« Pat Buchanan's Implicit Argument for Anarchy | Main | Stephen Brown's Broken Window »

Deadline for the Austin Smoking Ordinance

Austin-American Statesman: It's last call for smokers

At 12:01 a.m. Thursday, city's ban will embrace almost all establishments.

Across Austin this week - and just outside it - restaurants and bars, bowling alleys and pool halls are bracing for the impact of the smoking ban that voters narrowly approved in May. Ashtrays will go the way of spittoons. Nonprofits are bolstering their quit-smoking resources. And a handful of area joints that are exempt from the ban are opening their doors a little wider to draw in smokers.


A fine of up to two thousand dollars for smoking in a "public place." I get so gawddamn angry every time I visit this subject.

Full text here, but the Amlegal.com website never consistently works, so either be patient if you want to read the details of this particular invasion of freedom or download the ordinance text here. The Health and Human Services Department has two PDFs to read: a FAQ and the results of a Q&A community meeting. The bloody details are in there.

Everything I've written relating to the Austin smoking bans, in reverse order:

  1. Yeah, We'll Just All Talk It Over
  2. The Additional Tyranny - The New Austin Smoking Ban Passes
  3. Austin Smoking Ban Hits the News
  4. "This is beginning to feel like persecution."
  5. Fight the Austin Smoking Ban
  6. Austin Smoking Ban in Effect Today
  7. The People vs. The Tobacco Industry
  8. Austin's Smoking Ban, Revisited
  9. Austin Smoking Ban Update
  10. Why Society Must Change First III
  11. Individual Rights & Collective Rights: Smoking
  12. Austin Smoking Ban Passes
  13. Austin Smoking Ban Considered Today
  14. Austin Smoking Ban Finale
  15. Austin Smoking Ban Passes, Kinda
  16. Chirac to Smoking Frogs: No More!
  17. Austin Considers a Smoking Ban

No matter what political inclination I've had over the years, I have always opposed smoking bans. I've always thought if you don't like the atmosphere in a building, it is your duty to decide if staying there is worth it. You cannot convince me you have "no choice" in this matter. You willingly entered, did you not? This goes just as strongly for those who work at pubs, clubs, bars, restaurants, bowling alleys, and anywhere else that allows smoking inside.

These are your values, people. It's your duty to rank and weigh them against each other.

Each time I walk into Beerland, I acknowledge and understand I'm entering an enclosed environment with lots of smokers inside. But because I value the entertainment and culture inside more than the short-term exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke, I choose to endure the drawbacks. This process is absolutely no different from:

  • picking a route to drive to work (distance vs speed vs traffic vs food on the way vs etc.)
  • choosing a car (fuel efficiency vs looks vs cost vs fun vs etc.)
  • deciding on your investments (short-term gains vs long-term stability vs liquidity vs tax advantages vs etc.)

These are your values and those 34,197 sonsofbitches that voted for the ordinance have decided they have the authority and the right to impose their values on you. This cartoon does as good a job as any other in explaining the vast disconnect at play here.
And if you're allergic to smoke, you might want to avoid City Hall. Some opponents of the ban - especially some bar owners who fret that the onus is on them, not smokers, to keep up a smoke-free atmosphere - are planning to light up on the steps and leave Mayor Will Wynn or City Manager Toby Futrell - "the proprietors" - facing a smoking complaint.

The commercial property owners are right to worry about getting saddled with the bulk of the problems. They have fixed assets that have been thoroughly licensed, regulated, and inspected by the local government. The City of Austin may, under this ordinance, "suspend or revoke a permit or license issued to the operator of a public place or workplace where a violation of this chapter occurs." That puts the bars and clubs over the barrel. It's much easier to nail them for violating the ban than individuals.
"We're not going to be patrolling the streets," [David Lurie, director of the Austin-Travis County Health and Human Services Department] said. The process will be "complaint-driven" by calls to the environmental and consumer health services line, 972-5600. He said people should not call 911 to report smoking violations.

"As we get complaints we'll be reviewing those," Lurie said. "If we have patterns of noncompliance, we'll take further action."

He said establishments and proprietors are more likely to be the subject of enforcement action than individual smokers.


This is deliberately targeting the things we value in order to hold is hostage to that fabulous arbiter of everything good: the Community...the Consensus...the Collective. I am not kidding when I say the first and most important step towards tyranny is when you discard the individual in favor of the group.
Most studies point out little, if any, negative impact to business from smoking bans.

This is absolutely irrelevant. The Keep Austin Free advocates and supporters should have abandoned this argument, should have never used it. It turns a debate on right and wrong into a debate on who has the best supporting study. They are correct in saying there will be bad consequences from the regulation, but their opponents can simply counter with, "but what's more important than our health!" It's a wasted effort.

Focusing on their right to use their property as they see fit would have been the better choice. Explain that it is wrong to initiate force or to threaten it against those who have not aggressed against another. Point out the guiding philosophy of the ordinance: the government decides in which aspects you own yourself and you own your property.

About the only places left for smokers are bingo halls and fraternal organizations, which were left off the ballot, and a handful of restaurants whose permits were grandfathered in because of their special filtration systems.

This is a clear-cut example of the fucking hypocrisy at work here. The power of the voters who frequent bingo halls and fraternal organizations got them an exemption, while everyone else gets screwed.

The business with the grandfathered exemptions are:


Here's a bit at the end of the Statesman article that just infuriates me:
On Thursday, the mayor declared September to be Support Austin's Nightlife Month.

Copyright 2001-2005 Cox Texas Newspapers, L.P. All rights reserved.


Gee, THANKS! Now that the blessings of the Mayor of Austin have been bestowed upon an industry he has utterly no responsibility in creating and maintaining, perhaps it might overcome the multiple roadblocks he and his government have thrown in the nightlife industry's path.

Motherfucker.

NOTICE
Comments will be held for moderation so they won't show up immediately. Please be patient.

By commenting here, you take responsiblity for what you write. Any grievances with what is posted in my comments should be directed to the person who wrote them, and that is not necessarily me.

I reserve the right to delete any comment I wish as this is my property you are commenting upon, but I'm pretty laid-back so it isn't likely to happen unless you are some psycho idiot jerk. Oh, and unless you have my permission to promote your good or service, you are wasting your time: unsolicited advertisements will result in comment deletion and URL banning. This blog ain't for you spammers or the crap you want to sell.

Comments

Reminds be of the story I heard years ago when the German version of the DEA announced a crack down on pot smokers in their restaurants.

Pot smokers called a "Smoke in" and everyone went to their favorite pub and lit up. The cops gave up.

Any ideas?

The primary problem is finding some "enclosed public place" to smoke in whose owner can handle the legal shit thrown his way. Some Austin nightclubs are wealthy enough to take it, but they aren't the oppositional type. The scrappy ones are the businesses hanging on by the edge of Saturday night's beer sales...and they have years of effort and culture to loose. If a warehouse fitting the EPP definition could be temporarily leased or purchased, a smoke-in could be staged with a few hundred of Austin's finest hipsters, punks, cigar afficionados, and anti-authoritarians. The cops aren't going to haul everyone away, but if the location has no licenses to loose and enough donations to keep paying the fines, perhaps we could openly thumb our noses at the entire affair.

The idea about smoking at the Capitol is one I hadn't considered. Violating the ordinance in places the regulation's authors never considered might expose to the public a degree of the stupidity we see in this.

Or perhaps the individuals in this city will continue to slumber until three newcomers to the University of Texas get creamed in the street by a driver who didn't see them because he didn't expect to see darkly-dressed smokers hanging out in the right lane of a 40MPH road.

I am writing a research paper for my English class about the smoking ban in austin. This website is very useful. i had no idea that the smoking ban crap has been going on for so long. I thought it was some new stupid idea. i do not agree with the smoking ban, and i am a nonsmoker. several of my friends are smokers and its stupid that they cannot have a drink and smoke at the same time. I dotn mind them smoking, i dotn care if people around me are smokig, i choose my environment. if you do like it, then leave. thats what i think. thanks for the info, i will definitly be using this site as a source. thank you, elizabeth