« Jerome a Paris Needs Slaves | Main | Rick Perry Wants to Protect Property Rights? »

False Dilemmas in Bank Nationalization

Nationalization is a hard sell politically. Small government, free-market types naturally have a problem with the Feds coming in and taking over stuff. But counterintuitive though it may be, overt nationalization is more consistent with the principles of a free market than covert government subsidy. Real capitalists nationalize.
I don't know a damn thing about Steve Randy Waldman, but he doesn't know a damn thing about "real capitalists" so I suppose that balances things out.

A real capitalist would hopefully, by this late stage in the game, be telling all involved to fuck off and leave his and his clients' property alone. No TARP. No bailout. No asset seizure. No taxes. No SEC. No legal tender laws. No state. No matter what professional liars say would be the projected harm to "our" economy: no violation of basic principles.

How's that for a third way?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.drizzten.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.fcgi/205

NOTICE
Comments will be held for moderation so they won't show up immediately. Please be patient.

By commenting here, you take responsiblity for what you write. Any grievances with what is posted in my comments should be directed to the person who wrote them, and that is not necessarily me.

I reserve the right to delete any comment I wish as this is my property you are commenting upon, but I'm pretty laid-back so it isn't likely to happen unless you are some psycho idiot jerk. Oh, and unless you have my permission to promote your good or service, you are wasting your time: unsolicited advertisements will result in comment deletion and URL banning. This blog ain't for you spammers or the crap you want to sell.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)