The Constitution Isn't Necessary for Freedom of Speech
'Cop Killer' was a protest record man. It was a record of anger and some people didn't understand it, but alot of people really heard that fuckin record and they knew what I was singing about. That's what the record was for, ya know. I didn't need people to come in and really back me on the First Amendment. I needed people to come in and say 'Ice-T has grounds to make this record.' I have the right to make it because the cops are killing my people. So fuck the First Amendment, let's deal with the fact that I have the right to make it. I think that people who are backers of the First Amendment and anti-censorship have to realize that when you jump on the First Amendment, what you're doing is trying to use the system's tool, the Constitution, to defend you. We need to just get away from that and just say, 'Yo, I can make this record because I have grounds to make this record. I have human rights, so fuck the First Amendment, we have human rights to speak. I don't need your Constitution to give me that right.' As long as you use their laws, they'll twist that law against you. I think that sooner-or-later we've gotta realize that this Constitution is something that can be bended, folded, spindled and mutilated to serve their system. We have to turn it around and say, 'Yo, we don't need the Constitution.' I think that's the new way we should go about our speech instead of using them, because they'll always get us with that First Amendment. They'll twist it and say, 'well, it didn't mean this.' You don't need any law to let you say that. That's a much stronger grounds to speech.
Though he doesn't mention it, private property and free exchange are the legitimate grounds upon which any individual has the right to make a record. This, despite it's in-your-face clarity on the issue, is fatally compromised because it is incorporated into the state and as such was instantly corrupted by the system.
Comments
I know you don't believe in God but I believe that God gives us the ability for something akin to freedom of speech. It's hard wired into us.
It doesn't make all speech good. But it does give us the ability to discern good speech from bad speech.
A "right" is what you have when you are on a deserted island all by your lonesome.
Posted by: somasoul | March 20, 2008 12:09 PM
Somasoul, I think you have it entirely backwards in regards to your last sentence.
A right loses its utility in the deserted island scenario because there is no one else around. It still metaphysically exists, but it doesn't actually matter because there isn't anyone else who could violate or respect it. Without other rights-bearing entities around, there isn't any point in asserting one's right to life or freedom of speech, nor are there compelling reasons to assert the rights of others. Rights are not necessary in the case of the individual on a deserted island.
Posted by: drizzten | March 22, 2008 02:08 PM