a chance to meet the 'zine's editor, Sean Claes, to thank him for the opportunity. Yes, I was offered to "do lunch." :D

No, I'm not a sudden thousandaire and I doubt I'll be able to get anyone into parties with the cool kids, but there's no way I'm turning down my first offer to be published.

It's also a fantastic reminder to get off my ass and put more material on flickr!

September 12, 2008

Hurricane Ike

After embarrassing myself in 2005, I'll refrain from acting the meteorologist this time.

Instead, I'll just note the welcome humor from bebop717 and post this shot I took earlier this morning:

Ike's Early Clouds

September 10, 2008

The FDA Has Pasteurized Good Flow Juice

From the Austinist: What Happened to the Good Flow.

According to company co-founder Judy Crofut, Good Flow had been operating under the assumption that pasteurization—the process of heating up a liquid to kill off bacteria and molds—wasn't necessary for its products since they were handmade and delivered to neighborhood grocers in less than a day. The company had previously operated as a "juice bar," like Daily Juice, with the approval of the FDA via an exemption. That exemption was later retracted in 2006.

A much more mundane example of statism screwing things up in the name of protecting us from ourselves.

This is the kind of everyday intervention that hardly anyone considers in political debates. Government orders like these are probably imposed thousands of times a day. I have no doubt that some of the orders are legitimate - in the sense that they are issued against genuine crooks who lie to, steal from, and knowingly harm their customers. However, I also have no doubt that the vast majority of these orders are decreed on the basis of some technicality, some rule an apparatchik was tasked with fleshing out after the Sausage Factories excreted their latest shelf-bending monstrosity.

So it is basically illegal to produce unpasteurized juice. Fight it all you want within the regulatory framework and court system. As with any government rule, you will eventually run into the one thing they have that we don't: the authority to initiate violence against you and your property. The court decision is the paper threat of that aggression.

Now, an unique company that as far as I can tell has hurt and lied to no one and that produces something that people enjoy and desire has to shut down and divert scarce resources towards making Washington happy. This, on top of the time and money spent arguing with them through the system. Want to know why there seems this tendency towards big business? It's because they have an easier time dealing with shit like this than independent companies.

From News8Austin: FDA shuts down Good Flow Juice Co.

"There's a warning label -- you have the option to drink it or not -- that it's not pasteurized juice," Joshua Bingaman of Progress Coffee said.

Good Flow's owners said pasteurization breaks down vitamins and healthy bacteria.

Copyright ©2008TWEAN News Channel of Austin, L.P. d.b.a. News 8 Austin


I've had it before and I liked what I tasted. It certainly puts anything by Minute Maid or Tropicana to shame, despite their advantage in price per volume.

The public health angle is the common argument and I reject it categorically.

People with like mdahmus are part of the problem. A plea for personal responsibility, consumer choice, product diversity, and individual freedom is met with snark and a turned-off mind gripped with an misplaced sense of morality.

Did Good Flow kill anyone with their juices? Did Good Flow give the impression on their packaging that they pasteurized their juice?

Even if the answers to those questions are Yes and Yes, it does not automatically mean they ought to be forced to stop production and it does not by any measure mean the state is the proper entity to react. Those with grievances are the victims and it is they who should be dealing with the company. Among countless other examples, I certainly don't want part of my wealth forced from me and into the process of pushing around Good Flow.

So, yeah. Fuck the FDA:
Zero Sympathy for Teresa Nielsen Hayden
Chiggers, FDA, and Market Intervention

August 08, 2008

Screwing with Bethany Lutheran Church's Right to Sell

Austin-American Statesman: Church's plans to sell land for apartments upsets neighbors

...Bethany Lutheran Church sought city approval for 272 apartments to be built on part of its Southwest Austin campus...some neighbors are protesting and threatening to sue to stop the project, saying that the church, which plans to sell the land to a private developer, should be required to use the normal zoning process..."We want to make sure that any development on this property complies with all water quality and land-use requirements."...annex more than 13,000 acres that year and apply its environmental regulations, including the SOS ordinance, to development on that land...church was required to upgrade its water quality pond to SOS standards..."You couldn't build anything on the land because by the time you did the re-irrigation and water quality retention pond, there was no building space left."...the land was never zoned in the first place...the City Council wasn't required to hold public hearings...city will not require the water quality controls on the site to meet SOS standards, but the church will have to enlarge...begin irrigating...harvest some runoff...new deal eliminated two retail or office sites...number of units that can be built on that land was reduced...the height of the buildings was reduced...neighbors still upset with the deal and how it was handled have formed a nonprofit called the Oak Parke Brodie Wild Preservation Group...any development on the church's site, which is in the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone, to adhere to SOS requirements..."The church couldn't sell their land."

Copyright 2008 The Austin American-Statesman. All rights reserved.


It is amazing to me that anyone can get anything done in this city. The above is a sample of the rigmarole voters, politicians, and city "planners" have thrown up in the face of people wanting to do conduct their business.

This kind of shit - the endemic, rampant, and almost universally ignored category of property rights violations known as "local law" - is vastly more responsible for economic sluggishness than the increasing cost of oil, sub-par graduates from the Public Education Machine, and other common targets.

October 19, 2007

"www.governmentisgood.com"

Well, in that case, I hope you get what you ask for.

Good and hard.

More later.

But not before I return with tons of pictures from the Maker Faire this weekend.

I do have priorities, ya know.

June 08, 2007

Was Kevin Alexander Brown Murdered?

[Updates below.]

I think it is too early to tell, but when it appears that a cop shoots you twice in the back as you run away, that conclusion seems hard to avoid. Even if Mr. Brown had a gun (the allegation that lead APD Sergeant Michael Olsen to ask him questions and one I've seen little substantive proof for) and given the fact that he ran from the cops, that still doesn't seem to jive with the usual "imminent danger to life and limb" that deadly force legally needs before it can be employed.

I drive near Chester's nightclub every day and at night on the weekends it can get fairly boisterous. Not a good place to bring a gun of your own.

UPDATED 8/10/2007 1:08pm
News8Austin: Officer cleared in Brown shooting

A Travis County grand jury no-billed an Austin police officer who shot and killed a man outside an East Austin nightclub on June 3.

Sgt. Michael Olsen won't be held criminally responsible for the death of 25-year-old Kevin Brown.

The grand jury had to decide whether his use of force was a reasonable act of self-defense. They heard 10 days of evidence and testimony from 12 witnesses, including seven civilians, four expert or law enforcement witnesses and Olsen.


This was one of the cases I thought I might have had a chance to review as a juror.
Brown was shot twice in the back during a chase with police. The incident happened at the Elm Ridge Apartments on East 12th Street, not far from Chester's, the club where the chase actually began.

Olsen had been investigating whether the 25-year-old had a gun.

Copyright ©2007TWEAN News Channel of Austin, L.P. d.b.a. News 8 Austin


This is the part that still gets me: twice in the back. Not exactly a "he's coming right for me!" scenario.

From the Austin-American Statesman: Officer not indicted in fatal shooting

According to his written statement released Thursday, Olsen told investigators hours after the shooting that he was "100 percent sure" Brown had a gun when he shot him during a foot chase. He said he decided to shoot when he saw Brown reach toward his waistband as if retrieving a weapon and that "I was confident I had a clear shot and a high probability of hitting the target."

Olsen said he fired several rounds, that Brown fell facedown and continued reaching around his waist.

"I still felt threatened by his actions and thought he was still trying to get the gun out," Olsen said. "I paused and hesitated, especially because he was facedown and on the ground, before making the decision to shoot several more rounds to ensure I ended the threat.

"I remember thinking that I really didn't want to shoot him again, but that I still felt he was trying to get a gun and was still a threat to my life," Olsen said in his statement.


This is new info for me. As you'll see below, we aren't talking about long distances here. Shot to the ground and then shot again?
Investigators questioned dozens of people about the incident, but none said they saw Olsen fire the shots. Police later recovered a gun in the courtyard, about 30 feet from Brown's body.

[...]

According to Olsen's statement, he had just finished a traffic stop on East 12th Street, almost directly in front of Chester's, when a club security guard flagged him down about 4 a.m. and told him that a patron had reported being threatened.

Olsen said the guard told him that the customer thought the man had a weapon. The security guard initially described a possible suspect, but later told Olsen that the first man had handed a gun to another patron, later identified as Brown.

Olsen said he walked toward Brown, who then "stepped back away from me. At that point, I had a distinct gut feeling something was wrong and the hair on the back of my neck stood up."

Olsen said he decided to go "hands on" and tried to grab Brown's hands. He said Brown stepped back, pushed him and started to run.

"Had I known I was just arresting him for drugs or something, I would have just wrapped him up and tackled him," Olsen said. "Because I thought he had a gun, I was more hesitant and was trying to keep an eye on his hands."

Olsen said Brown ran toward the back of the parking lot and that he radioed a description of Brown to other officers in the area. He said Brown plunged down a large drop-off and ran into an apartment complex courtyard.

Olsen said he yelled several times at Brown to stop and show his hands, but that Brown kept his hands in his waistband area.

"After a short distance, he slowed and turned slightly towards me, looking directly at me," Olsen said in the statement. "I don't remember exactly how far he turned his body towards me, but it was coming towards me, and his head was turned towards me, looking at me.

"He was clearly digging his hand into his waistband, and I feared he was trying to pull the gun on me. ... I feared for my life and made the decision to shoot him to defend myself from imminent attack."

According to the autopsy report, the bullets entered Brown's body midback on the right side, and travelled from the back of his body to the front, right to left, and down. The bullets entered on the right side and fractured three of Brown's left ribs.


You can look at the scene from Google Maps. The Statesman posted an image of their recreation of the event and I've resized it for this post::


So far, I haven't read anything about what Olsen's partner Ivan Ramos did after Step 6 in that diagram. Did he just stop running?

The district attorney's office Thursday released copies of hundreds of pages of witnesses' statements, diagrams and other documents in the case. The information provides a more specific accounting of what happened minutes before and after the shooting.

Copyright 2007 The Austin American-Statesman. All rights reserved.


I'd like to see this stuff posted on Earle's DA website because I want to read the raw data, not filtered through a news agency.

Do I think, after knowing what I know now, that Michael Olsen murdered Kevin Brown? I haven't read anywhere that Olsen actually saw Brown in possession of a gun. He acted suspiciously and ran from the police, but that doesn't necessarily mean he had a firearm. I also haven't read anywhere (as of 1pm of today's update) that Brown's fingerprints were found on the.22 pistol dropped at the scene; fingerprints weren't even mentioned in any AAS articles. Seems very pertinent to me and no matter how coincidental it may be for a pistol to be laying around, this needs to be made clear. I also think Olsen could have closed the distance between him and Brown (at least as shown in the diagram) without firing "several" (another detail I've not seen explained: how many times did Olsen shoot?) times at Brown...who not only had an apartment building right behind him, but there were several windows through which Olsen's bullets could have easily gone.

The situation stinks (and it isn't the first time Olsen's been in use-of-force trouble), but I wouldn't rise to call it murder until something else pops up.

June 07, 2007

The Las Manitas Loan

News8Austin: City gives Las Manitas $750,000 forgivable loan

Of course, if you went to every resident in Austin and asked them why they gave the restaurant hundreds of thousands of dollars, they'd give you a blank stare and ask what the hell you were talking about. "We" did no such thing. I realize news organizations have space and time requirements to keep in mind when publishing, but this stuff bugs the hell out of me.

Las Manitas restaurant will get the money needed to relocate, remodel and stay in downtown Austin.

Austin City Council members voted Thursday to grant the owners, Cynthia and Lydia Perez, a $750,000 forgivable loan that does not have to be repaid if certain requirements are met for a set time period.

Copyright ©2007TWEAN News Channel of Austin, L.P. d.b.a. News 8 Austin


I am occasionally asked by friends and family why I don't bother running for office to combat the things I dislike in government. Well, if I did (or was elected), I'd have no choice but to call this entire enterprise local bullshit community-pandering socialist meddling of the lamest order.

Or something like that.

I don't care if an Austin Institution With Decades Of Dedicated Community Ties To The Local Art/Food/Music Scene is about to be bought out and converted to a Mega McDonalds. When a government pulls shit like this, I see nothing but a lightly disguised cash transfer from individuals to the owners of Las Manitas, a cash transfer that could not have occurred without the threat of (and examples of actually applied) police violence to those who did not want to "contribute their fair share," as the fraudulently disingenuous sometimes say. Theft is not OK and that doesn't change when the funds would be used to benefit beloved local businesses.

To their credit, there were two city council members who voted against the loan: Sheryl Cole and Lee Leffingwell. Also to their credit, a slim majority of poll-takers agree with me and don't think the restaurant should have received anything.

March 18, 2007

Some Pictures from SXSW 2007

I attended more South by Southwest-related events this year than any other. This is hardly exhaustive of the music I wanted to hear. However, I'd need to take the week off and pay for the level of access I'd require to get that much out of the festival. In fact, it's a bit of a recurring spring break goal of mine.

Here's the essential breakdown:

Continue reading "Some Pictures from SXSW 2007" »

February 18, 2007

Austin's Gay Marriages

I'm aware that there are actual, specific, legitimate benefits that gay couples are actively prohibited by law from enjoying. I'm aware that there is at least a little value (even if purely symbolic) in having the prevailing legal authority in your community recognize (and not persecute) your relationship. Gay people have my sympathies and I wish they'd be left alone...just as I wish blacks, Muslims, bosses, and other disregarded classes should be free from being bothered for no reason other than by virtue of which class to which they belong.

That said, I cannot help but be a bit dismayed when I hear of homosexuals almost begging for the state to approve of them even though I think their civil disobedience is admirable.

February 11, 2007

Representative Wayne Smith is a Petty Tyrant

The AP via ABC News: Texas Could Punish 'Truant' Parents

Parents beware: Miss a meeting with your child's teacher and it could cost you a $500 fine and a criminal record.

A Republican state lawmaker from Baytown has filed a bill that would charge parents of public school students with a misdemeanor and fine them for playing hooky from a scheduled parent-teacher conference.

Rep. Wayne Smith said Wednesday he wants to get parents involved in their child's education.

"I think it helps the kids for the parents and teachers to communicate. That's all the intent was," Smith said.

Copyright � 2007 ABCNews Internet Ventures


He's a tyrant because he has a vision and he is willing to use the force of the state to impose it upon us. He's petty because not only is this none of his business, but he's using the standard bullshit political escape clause almost everyone employs when their intrusive legislation is exposed: "I have good intentions so you really shouldn't be angry with me." Thankfully, the article mentions more skepticism and opposition to HB 557 than support so it might not go anywhere.

Thanks for the pointer, Lisa.

January 28, 2007

The Crumbling of the Word-Reality Connection Moves Along

There is an error in the following title. See if you can find it.

Austin-American Statesman: Homeowners will have four months, not two, to fix private sewer lines

If you can't see it, perhaps a dab of extra context might reveal it.

The City of Austin has extended the deadline by which homeowners must fix faulty sewer lines.

Beginning this year, the city will require an estimated 10,000 homeowners to fix private, defective sewer lines on private property that connect homes to city sewer pipes at the street.

The city will inspect the private lines for flaws and notify homeowners by mail of any repairs that need to be made.

The Austin Water Utility had proposed giving homeowners two months from the date of the letter to make repairs. But the City Council voted Thursday to give homeowners four months instead.

Copyright 2001-2007 Cox Texas Newspapers, L.P. All rights reserved.


That should do the trick. If not, then how about a little bit more:
Residents who refuse to make the repairs could be charged with a Class C misdemeanor, which carries a fine of up to $500.

An extra layer of give-it-away icing: this is largely the result of the EPA threatening to impose daily fines on Austin (probably the local government, which really means individual citizens) for not fixing the lines.

So, what's the error?

If these lines were actually "private," then not only would these government entities be laughed out of the papers for attempting to impose their will on the owners of these lines, I'd expect the article to be written from the semi-comedic "these stupid know-nothings" standpoint of a John Kelso rather than treated with any seriousness in a regional newspaper.

January 21, 2007

I'm Sure It Does, Mr. Limmer

The wording the Austin-American Statesman used on its front page to link to an article about Williamson County commissioner Frankie Limmer and how several of his choices as a commissioner have positively affected his wealth and financial prospects:

Williamson official says criticism over land deals kills desire for public service

January 17, 2007

Austin's Snow Day(s)

This place gets hilarious when cold weather arrives. What wouldn't give an Ontarian pause has generally shut down this city and driven folks inside. Digging the days off, though. Kinda like the vacation time I didn't have over the holidays. :)

UPDATED 1/21/2007 2:45pm
Even though the freeze was wimpy by my standards, it did provide some chance to take pictures...

Continue reading "Austin's Snow Day(s)" »

January 12, 2007

The Division of Labor in Government

Austin-American Statesman's Postcards from the Lege: Smokin' and bloggin'

The anti-smoking amendment came from Rep. Dennis Bonnen, R-Angleton, but not before he conceded he won't be telling Rep. Terri Hodge, D-Dalllas, to put out her stogie.

Asked if he'd take an amendment to likewise rule out chewing tobacco, Bonnen asked Houston Rep. Harold Dutton: "Who's your deskmate?"

"Well," Dutton allowed, Rep. Jessica Farrar, D-Houston. "But she stopped."

Bonnen said: "It sounds like you were able to solve your problem on your own."

Dutton inveighed: "Are you going to be the one to tell Terri Hodge that she can't smoke in the lounge? If she's in the lounge smoking, what are you doing to do?"

Bonnen said: "What do you mean what am I going to do? That's what sergeants are for," a reference to the sergeants-at-arms that patrol the floor.

Copyright 2001-2007 Cox Texas Newspapers, L.P. All rights reserved.


Right there is one of the central frauds of statism. Legislators want to change the way people behave but rather than convince them peacefully through logic and reason, they choose to issue commands backed up with threats of force from cops.

Political Agendas, Mentioned and Not

Austin-American Statesman: Electric car dealerships appearing in Austin

[T]he City of Austin has budgeted about $1 million for a campaign to convince auto manufacturers that a market exists in the United States for electric cars and to urge their mass production, said Ed Clark, a spokesman for Austin Energy.

"The goal is to get a plug-in hybrid for all types of travel that not only gives you less pollution, but also gives reliability and range," Clark said.

Copyright 2001-2007 Cox Texas Newspapers, L.P. All rights reserved.


A million bucks of taxpayer money allocated to persuade car companies to build electric vehicles. Did anyone in Austin hear about this project from someone seeking elected office? Was this an item on anyone's agenda to accomplish if they won the race? Were the voters made aware that one or some of their candidates were seeking to spend tax money on this?

This is both an honest and rhetorical question. Honest, because a million bucks isn't something to be shrugged off and for those folks who do vote and want to know this stuff, it should be out there for them. Also because I find it darkly ironic that a government entity wants to use money that doesn't belong to them to convince companies a substantial market demand exists for a product. The economic implications alone would be humorous if not so subtly destructive.

Rhetorical, because I already know part of the reason: a vote for a candidate is a vote stripped of context and preferences. Casting a vote for a candidate doesn't enact a well-defined and concrete set of policies, it puts into power human beings who can and will change their minds, allow themselves to be paid off, and make decisions at the critical margin where diverse interests operate and attempt to influence the outcome. The end result are people who lay claim to a "mandate from the community" but aren't legally or physically beholden to either the claims they make or the values and desires of those who voted for them.

January 11, 2007

The Statesman's "Who's Who" List of 2007

Austin-American Statesman: Who's who in 2007 - A look at a few notables worth watching this year

Gordon Brown, Chancellor of the Exchequer, Great Britain
Vladimir Putin's successor, Russia
Segolene Royal, Socialist Party leader, France
Muqtada al-Sadr, Shiite cleric, Iraq
Tariq al-Hashemi, Vice president, Iraq
Mahmoud Abbas, President, Palestinian Authority
Hassan Nasrallah, Leader of Hezbollah, Lebanon
Ami Ayalon, Politician and peace activist & former admiral, Israel
Mohammad Ali Alabbar, Tycoon and visionary, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Felipe Calderon, President, Mexico
Hugo Chavez, President, Venezuela
Fidel Castro, President, Cuba
Joaquin 'El Chapo' Guzman, Drug cartel leader, Mexico
Ban Ki-Moon, U.N. secretary-general, South Korea
Muhammad Yunus, Founder and director of Grameen Bank, Bangladesh
Shinzo Abe, Prime minister, Japan
Margaret Chan, Director-general of the World Health Organization, Hong Kong
Zackie Achmat, AIDS activist, South Africa
Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, President, Liberia

Good gawd, what a generally depressing list of characters. They're despots, despots-to-be, or soon-to-be-ex-despots; hopelessly overwhelmed leaders tasked by swaths of society to defuse long-standing conflicts or fix looming national and regional emergencies; or deal-swindling criminals working with the tacit approval of corrupt governments.

January 07, 2007

The Pirates of Northcross

News8Austin: Lawsuit will try to stop Northcross Wal-Mart

It's the new way to conduct business: if you don't like what someone is doing, SUE'EM!

Superficially civilized, but that's because those bringing the suit aren't the ones who'll get their hands dirty enforcing it.

September 21, 2005

Hurricane Rita Will Hit Texas, Her Remnants Will Hit Austin

[Updates below.]

...and she'll screw up my plans for the weekend. I had wanted to apply the finish to my newly stained computer desk on Saturday and Sunday, but given the current projections from the National Hurricane Center, I doubt that will be the time to be out on my front porch.

I am just to the left of the second hash mark indicated after Rita makes the projected landfall.

I predict this will significantly affect the Austin City Limits Festival. It's supposed to go from the 23rd through the 25th and Hurricane Rita is projected to be already over the state early Saturday. I didn't buy a ticket because they cost more than the bands I wanted to see. Some people recently bought tickets at hefty prices; what do they think now?

Hotels are fully booked from the influx of ACL Festers, Katrina evacuees, and Rita evacuees. Austin school districts are preparing shelters. Texas National Guardsmen are being called up. Jane Greig has some preparedness tips. The extended forcast is for rain on Saturday. The National Weather Service is saying:

SATELLITE IMAGES INDICATE THAT THE CLOUD
PATTERN IS TYPICAL OF AN INTENSE HURRICANE WITH A CLEAR EYE
SURROUNDED BY VERY DEEP CONVECTION...

...THE ENVIRONMENT IS CONDUCIVE FOR STRENGTHENING AND RITA...AS KATRINA DID...WILL BE CROSSING THE LOOPCURRENT OR AN AREA OF HIGH HEAT CONTENT WITHIN THE NEXT 12 HOURS OR SO. THIS WOULD AID THE INTENSIFICATION PROCESS. THEREAFTER...THEINTENSITY WILL BE CONTROLLED BY CHANGES IN THE EYEWALL WHICH ARE DIFFICULT TO PREDICT. THE HEAT CONTENT IN THE WESTERN GULF OF MEXICO IS NOT AS FAVORABLE AS IN THE AREA OF THE LOOP CURRENT SO SLIGHT WEAKENING IS ANTICIPATED....BUT RITA IS EXPECTED TO MAKE LANDFALL AS A MAJOR HURRICANE...AT LEAST CATEGORY THREE...

...THE OFFICIAL FORECAST IS VERY CLOSE TO THE MODEL CONSENSUS AND HAS NOT CHANGED FROM THE PREVIOUS FORECAST...

...A HURRICANE WATCH WILL LIKELY BE ISSUED LATER THIS AFTERNOON OR
TONIGHT.


More:
IT WOULD NOT BE A SURPRISE IF RITA BECAME A CATEGORY FIVE HURRICANE IN THE NEXT 24 HR BEFORE WEAKENING SOMEWHAT DUE TO A CONCENTRIC EYEWALL CYCLE OR THE
LOWER OCEAN HEAT CONTENT WEST OF THE LOOP CURRENT. RITA SHOULD
MAINTAIN MAJOR HURRICANE STATUS UNTIL LANDFALL...THEN WEAKEN AFTER
LANDFALL.

Continue reading "Hurricane Rita Will Hit Texas, Her Remnants Will Hit Austin" »