« "This is beginning to feel like persecution." | Main | Get Outta the Club »

Rothbard on the Medium of Exchange

It has generally been found, on the free market, that the best commodities for use as a money have been the precious metals, gold and silver.

- Murray Rothbard, The Ethics of Liberty, page 37, 1998 edition

I must admit upfront that my knowledge of monetary history is very weak and I can't contradict what he says here. However, can it really be said that a "free market" has existed in any substantial form for any substantial length of time, especially considering the historical context? The gold standard is long gone from regular use; he can only be referring to events prior to, say for simplicity, 1900. Were there free markets during those imperialistic, feudal, colonialistic times and did the de facto establishment of gold, silver, etc. as the medium of exchange during these times therefore represent a "free market vetting" so to speak of the medium? I find this particularly interesting given his defintion of a free market on page 40:
The free market is a society of voluntary and consequently mutually beneficial exchanges of ownership titles between specialized producers.
Emphasis in original.

Certainly the mercantilist era can't qualify as an example of this concept of free market, correct?

An inquiring mind wants to know. Reading suggestions (I'm aware of - but have not read - Rothbard's Man, Economy, State and What Has Government Done to Our Money?), historical evidence, pure conjecture, and theories are welcome.

Posted by drizzten on March 1, 2005 07:10 PM |

NOTICE
Comments will be held for moderation so they won't show up immediately. Please be patient.

By commenting here, you take responsiblity for what you write. Any grievances with what is posted in my comments should be directed to the person who wrote them, and that is not necessarily me.

I reserve the right to delete any comment I wish as this is my property you are commenting upon, but I'm pretty laid-back so it isn't likely to happen unless you are some psycho idiot jerk. Oh, and unless you have my permission to promote your good or service, you are wasting your time: unsolicited advertisements will result in comment deletion and URL banning. This blog ain't for you spammers or the crap you want to sell.

Comments

The regression theorem of Ludwig von Mises proves that money must originate from free market activity. Gold emerged as money long before the 1900. The first coins of precious metal are believed to have originated around 700 BC. Prior to that, metal bars, and other pieces of metal were used.

Posted by: Pete Canning | March 3, 2005 03:58 PM

David Boaz once said, that "law, language and money all
came about without central direction." I think I got that
right.

Then there was gummint that fucked it all up.

Posted by: jomama | March 5, 2005 08:53 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)