ATTENTION: You are viewing my old blog archives, kept here for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To view the new archives, go here.
To find something on my new blog, search here.
Anyone else notice how Matt Drudge has started using italics?
Pentagon Eyes Massive Covert Attack on Iran...
Rumsfeld pushes for regime change...
Debate Slow...
Drones to be tested for traffic management...
SAUDIS ALLOW FOREIGNERS TO INTERROGATE THEIR CITIZENS...
Perhaps a sinister conspiracy theory would suffice!
As anyone who has discussed things with Objectivists know, they (and I...) have a remarkable tendancy to italicize and bolden selectively to stress concepts during an arguement. At times it feels like they are talking to a five-year-old, the way they bring attention to the things they are trying to convey.
Mr. Drudge's sudden acceptance and usage of italics must mean he has converted to a free market capitalism philosophy underneath our noses, choosing to join the elite of the elite thinkers in order to (bit by hypertext-transferred bit) bring about a cultural revolution!
Or he could just be bored and wants to spice his otherwise bland front page up.
[Note: It appears increasingly less likely the gay sex rumor is true.
UPDATE(3/5/2004) 10:42am
In addition, Governor Perry has directly denied the rumors.]
My previous fears turned out to be true. Senator Jeff Wentworth is the original author of SB 7 and I hope he's happy he has contributed to the continuing atmosphere of second-class homosexual status. I'm sure he'd be completely understandable if it was his relationship on the line.
Texas Gov. OKs 'Defense of Marriage Act'
Gov. Rick Perry signed a law preventing Texas from legally recognizing same-sex unions that are formed in other states.[...]
"Like the vast majority of Texans, I believe that marriage represents a sacred union between a man and a woman," Perry said in a statement. "With passage of the Defense of Marriage Act, Texas now joins more than 30 states in reinforcing that basic belief."
Tuesday's signing of the Defense of Marriage Act makes it the 37th state to enact such a law, said Kelly Shackelford, president of the Plano-based Free Market Foundation, a group that describes itself as dedicated to strengthening families.
Social conservatives piss me off.
UPDATE(2/19/2004 9:04am)
Looking for the Rick Perry gay sex thing?
UPDATE(2/20/2004 9:42am)
More here.
UPDATE(2/24/2004 9:16am)
I won't be updating this page after this point. A new post on this can be found here. There is a bit more to report.
Television Show for Cats Set to Debut
A Decatur manufacturer is hoping a new television show will be a cat-alyst for a new wave of programming."Meow TV," developed by the Meow Mix Co., debuts Friday at 6:30 p.m. on the Oxygen Network. It's the first show targeted at cats. Not cat lovers. Cats.
The half-hour program was developed after research showed that one-third of cats enjoy watching television, said Ira Cohen, marketing director for Meow Mix."It's real fun," Cohen said. "The mission of the Meow Mix Co. is to keep cats happy, so we developed this program for cats and the people they tolerate."
Local workers at the manufacturing plant offered input on the show, which features cat yoga, cat haiku and sporadic video of squirrels and fish.Actress Sandra Bernhard narrates mock infomercials geared toward humans, such as "The House Cat Shopping Network."
Viewers also can send in birthday greetings to their cats and videos of their cats doing "something cool."
The first episode features a cat that eats with chopsticks and a cat surfing in the ocean.
Nebraska Lawmaker Proposes War With Iowa
A Nebraska lawmaker is so fed up with constituents crossing the state border to gamble that she proposed going to war with neighboring Iowa."I've been cautioned that the members of the Iowa Legislature might not take it kindly,' said Sen. Pam Brown of Omaha.
Brown's proposed amendment read: "The sovereign state of Nebraska declares a state of hostility with the sovereign state of Iowa until such a time as the state of Iowa ceases the unjust and relentless appropriation of the resources of the citizens of Nebraska."
And, according to Ms. Brown, the State of Iowa is doing this "relentlessly." It certainly sounds like she thinks Iowa is engaging in criminal enterprise.
Brown offered the amendment to a proposed constitutional amendment that would ask votes to approve casino gambling in Nebraska.[...]
Supporters of the casino measure have complained that Nebraskans spend an estimated $250 million a year at casinos in Council Bluff, Iowa, just across the border from Omaha.
She said she offered the tongue-in-cheek proposal to get her colleagues focused on the seriousness of the issue.[...]
Brown later withdrew the amendment.
At least, that's what I extracted from this article
College entrance exam scores are falling among University of Texas applicants admitted under the Texas top 10 percent law, and the measure has failed to substantially improve ethnic diversity on campus, an Austin American-Statesman analysis has found.
Since 1996, when UT was still using affirmative action, the median SAT score of admitted students who graduated in the top 10 percent of their high school class has fallen 20 points, to 1250. The median score of all other students has increased 30 points, to 1240.
The number of admitted top 10 percent applicants whose SAT scores dipped below the national average of 1020 has more than doubled from about 350 in 1996 to about 730 in 2002.
Although UT officials have expanded recruiting efforts to more Texas high schools than ever before, including many with high minority populations, Hispanic and African American students have made only marginal gains in admissions. Asian enrollments have increased, while enrollment of white students has declined.
You can herd, cajole, threaten, bribe, and use all other manner of incitements on people to change their behavior...but if they don't want to fucking do it then the only thing you can do is force them. It is ass-scorchingly obvious that even determined attempts to get minorities enrolled at UT-Austin failed because they either don't want to go or they are too stupid to get anywhere in college...and interestingly enough, everyone else (caucasian or not) is the same gawddamn way.
The percentage of white and minority students admitted to UT has changed only slightly since the law was enacted, but these students are being recruited from a wider variety of high schools throughout the state. Many of those schools received midrange ratings of "recognized" or "acceptable" by the Texas Education Agency.
The largest number of admitted UT students overall still comes from schools located mostly in predominantly white areas, such as Westlake High School, where 88 percent of the graduating seniors are white.
Supporters, including UT admissions director Bruce Walker, said the law has been vital in bridging the diversity gap created by the Hopwood ruling, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision that eliminated race-based college admissions in Texas in 1996."We don't know what our world would be if we didn't have the top 10 percent bill," Walker said. "We would have stumbled around and struggled to try to find a way back to diversity without affirmative action."
"I...I did all I could."
Some critics say the law isn't doing enough to achieve diversity despite efforts to recruit students of color. They point out that the number of Hispanic and African American freshmen who enrolled at UT between 1998 and 2002 held steady at about 14 percent and 3 percent, respectively.
The American-Statesman analysis was based on an examination of two separate databases — one with SAT and ACT scores and other academic indicators, and another with demographic information for first-year applicants before and after the law was implemented. UT declined to release one database containing all the information, because federal laws prohibit the release of personally identifiable academic records.In the absence of a complete, combined database, it's impossible to verify what many believe: that students graduating in the top 10 percent of average Texas high schools are displacing non-top 10 graduates from high-performing schools in more affluent areas.
The newspaper's analysis underlines both the concerns about diversity and questions about whether the law, with its emphasis on class rank, is producing academically weaker UT students."They don't account for the quality of education in the high school," said Ann Springer, associate counsel for the Washington-based American Association of University Professors, of percent plans such as the one in Texas. "You could have a failing high school that is giving a terrible education, and you're going to guarantee them admission when they're not ready to succeed at a university."
Walker counters such concerns by citing a study he completed in January, along with Gary Lavergne, UT director of admissions research, showing that from 1996 to 2001, students admitted under the top 10 percent law made higher grade-point averages in their first year at UT than non-top 10 percent students.
The Legislature passed the top 10 percent law in 1997, the year after a federal court effectively dismantled affirmative action admissions policies here. Intended as a colorblind mechanism to ensure ethnic diversity, the law guarantees those who graduate in the top 10 percent of their high school classes a place at the Texas public campus of their choice.
The law has brought about a monumental shift in priorities among thousands of Texas' college-bound students. Instead of focusing on the traditional SAT exam, application essay and extracurricular activities, students are scrambling for top 10 percent class rank. They are taking advanced placement classes, which tend to boost class rank, and enrolling in community college classes which gain them credits that don't factor into their GPA. Further, anecdotes abound about students transferring to less challenging schools to guarantee admission to UT.[...]
Under the state's top 10 percent system, the importance of the SAT in college admissions has lessened because students with low scores can still graduate at the top of their classes.
Walker and other UT officials said that's fine because the SAT is only a benchmark, not the best measure of academic quality. Walker said he's not surprised the scores are falling because students in the top 10 percent know they'll get in regardless of how they do on the SAT.
The schools with the most percentage growth in top 10 percent students had predominantly minority enrollments, such as O.D. Wyatt High School in Fort Worth, Kerr High School in Houston and several schools in the Rio Grande Valley. Kerr received an "exemplary" rating from the Texas Education Agency — the highest rating the state gives based on statewide accountability test scores and dropout rates. Most of the other schools achieved "acceptable" to "recognized" ratings for their performance.That hasn't stopped university officials such as Faulkner from making recruiting visits. As part of its efforts, the university also established recruiting centers in Dallas and Houston and offers scholarships to help attract minority applicants in the top 10 percent of their classes.
The mission of The University of Texas at Austin is to achieve excellence in the interrelated areas of undergraduate education, graduate education, research, and public service.
If this is true, then recruitment efforts shouldn't be based on racial discrimination. Demonstrated and potential academic performance should remain the single most important factors in recruitment efforts.
Eco-Activists Taking on Company Workers
At 3 a.m. one recent morning, animal rights activists enraged by a company that tests products on animals gathered outside the home of an executive.They bellowed through bullhorns, made sirens pierce through the night and papered the Los Angeles neighborhood in leaflets denouncing Huntingdon Life Sciences officials as, among other things, "puppy killers."
"We'll be back," the group, Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty, later warned the executive on its Web site. "We know where you live, we know where you work, and we'll make your life hell until you pull out of HLS."
What made the noisy protest unusual was that its target wasn't an executive with Huntingdon Life Sciences: It was a manager of a Los Angeles company that just sells software to Huntingdon.
The radical environmental group Earth Liberation Front is claiming responsibility for fires that destroyed two houses near Ann Arbor in March.The slogan "ELF, no sprawl" was spray painted on the garage door of a house next to one of those burned March 21 in the Mystic Forest subdivision. On its Web site, the group claims responsibility for the fires, which it says caused $400,000 in damage.
The group also takes responsibility for burning luxury homes being built near Philadelphia late last year. A picture of a burning home is featured on the Web site, along with instructions on how to start fires.
The group says no one has claimed responsibility for last summer's fires that destroyed two luxury homes under construction, but police said they suspect the ELF.
The FBI has said it considers the Earth Liberation Front one of the nation's most prolific domestic terrorist organizations. The group has claimed responsibility for a series of antigrowth attacks in the past six years.
Maybe capitalists should use some of this cool "direct action" stuff to promote OUR views!
Start with , Gamal Gamal, the registered owner of http://www.shac.net/.
6 Boat Lane
Evesham
WR11 4BP
Worcs
GREAT BRITAIN
info@shac.net
+44.845 458 0630
But that's all on the front page of their site. More appropriately given the first story, why not just target XS4ALL, their domain host? How much abuse can their admins take late at night at their homes? Perhaps more locally, why not stop by SHAC's American site and find some connected companies? Unfortunately, there is no personal contact info (afraid of something?), though we do know who provides their hosting service: TUCOWS' OpenSRS. We can all pile in and drive to Canada and bug them! How about that!
As for the Earth Liberation Front...I wonder if Darren Thurston
PO Box 78061, 2606 Commercial Drive
Vancouver
BC
V5N1G8
CA
604-618-5469
and his family and friends would enjoy some good 'ole capitalist chanting in front of their homes? We can recite Rand and turn Mises into song! We can bring recordings praising the sheer gosh-darn usefullness of turning Nature into cheap commodities for everyone to enjoy.
And once we're done...we'll burn his FUCKING house down.
I'm sure that'll convince him to stop either his heinous activities, his promotion of them (destruction profiteer!!!), or his friends who do both.
End sarcasm.
UPDATE(8/7/2003 7:15am)
The bastards are getting ambitious.
Investigators said Tuesday that arsonists from an environmental terrorist group were to blame for a fire at an apartment complex under construction that caused $50 million in damage.The Earth Liberation Front, linked to arson incidents across the West, claimed responsibility for setting fire to the five-story apartment complex Friday in San Diego.
A 12-foot banner found at the scene read: "If you build it, we will burn it," along with the initials ELF. The group, which only communicates with the news media by e-mail, issued a brief statement saying the banner "is a legitimate claim of responsibility by the Earth Liberation Front."
"The intent was to burn the structure to the ground," said San Diego Fire Capt. Jeffrey A. Carle, an arson investigator who called the fire one of the costliest in city history. He declined to say what was used to start the three-alarm blaze. There were no injuries.
For two-thirds of Americans age 65 or older, a Social Security check is their top source of income. For one in five, it's all they have.Today's workers better not rely as heavily on the overburdened federal retirement system, the Social Security Administration is warning in a nationwide education tour this month.
"Americans really are counting too much on Social Security," Deputy Commissioner James Lockhart said. "We just put out our 75-year forecast, and it shows that over the long term, there are serious financing issues."
Social Security, established in 1935, provides a check to nearly all retirees who worked in wage and salary jobs or were self-employed. To participate, workers and their employers each pay taxes equal to 6.2 percent of covered wages, up to $87,000 this year.
The system was designed not as an individual savings plan but as a promise between generations. Taxes on today's workers provide the monthly checks for yesterday's workers.
At first, keeping the promise was easy. In 1955, the country had nearly nine workers for each person receiving Social Security. But with longer lives and lower birth rates, the government projects that by 2030 only about two workers will be available to support each beneficiary.
To prepare for this demographic shift, the Social Security Administration has been building a reserve, at least on paper.Excess payroll taxes that aren't needed to pay benefits are invested in special U.S. Treasury bonds. These bonds, worth about $1.2 trillion at the end of last year, make up the Social Security Trust Fund.
Unfortunately for tomorrow's retirees, the tax money that bought those bonds has been spent to keep the federal government running. The bonds themselves are nothing more than IOUs that the federal government has written to itself against the day that payroll taxes are no longer sufficient to pay Social Security benefits.
And that day is not far off. In March, the program's trustees estimated that by 2018 Social Security will have to start cashing its IOUs. In 2042, the trust fund will run out of money, and payroll-tax revenue will cover only 73 percent of payable benefits.
It's MY money.
It was taken from me with the promise to return it in the future.
I have no useful or practical control over it.
Other people determine how I can use it and when I can withdraw it.
And it's MY fucking money.
As I wrote previously, the amount of sense it makes to use this money privately and invest it is so tremendous, only the Left could condemn it.
So starting in 2018, Congress faces a range of politically painful choices. It could raise payroll taxes, cut other government programs or run up the federal debt, all of which may anger younger workers. Or it could slash Social Security benefits or raise the retirement age again, which would anger older workers and retirees.
To avoid such drastic measures, lawmakers have been discussing Social Security reforms for years.
But progress has been especially slow under President Bush, said Robert Bixby, executive director of the Concord Coalition, a group that lobbies for a balanced federal budget and Social Security reform.The issue "isn't on the front burner. It isn't even on the back burner," Bixby said. "It's in the deep freeze."
That's because the White House has been focused on cutting taxes. In 2001, Bush spurred Congress to cut taxes by $1.35 trillion over 10 years. Another 10-year, $350 billion cut is nearing approval in Congress.
At the same time, the 2001 terrorist attacks and the war in Iraq have added tens of billions of dollars in federal spending, even as the weak economy has sapped tax revenues.
Sometimes when I get an unexpected flow of money, I save it or invest it.
Sometimes I don't. :)
Lesse...start off with an IRS refund of $550.
Rightstuf DVD purchase of FLCL volume 2 & a pre-order of volume 3 for $51...
Wal-mart purchase for $33 for new seat covers...
Red's Indoor Range Winchester SilverTip 9mm ammunition & range time for $42...
PlanetAnime purchase of the first five and the seventh DVD volumes of Rurouni Kenshin as well as volumes two through four of Berserk for $203...
Rightstuf order of $78 for the DBZ Garlic Jr. DVD box set & the Gasaraki Perfect Collection DVD box set...
Fry's purchase of a refurbished Dell 19" monitor, a 3-CD set of Rachmaninoff orchestral music, the Miles Davis 2-CD set Complete Concert 1964: My Funny Valentine + Four More, and John Coltrane's Live at the Half Note for $202...
Total: $609
And I even held back in some places. *laughs wildly*
Utah Prepares for Firing-Squad Executions
The only state that dispatches condemned inmates by firing squad is assembling gunmen for back-to-back executions next month.The nation's last execution by firing squad was in 1996.
Exercising their right under Utah law, serial killer Roberto Arguelles and Troy Michael Kell, a white supremacist who stabbed a fellow inmate to death, have chosen the firing squad over lethal injection and are set to die at 12:01 a.m. on June 27 and 28, respectively.
The Utah Corrections Department is recruiting law enforcement officers for two five-person firing squads, asking the police departments in the communities where the crimes were committed to nominate volunteers.The officers' identities will not be released, and participants will be barred from talking publicly about the experience.
A hood will be put over the condemned man's head and a target will be pinned over his heart. The executioners will fire simultaneously from gun portals in a separate room at the inmate, seated in a chair about 30 feet away.
One of the five rifles will contain a blank so that no one will know who fired the fatal shots.
Each rifle should be loaded with full-power ammunition and each officer should bear the responsibility for killing the convict. Anything less is abdicating integrity.
UPDATED 8/13/2005 1:15pm
I don't know what happened to the comments below. I'm looking into it. You can view Google's cache of the discussion here.
In the meantime, please use this post to continue your discussions.
Radley Balko uncovers a truely stupid manifestation of stupid legislative intrusion.
The fat cops are on the prowl again. Not content with the current spate of obesity-inspired lawsuits, "nutrition" interests have taken to the state legislatures, looking to pass "menu labeling" laws that will pave the way for, yes, even more lawsuits.The state of Maine recently introduced legislation requiring all restaurant chains with 20 or more franchises to print nutritional information for all items listed on menus. The state of New York is considering similar legislation.
Now comes Texas, with a menu labeling bill sponsored by Rep. Dennis Bonnen, which just passed the Texas legislature's Public Health Committee. Rep. Bonnen's bill would require all restaurants with three or more locations in the state to label every menu item with its fat, calories, cholesterol, carbohydrates, fiber, sugar, and protein content - on every menu. It would also require every item on every menu that gets more than 1/3 of calories from fat to print the warning: "Eating Fatty Foods May Lead to Obesity." Failure to comply would result in a $100 fine and up to six months in jail - for each offense.
Dreadful stupidty isn't limited to east coast and west coast governments.
Via Instapundit.
ADVFilms has a press release confirming this
Already, the fans are stirring. *laughs*
In an announcement sure to make waves in the entertainment industry, ADV Films President and CEO John Ledford today publicly confirmed industry rumors that the firm has acquired the rights to produce, and has already begun development of, a live-action feature-film based on the Japanese animated television series “Neon Genesis Evangelion,” a multi-million dollar worldwide franchise and perhaps the most influential anime title in the history of the art form. The project is a collaboration between ADV Films, Gainax and Weta Workshop, Ltd.The Participants
ADV Films is the leading producer-distributor of Japanese animation in North America. The Japanese anime and game studio Gainax Network Systems was one of the original production studios responsible for “Neon Genesis Evangelion,” and Weta Workshop, Ltd. is the New Zealand-based special effects studio that created the effects for Peter Jackson’s “Lord of the Rings” trilogy.“The three main players here represent something of a ‘dream-team’ for a project like this one,” said Ledford. “Between the quality and significance of the Gainax title, Weta’s industry-leading skill in the creation of special visual effects, and our expertise in the marketing and promotion of anime and anime-related content, this project is truly a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.”
The Story
“Neon Genesis Evangelion” is the story of a reluctant young hero, called upon to pilot an immense robotic weapon in battle against alien invaders. Including both a 26-episode television series and at least two animated motion pictures, “Neon Genesis Evangelion” has long been both a fan favorite and an extraordinary critical and commercial success, with the worldwide franchise producing many millions of dollars in revenue.Timetable
The “Neon Genesis Evangelion” live-action motion picture is in the earliest stages of development. Ledford confirmed, however, that the timetable is an aggressive one, and that more information on the project is forthcoming.
I hope this project works and adds worthwhile material to the story. Of course, I happen to think that is just about impossible considering the finality of the TV series and the subsequent animated movies. Also, no mention of Director Hideaki Anno, who also worked on the script, mecha design, and storyboards. NGE was his baby and it would be unholy if he had nothing to do with it.
As for actors and actresses, I wouldn't know where to begin...
UPDATE(6/4/2003 12:15pm)
IMDB has a page set up for the movie. No data yet. There are also rumors that Neil Gaiman may be working on the script.
UPDATE(6/15/2003)
Check out this image from a recent issue of Newtype. According to some people, the large Japanese script near Asuka has the word "Hollywood" in it. Make what you will of it.
UPDATE(6/20/2003)
The July issue of Newtype will have a "first look" at the production.
UPDATE(6/24/2003)
And check out the news of FLCL possibly getting a spot on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim lineup.
UPDATE(7/14/2003 9:40pm)
More here, including what the issue of Newtype has in it.
UPDATE(7/22/2003 11:50pm)
"Harry Potter" as Shinji Ikari???
UPDATE(7/26/2003 3:36pm)
A commenter points out this site which is also tracking the Eva movie development.
UPDATE(10/12/2003 9:35pm)
What would cause Hell to freeze over? Perhaps these things. My contribution:

And in other news, today in Hell, temperatures dropped an
amazing 450ºC, freezing the molten brimstone, shattering
every piece of glass, and enraging Beelzebub. "Damn Yahweh
and this blanket-less pit! There isn't a down comforter or pair
of wool socks to be found! I'm making a formal complaint as
soon as I find some hapless soul to set ablaze!" The Wicked
One reportedly exclaimed.
UPDATE(11/6/2003)
Here's a reason to get Neon Genesis Evangelion: Resurrection when it comes out in January 2004:
In addition to the Directors' Cut episodes, ADV has obtained special DVD extras that are sure to fuel the excitement for this highly anticipated release. Resurrection will include an exclusive 25-minute interview with Richard Taylor, co-founder and head of Effects and Creatures at Weta Workshop, the multiple Academy Award-winning (for The Lord of the Rings trilogy) special effects studio currently working on the Neon Genesis Evangelion live-action feature. Also included are numerous never-before-seen production images from the theatrical release.
UPDATED 8/3/2006 10:10pm
Via e-mail, a comment from "Nick the Eva freak":
Ok guys get ready for my rant cause i am seriously in doubt about this.The Director, Actors and staff should all be WELL aware of the possibility that their careers could very well end (or lives) if this turns out bad. I live in Edmonton in Canada and we have an annual animethon. i think this years turnout was topping 2000 people and we're kinda in the backwoods. I asked about the project and there are enough militant eva fans that i seriously fear for the director's life (well not really).
It seems to me ADV (get ready for it) has a bad history as it is. I just finished watching "Elfen Lied" in the ADV dubbed and a fan sub. THE STORY WASN'T EVEN THE SAME!! I also did the same with Eva. There were a few less errors but still, I wouldn't trust ADV to make a convincing retelling of "ba ba blacksheep" let alone Eva.
Eva was the FIRST anime i ever watched and it is the only series in which i own it's entirety. It has been my obsession for a long time and i can't stand anyone wrecking it. If this movie turns out to be a Hollywood action movie that ignores even a small amount of the character and drama and symbolism i will be one of the first to come and kill EVERY person who had a hand in it.
Previously, I mentioned how some legislators were pushing to free some aspects of the University of Texas's tutition system in order to allow each university to set their own rates. Unfortunately, the idea gathered a bit of steam but has now been announced "dead" (links rot after a day):
Although a House sponsor is holding out slim hope that it can be resuscitated, the ambitious plan to deregulate undergraduate tuition and let Texas universities set their own rates appeared dead Tuesday."It's gone," said Sen. Florence Shapiro, R-Plano, chairwoman of the Senate Education Committee. "There's no semblance of deregulation left."
The Senate panel passed House Bill 3015, allowing limited tuition deregulation for graduate programs but none for undergraduates. Even though the House had already diluted the measure, supporting deregulation for only one year, the Senate panel watered it down more, rejecting any tuition-setting freedom.
Instead of deregulating tuition, lawmakers have decided to study the issue. They also are poised to allow universities to increase tuition by as little as $8 and as much as $23 a credit-hour. The exact increase was left pending until the Legislature completes the state budget.[...]
Larry Faulkner, president of the University of Texas, said he was not surprised by deregulation's demise.
"In the end, it would be better for the state to head in that (deregulation) direction," he said.
Early in the legislative session, unshackling universities and letting them set their tuition looked like a viable option to offset cuts of as much as $1 billion in the two-year budget.Craddick was among the state's leaders who supported the move. But lawmakers quickly developed cold feet about turning over their power to set tuition to boards of regents.
Sen. Royce West, D-Dallas, chairman of the Senate Higher Education subcommittee, said he wanted universities to prove they were meeting state goals of increasing enrollment by 500,000 by 2015 and were educating a growing number of minorities before giving them a freer rein.
[...]
Students, largely from UT, testified at several legislative hearings, begging lawmakers to keep their tuition-setting prerogative.
They said regents were appointed and thus were not accountable to voters.
Have you read his remarks? Totally unfitting for a graduation ceremony they are, but they also reveal quite a bit about him and his philosophy. From here on, I will take any reporting of his with strong skepticism.
For we are embarking on an occupation that, if history is any guide, will be as damaging to our souls as it will be to our prestige, power, and security. But this will come later as our empire expands and in all this we become pariahs, tyrants to others weaker than ourselves. Isolation always impairs judgment and we are very isolated now.
We have folded in on ourselves, we have severely weakened the delicate international coalitions and alliances that are vital in maintaining and promoting peace and we are part now of a dubious troika in the war against terror with Vladimir Putin and Ariel Sharon, two leaders who do not shrink in Palestine or Chechnya from carrying out acts of gratuitous and senseless acts of violence. We have become the company we keep.
Terrorism will become a way of life, and when we are attacked we will, like our allies Putin and Sharon, lash out with greater fury. The circle of violence is a death spiral; no one escapes.
The real injustices, the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land, the brutal and corrupt dictatorships we fund in the Middle East, will mean that we will not rid the extremists who hate us with bombs. Indeed we will swell their ranks. Once you master people by force you depend on force for control. In your isolation you begin to make mistakes.
Fear engenders cruelty; cruelty, fear, insanity, and then paralysis.
We have blundered into a nation we know little about and are caught between bitter rivalries and competing ethnic groups and leaders we do not understand. We are trying to transplant a modern system of politics invented in Europe characterized, among other things, by the division of earth into independent secular states based on national citizenship in a land where the belief in a secular civil government is an alien creed. Iraq was a cesspool for the British when they occupied it in 1917; it will be a cesspool for us as well.
Shortly after this, he was interrupted and Rockford College President Paul Pribbenow spoke to the crowd about respecting the speaker. Mr. Hedges continued:
The occupation of the oil fields, the notion of the Kurds and the Shiites will listen to the demands of a centralized government in Baghdad, the same Kurds and Shiites who died by the tens of thousands in defiance of Sadaam Hussein, a man who happily butchered all of those who challenged him, and this ethnic rivalry has not gone away.
This is a war of liberation in Iraq, but it is a war now of liberation by Iraqis from American occupation.
We will pay for this, but what saddens me most is that those who will by and large pay the highest price are poor kids from Mississippi or Alabama or Texas who could not get a decent job or health insurance and joined the army because it was all we offered them.
We have lost touch with the essence of war. Following our defeat in Vietnam we became a better nation. We were humbled, even humiliated. We asked questions about ourselves we had not asked before.
War, we have come to believe, is a spectator sport.
The military and the press -- remember in wartime the press is always part of the problem -- have turned war into a vast video arcade came. Its very essence -- death -- is hidden from public view.
Because we no longer understand war, we no longer understand that it can all go horribly wrong.
The seduction of war is insidious because so much of what we are told about it is true -- it does create a feeling of comradeship which obliterates our alienation and makes us, for perhaps the only time of our life, feel we belong.War allows us to rise above our small stations in life; we find nobility in a cause and feelings of selflessness and even bliss.
War gives us a distorted sense of self...
At this point, the crowd has gotten ansty again and is making more noise. Hedges later continues:
Think back on the days after the attacks on 9-11. Suddenly we no longer felt alone; we connected with strangers, even with people we did not like. We felt we belonged, that we were somehow wrapped in the embrace of the nation, the community; in short, we no longer felt alienated.
As this feeling dissipated in the weeks after the attack, there was a kind of nostalgia for its warm glow and wartime always brings with it this comradeship, which is the opposite of friendship.
Friends are predetermined; friendship takes place between men and women who possess an intellectual and emotional affinity for each other. But comradeship -- that ecstatic bliss that comes with belonging to the crowd in wartime -- is within our reach. We can all have comrades.
The danger of the external threat that comes when we have an enemy does not create friendship; it creates comradeship. And those in wartime are deceived about what they are undergoing. And this is why once the threat is over, once war ends, comrades again become strangers to us. This is why after war we fall into despair.
In friendship there is a deepening of our sense of self. We become, through the friend, more aware of who we are and what we are about; we find ourselves in the eyes of the friend. Friends probe and question and challenge each other to make each of us more complete; with comradeship, the kind that comes to us in patriotic fervor, there is a suppression of self-awareness, self-knowledge, and self-possession. Comrades lose their identities in wartime for the collective rush of a common cause -- a common purpose. In comradeship there are no demands on the self. This is part of its appeal and one of the reasons we miss it and seek to recreate it. Comradeship allows us to escape the demands on the self that is part of friendship.In wartime when we feel threatened, we no longer face death alone but as a group, and this makes death easier to bear. We ennoble self-sacrifice for the other, for the comrade; in short we begin to worship death. And this is what the god of war demands of us.
Things have changed considerably since the last time I wrote about vouchers. Bills have been sidelined, killed, amended, and proposed. It looks like there may be a substantial push to accomplish something before the legislative term ends.
The word around the Texas Capitol is that Chairman Kent Grusendorf believes he has enough votes to pass a private school voucher floor amendment, and he intends to force a voucher vote in the Texas House of Representatives in the next few days. The most likely legislative vehicle for a voucher amendment is Senate Bill 1108, which is ON THE SCHEDULE FOR THURSDAY, MAY 22 in the Texas House of Representatives.
SB 1108 was authored by Senator Florence Shapiro, Chairwoman of the Senate Education Committee. The bill has since gone through some changes.
As I said in my last post, I support voucher programs because they introduce a marginally higher level of individual freedom in education than a non-voucher system. However, the fact remains that this is still tax money used to fund the educations of others and I do not support that in the long run.
UPDATE(4/28/2004 9:26am)
Governor Perry would support a voucher plan if one crossed his desk after the special session. The other proposed solutions for Texas school financing aren't any better.
No time...must post quickly...the 24 season finale will be on shortly. Must not miss it.
Study Finds No Sign That Testing Deters Students' Drug Use
Drug testing in schools does not deter student drug use any more than doing no screening at all, the first large-scale national study on the subject has found....the new federally financed study of 76,000 students nationwide, by far the largest to date, found that drug use is just as common in schools with testing as in those without it.
[...]
The study, published last month in The Journal of School Health, a peer-reviewed publication of the American School Health Association, found that 37 percent of 12th graders in schools that tested for drugs said they had smoked marijuana in the last year, compared with 36 percent in schools that did not. In a universe of tens of thousands of students, such a slight deviation is statistically insignificant, and it means the results are essentially identical, the researchers said.
Similarly, 21 percent of 12th graders in schools with testing said they had used other illicit drugs like cocaine or heroin in the last year, while 19 percent of their counterparts in schools without screening said they had done so.
The same pattern held for every other drug and grade level.
Bill would make some colleges free
The Senate gave tentative approval Monday to a bill that would let students -- regardless of grades or income -- attend community colleges or public technical colleges free. But there's a catch.Senators, for now, are more generous than the state budget allows. So the program, even if it wins final legislative approval this spring, isn't likely to be funded for the next two years.
[...]
The measure, which would cover a student's tuition, fees and books for up to two years, could soon cost $146 million a year, if lawmakers ever pay for it.
Comptroller pushes $1 per pack hike in cigarette tax
Comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn broke from other no-new-taxes-pledging Republican statewide officials Monday and recommended that Texas lawmakers increase the tax on cigarettes by $1 a pack to help cover the state’s growing budget woes.[...]
Texas’ cigarette tax has not changed since 1990, when it went up to 41 cents a pack.
Committees will analyze Bennett's "1040 Form on a Postcard" proposal
The U.S. Senate today overwhelmingly passed legislation sponsored by Sen. Bob Bennett calling on the Senate Finance Committee and the Joint Economic Committee (JEC) to hold hearings and consider legislation providing for overhaul of the Internal Revenue Code and implementation of a federal flat tax."Since my '92 campaign, when I called for a simplified tax code and a 1040 form the size of a postcard, I've been working to convince my colleagues that this is something we should consider," said Bennett, who chairs the JEC. "An overwhelming majority of the Senate today said we should study this proposal and has named my committee as a key point for this debate. I'm gratified that my calls for this reform are gaining support and will be considered in the Senate."
[...]
When discussing tax simplification options, Bennett noted some estimates that show the flat tax will expand the economy by $2 trillion over seven years. He also noted that the current Internal Revenue Code is over 17,000 pages and 6,900,000 words.
How the Killer D's pulled off an improbable plot to freeze the House
The whole article is worth reading for the tidbits that fill in the gaps. It details the events leading up to the weekend with the clandestine meetings among small groups of Democrats. The piece goes over the intial Craddick/DPS/House confusion and explains several issues such as the request for federal government assistence, Pete Laney's plane, and the reports of law enforcement harassment of Democrat families. Overall very much worth the read.
Continuing from AWOL Texas Dems & Congressional Elections and AWOL Texas Dems & Congressional Elections con't...
A few minutes ago I called Robert Haney, the Texas House of Representatives' Chief Clerk of Legislative Operations to ask him if he knew the status on members' permanent residential addresses. He told me it was up to the member to decide to make that data publicly available. I'd have to contact them to find out.
So, I'm unsure where to go from here. The original question Mr. Hobbs asked seemed mostly of a rhetorical nature, but now I really am curious to see just how the prospects of the House Reps would change as their Congressional House District changes. But given the number of calls I'd have to make and also given the possibility the members' staff may not give out that data, it could turn out to be an unreliable survey.
I'll think about it for the rest of the day and post again later tonight.
After getting re-aquainted with handgun shooting, taking the safety course and passing it, applying for the permit, waiting, and then getting word my application was completed and my license issued, I finally picked up my Concealed Handgun License in the mail today. The picture ain't that bad.
My responsibility is now staring me in the face. Contrary what some people would say, this isn't a license to kill and this is not a reason to shoot. The purpose of a firearm carried in self-defense is exactly that: self-defense. It is neither an excuse to save the day nor a tool to intimidate. The power the state has recognized for me to possess (while the right to do so was always there) in public is deadly and destructive precisely because that is where the power of the gun lies. From now on, I'll have an extra option in every situation. I hope I'll never have to exercise it.
So, the search is now on for find a pistol that I can actually carry on me. The Browning Hi-Power is just a liiittle too big. My dad has been giving me the sales pitch on compact .38 revolvers. I dunno...I shoot terribly with those. More practice on the range is gonna be needed.
Screw going through all that if you ever need to carry a firearm on your person in a short time, though. Someone who is threatened and who needs personal protection shouldn't have to wait months for this.
Having realized I wasted much of my time after work yesterday, I've been trying to find what I really need to continue: the permanent residential addresses of Texas House members. And perhaps I'm just doing it wrong, but I can't find them. I don't know if such information is publicly available or what (if any) legalities apply to obtaining it.
I tried, but since it's the weekend, no one of any use is available on the phone at the Elections Division of the Texas Secretary of State. Ditto for the clerks at the House. I searched through most of the Texas Election Code that should be relevant to this, but struck out. I'll keep trying on Monday.
So in the meantime, check out the Texas Redistricting RedViewer, a Texas Legislative Council feature that allows you to view, interact with, and compare various redistricting plans. There are also deeply interesting population and election analysis reports.
The current map is Plan 01151C. The one which was proposed is Plan 01180C.
UPDATE(10/12/2003 9:33pm)
Big News: a plan has been finalized and passed by both the House and the Senate.
I've made a number of posts (first, second, third, and fourth) on the Texas House Democrats who successfully busted a quorum this week in order to kill a Republican-backed Congressional redistricting bill. Bill Hobbs asked
How many of those AWOL Texas legislators plan to run for Congress some day and would like to do so from a safe district - but whose current home within a currently-safely Democratic district is at risk of being shoved into a Republican-leaning district by the redistricting plan?
So. Let's first lay out the situation with Texas' US House Districts (USHD). There are 32, currently 17 Democrats to 15 Republicans. Here they are, along with their election results, which are listed as the percentages for the Representative vs. the next two highest candidates and their affiliations. Any Representatives who are in bold were NOT incumbents.
District 01, Max Sandlin, D-Marshall: 56.44% to 43.55% (GOP)
District 02, Jim Turner, D-Crockett: 60.84% to 38.18% (GOP) to <1% (Libertarian)
District 04, Ralph M. Hal, D-Rockwall: 57.82% to 40.37% (GOP) to 1.80% (Libertarian)
District 09, Nick Lampson, D-Beaumont: 58.60% to 40.30% (GOP) to 1.09% (Libertarian)
District 10, Lloyd Doggett, D-Austin: 84.37% to 15.62% (Libertarian)
District 11, Chet Edwards, D-Waco: 51.55% to 47.10% (GOP) to 1.34% (Libertarian)
District 15, Rubén Hinojosa, D-Mercedes: 100%, unopposed
District 16, Silvestre Reyes, D-El Paso: 100%, unopposed
District 17, Charles W. Stenholm, D-Abilene: 51.36% to 47.38% (GOP) to 1.24% (Libertarian)
District 18, Sheila Jackson-Lee, D-Houston: 76.91% to 21.70% (GOP) to 1.38% (Libertarian)
District 20, Charles A. Gonzalez, D-San Antonio: 100%, unopposed
District 24, Martin Frost, D-Dallas: 64.66% to 33.95% (GOP) to 1.38% (Libertarian)
District 25, Chris Bell, D-Houston: 54.75% to 43.09% (GOP) to 1.20% (Green)
District 27, Solomon P. Ortiz, D-Corpus Christi: 61.09% to 36.54% (GOP) to 2.35% (Libertarian)
District 28, Ciro D. Rodriguez, D-San Antonio: 71.09% to 26.86% (GOP) to 2.04% (Libertarian)
District 29, Gene Green, D-Houston: 95.16% to 4.83% (Libertarian)
District 30, Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-Dallas: 74.26% to 24.18% (GOP) to 1.54% (Libertarian)
District 03, Sam Johnson, R-Plano: 73.94% to 24.33% (DEM) to 1.72% (Libertarian)
District 05, Jeb Hensarling, R-Dallas: 58.20% to 40.26% (DEM) to <1% (Libertarian)
District 06, Joe Barton, R-Ennis: 70.34% to 27.67% (DEM) to 1.21% (Libertarian)
District 07, John Abney Culberson, R-Houston: 89.18% to 10.75% (DEM)
District 08, Kevin Brady, R-The Woodlands: 93.14% to 6.85% (Libertarian)
District 12, Kay Granger, R-Fort Worth: 97.87% to 8.12% (Libertarian)
District 13, Mac Thornberry, R-Clarendon: 79.27% to 20.72% (DEM)
District 14, Ron Paul, R-Surfside: 68.09% to 31.90% (DEM) [Paul is more of a libertarian than anything else, but whatever]
District 19, Larry Combest, R-Lubbock: 91.63% to 8.36% (Libertarian)
District 21, Lamar S. Smith, R-San Antonio: 72.86% to 25.30% (DEM) to 1.82% (Libertarian)
District 22, Tom DeLay, R-Sugar Land: 63.17% to 35.02% (DEM) to 1.01% (Libertarian)
District 23, Henry Bonilla, R-San Antonio: 51.52% to 47.20% (DEM) to <1% (Libertarian)
District 26, Michael C. Burgess, R-Highland Village: 74.80% to 22.76% (DEM) to 1.43% (Libertarian)
District 31, John R. Carter, R-Round Rock: 69.08% to 27.36% (DEM) to 1.26% (Libertarian)
District 32, Pete Sessions, R-Dallas: 67.76% to 30.34% (DEM) to 1.06% (Libertarian)
All election data taken from here.
I will arbitarily choose an electoral victory margin of 10% and less to be the standard to judge which Representatives' seats are "in danger." The Democrats who meet this standard are District 01's Max Sandlin, District 11's Chet Edwards, District 17's Charles W. Stenholm, and District 25's Chris Bell; a total of four. The only Republican who met this standard is District 23's Henry Bonilla.
Sandlin, Edwards, Stenholm, Bell, and Bonilla would all have their current districts radically altered hundreds of square miles under the new plan.
Now, it is very hard to know which Democratic Texas House reps want to or plan on running for the US House next election. Their official House websites offer no such insight. Time does not permit me to do an extensive news search either since I don't have access to Lexis-Nexis and I'll have friends knocking at my door later this evening. Can't let the friends down for some "stupid political thing," eh? :)
Initially, I thought it would make sense to compare the Democrats' Texas House Districts (TDH) to the differences between the new and the current USHD, but after I started doing this for the first five reps (which took waaay longer than I thought) I realized that wouldn't make sense in a Congressional election. The permanent residence address of the candidate matters. Not where their TDH is located; obviously a candidate doesn't even need one of those to run.
I just wasted 2.5 hours doing the wrong thing. Damn it.
So I need their home addresses and the Texas House website doesn't list them and I can't use the district office addresses they do list, for obvious reasons. Not every rep has a biography on their page and their home addresses aren't listed there anyways. OpenSecrets.org doesn't do state-level data. I don't even know if this information is publicly available. It would take too long to track down what is available tonight, so I unfortunately must out this off again.
I will return tomorrow to finish this. However, I do have some thoughts about the situation overall.
The Dems had the right to disagree with the DeLay/Craddick map. The merits of it are beyond my scope, but I can see why they'd be pissed. However, their choice to shut down the House rather than face a full vote was wrong. If their job is to serve the state through democratic means, then they have to understand the new reality: Republicans are now the majority party in the Texas House and therefore the principles of democracy require the Democrats to respect the majority's decisions provided they are achieved through a fair and legitimate vote. They don't have to agree with them and they certainly don't have to sit down and let bills they dislike pass, but what they did was not democratic, nor mature. They escaped reality and in the process ruined the legislative agenda for both sides at a very important time.
Personally, I think the less the legislature does the better since overall it would rather restrict freedom than increase it. But from a pop politics standpoint, I think what the Democrats did was wrong regardless of the horrors imposed by a new US House district map.
And now, I get to go explain all this to my waiting friends. *sigh*
UPDATE(10/12/2003 9:33pm)
Big News: a plan has been finalized and passed by both the House and the Senate.
I promised to post a detailed comparison of the AWOL Dems Texas House Districts (THD) to the differences between the current US House District (USHD) map and the proposed USHD map. I should be able to post the bulk of my analysis in a bit more than 45 minutes. This is far more time-consuming than I thought it would be. *sweadrop*
I'm not a regular reader of HobbsOnline, but he's been keeping track of the AWOL Dems very well. Especially for a Tennessean. *grin*
Due to the Blogger archive bug, I'll link to his current archive rather than the eight posts he's made so far.
However, one deserves a direct response.
Here's a question I'm hoping some Texas blogger will try to answer:
How many of those AWOL Texas legislators plan to run for Congress some day and would like to do so from a safe district - but whose current home within a currently-safely Democratic district is at risk of being shoved into a Republican-leaning district by the redistricting plan?
The answer will tell you how many of the Runaway Democrats are doing this solely out of naked personal ambition rather than any concern for what's best for Texas.
Dawnna Dukes, Austin
Jim Dunnam, Waco
John Mabry, Waco
Elliott Naishtat, Austin
Eddie Rodriguez, Austin
Patrick Rose, Dripping Springs
Roberto Alonzo, Dallas
Kevin Bailey, Houston
Lon Burnam, Fort Worth
Gabi Canales, Alice
Jaime Capelo, Corpus Christi
Joaquin Castro, San Antonio
Norma Chavez, El Paso
Garnet Coleman, Houston
Robby Cook, Eagle Lake
Yvonne Davis, Dallas
Joe Deshotel, Beaumont
Harold Dutton, Houston
Al Edwards, Houston
Craig Eiland, Galveston
Dan Ellis, Livingston
Juan Escobar, Kingsville
David Farabee, Wichita Falls
Jessica Farrar, Houston
Kino Flores, Mission
Pete Gallego, Alpine
Timoteo Garza, Eagle Pass
Helen Giddings, Dallas
Ryan Guillen, Rio Grande City
Scott Hochberg, Houston
Terri Hodge, Dallas
Mark Homer, Paris
Chuck Hopson, Jacksonville
Jesse Jones, Dallas
Pete Laney, Hale Center
Glenn Lewis, Fort Worth
John Mabry, Waco
Trey Martinez-Fischer, San Antonio
Ruth Jones McClendon, San Antonio
Jim McReynolds, Lufkin
Jose Menendez, San Antonio
Joe Moreno, Houston
Paul Moreno, El Paso
Rick Noriega, Houston
Rene Oliveira, Brownsville
Dora Olivo, Missouri City
Aaron Pena, Edinburg
Joe Pickett, El Paso
Robert Puente, San Antonio
Chente Quintanilla, Tornillo
Richard Raymond, Laredo
Allan Ritter, Nederland
Jim Solis, Harlingen
Barry Telford, DeKalb
Senfronia Thompson, Houston
Carlos Uresti, San Antonio
Mike Villarreal, San Antonio
Miguel Wise, Weslaco
Steve Wolens, Dallas
I will remark that the new map hacks up several areas into almost ridiculously detailed chunks, even moreso than before. The central-eastern triangle (Dallas, Austin, and Houston) and south-central border sections of the state have the worst fragmentation. I think the Democrats looking to advance to the federal sphere have good reason to fear for possible US House jobs as these areas are typically more democratic-leaning than the rest of the state. I'll try and dig up what I can on the ambitions of these politicians, but we know how they like to take their time in announcing their future plans.
More later.
UPDATE(9/23/2003 11:18pm)
More here. The redistricting maps are being discussed in the House and Senate after another walkout, this time by the Senate Democrats. They have since returned.
UPDATE(10/12/2003 9:32pm)
Big News: a plan has been finalized and passed by both the House and the Senate.
France and Germany refuse to rein in budgets
The euro zone Stability and Growth Pact came a step closer to collapse yesterday as both Germany and France announced they were abandoning efforts to balance their budgets by 2006.Faced with a severe economic downturn and a sharp rise in their currency, the two countries said it no longer made any sense to keep tightening belts.
Germany's finance minister, Hans Eichel, who has struggled to stick to the rules despite unemployment rising to 4.6m, effectively threw in the towel over the weekend."A balanced budget in 2006 can no longer be achieved," he said yesterday, blaming three years of economic stagnation.
Both Mr Eichel and Mr Mer exhorted the European Central Bank to relax monetary policy, arguing that inflation was now well under control.
I see the same similarities between the Texas budget battles and this. In each case, I believe the fundamental reason why there are terrible economic circumstances and budget deficits are because the state has become so large and intrusive that it acts as a ratchet for political groups and the contituencies they serve. Once you get someone else to provide goods, services, and income for you and for "free," it gets really hard to take that away. You get accused of "taking aim at families" or "soaking the rich" or "heartlessly abandoning children" or "targeting poor minorities" and such nonsense. No debate at all is generated over the real question: Why must others be forced to provide for others? Asking that to nearly all politicans is akin to asking why is the sky blue.
If we continue on the track of creeping statism by nips and inches, we'll end up like the EU one day. There are substantial differences between the two areas, granted, but even with the supposedly "smaller government" advocates (Republicans, as they call themselves) in power, I don't see any crucial changes.
Samizdata has been down all damn day. No British libertarian group-blogging goodness during work SUCKS.
Boo!
But my Concealed Handgun License application status has changed from "Processing Application" to ""Application Completed - license issued or certificate active." I'm waiting for the friendly government mailperson to drop off my license allowing me to rain leaded DEATH upon the hearts of those who oppose me! AH-HAHAHAHAHA!
Yay!
But the Senate wussed out and only passed a $350 billion tax cut package, entirely missing the point of cutting taxes in the first place. I wonder if any of these people understand basic economics.
Boo!
But Umm Qasr has made the first transition from US military rule to Iraqi civilian rule and it seems we've gotten seriouser about the security problems over there.
Yay!
But then I hear about the Austin City Council's possible plans (link rots after one day) for addressing a $55 million budget shortfall.
Midway through a bleak briefing on a grim budget Wednesday, Austin City Council members ran through eight scenarios about how next year's finances might shape up.Seven of the scenarios involved a higher tax rate.
But then I hear about the good chance a serious movie version of Atlas Shrugged is in the works. Now the important question...Who should play what?
Yay!
I'll just leave it at that. This could go on for days.
Boo?
Chancellor Gordon Brown has concluded the UK is not yet ready to join the euro, the BBC has learnt.Prime Minister Tony Blair has accepted the chancellor's view, though the finer details of an official announcement - which could come as soon as next week - are still being worked on.
But Mr Brown's ruling is that the UK has not passed his five economic tests for joining the currency.
A further key decision - when to assess the tests again - has yet to be reached.
Oh, and welcome back, Ms. Thatcher:
BARONESS Thatcher returned to politics last night with an attack on the French, whom she accused of collaborating with “enemies of the West” for short-term gain.
In a one-off comeback speech in New York, which broke a medical ban on speaking in public, the former Conservative Prime Minister attacked those who use environmentalism, feminism and human rights campaigns to fight capitalism and the nation state.She praised Tony Blair, but above all President Bush, for overriding the “rot” that “paralysed” the United Nations.
Lady Thatcher said: "For years, many governments played down the threats of Islamic revolution, turned a blind eye to international terrorism and accepted the development of weaponry of mass destruction. Indeed, some politicians were happy to go further, collaborating with the self-proclaimed enemies of the West for their own short-term gain — but enough about the French. So deep had the rot set in that the UN security council itself was paralysed."She spoke of her pride at the way Britain stood by America over Iraq: "Our own Prime Minister was staunch and our forces were superb. But, above, all, it is President Bush who deserves the credit for victory."
Lady Thatcher said that she had "drunk deep from the same well of ideas" as her great ally, the former US President Ronald Reagan. Both instinctively knew what worked, she said, including low taxes, small government and enterprise. "We knew, too, what did not work, namely socialism in every shape or form. Nowadays socialism is more often dressed up as environmentalism, feminism, or international concern for human rights. All sound good in the abstract.
"But scratch the surface and you will as likely as not discover anti-capitalism, patronising and distorting quotas, and intrusions upon the sovereignty and democracy of nations."
First, the lighter part.
I'm sure the Daily Ardmoreite is getting as much out of this as they can.
The Texas GOP has the Chicken D's playing cards in PDF format for download, a la the cards the US government issued to find important Iraqi officials. They are in alphabetical order and look pretty nice. I don't see any reverse-side art, however. Someone needs to get on that pronto.
The Dems apparently won't accept their daily pay while AWOL. Also, the Oklahoma House passed (47 to 44) a resolution authored by Rep. David Braddock comending the missing Dems.
TexasISD.com reports a rumor of Democrat return:
The buzz is that members will return Friday after the deadline for Major House bills passes at midnight on Thursday.
The Dems have sent (PDF) a letter and a "Declaration in Defense of Self-Determination" to Speaker Craddick. The letter, signed by Rep. Jim Dunnam, places much of the blame for the fiasco on "Washington Republicans" and a "misplaced priority" to push for congressional redistricting. It also politely asks to stop law enforcement from "following and staking out" the AWOL members' "loved ones." It's a very calm plea, but the following Declaration is much more forthright.
A Declaration in Defense of Self-Determination We must defend against the use of raw political power used to attack the constitutional and natural inalienable rights of the people. The national Republican Party, through state legislatures in Texas and Colorado, is currently attempting to obstruct the will of the people in determining their elected representatives in the U. S. Congress.
In our democracy, power rests with the people. The founding documents of our nation declare the self-evidence of this natural law.
Government is only as strong as the people who choose their representatives through elections, through their consent granting government its legitimacy.
One of the great distinctions of our country and our state is its individualism. When Texans elect representatives, they elect individuals. In Texas, people who voted for George Bush, Rick Perry and John Cornyn, also voted for a Democratic representative in Congress. The Congressional Republicans argue that those individuals are wrong and that their votes must be denied. But what is wrong is their shameless quest to deprive citizens of their vote.
As common citizens of our nation and as elected officials of our state who believe we must defend these attacks on the natural rights of our people and our Constitution, we are obligated to act. We use the law of the land to break a quorum and stop this raw misuse of political power.
Our aim is right. Our means are right.
It is for this very reason that government has principles -- the natural laws of the Declaration of Independence -- and it has rules by which we govern, such as the rule of a quorum. Our founding fathers created the rule of a quorum as a prescription for the ill occasion in which we now find ourselves.
Issued May 13, 2003
at Ardmore, Oklahoma
Tom Delay asked for federal help in bringing the Dems back.
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay said Monday he wants federal authorities to pursue Texas Democrats dodging a vote on a plan he authored to increase Republican seats in Congress.The Sugar Land Republican told reporters that bringing in either U.S. marshals or FBI agents is justified because redistricting is a federal issue, involving congressional seats.
"If it is legal for them to do so, I think it would nice for them to help out the Texas Rangers and the Texas troopers," DeLay said.
Spokesmen for the Justice Department and FBI indicated those agencies likely would have no reason to assist the state officers in apprehending the Democrats whose absence has deprived the state House of a quorum needed to do business.
UPDATE(10/12/2003 9:32pm)
Big News: a plan has been finalized and passed by both the House and the Senate.
Another Monopoly money blow to the American Dollar. I'll miss the monochromatic days of yore.
“The soundness of a nation’s currency is essential to the soundness of its economy. And to uphold our currency’s soundness, it must be recognized and honored as legal tender and counterfeiting must be effectively thwarted,” said Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan in prepared remarks for the ceremony at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.
Now that the runaway Dems have made national news, I figured I'd check in on their website to see if they have any official word on the affair. I wasn't disappointed.
Texas Democratic Party Chairwoman Molly Beth Malcolm commended the House Democrats who successfully stopped Tom DeLay and Tom Craddick from forcing congressional redistricting onto the House agenda today."The Democrats in the Texas House of Representatives have taken a stand on principle. They are not going to allow themselves to be run over by Tom DeLay, Tom Craddick, and the rest of the far right-wing Republicans who care more about their party's agenda than what is best for Texas. The Republicans will attempt to call them obstructionists. They are heroes. Like the Killer Bees and the Dirty 30, they are showing what true courage and true commitment are all about. Wherever they may be, they should know that Texas Democrats are rock solid in support of them. They will triumph in the end. Redistricting was the last straw in a series of outrageous, iron-fisted power plays by Speaker Tom Craddick. If Mr. Craddick wants to know who caused this, he should look in the mirror," said Chairwoman Malcolm.
There's also a direct statement from the dissenters themselves.
We did not choose our path, Tom Delay did. We are ready to stand on the House floor and work day and night to deal with real issues facing Texas families. At a time when we are told there is no time to deal with school finance, and when we must still resolve issues like the state budget crisis and insurance reform, the fact that an outrageous partisan power grab sits atop the House calendar is unconscionable.Our House rules, including those regarding a quorum, were adopted precisely to protect the people from what is before the House today - the tyranny of a majority.
The redistricting plan scheduled today before the Texas House of Representatives is the ultimate in political greed - it is undemocratic, unjust and unprecedented. It's a power grab by Tom DeLay, pure and simple. The current congressional plan has been ruled by our United States Supreme Court to be constitutional and in compliance with the Voting Rights Act. Elections have been held, and we should respect the will of Texas voters.Our Republican Attorney General ruled that this map can stand for the decade, and that we are not mandated to do redraw congressional districts this session. Many Republicans privately oppose it. Texas newspapers have editorialized against it. We do redistricting every ten years, not whenever those in power demand it.
UPDATE(9:30pm)
Bill Hobbs describes this kind of action as "breaking the law in an effort to thwart democracy." I think he's called it correctly.
UPDATE(10/12/2003 9:31pm)
Big News: a plan has been finalized and passed by both the House and the Senate.
Texas House Seeks Arrest of Truant Dems
State troopers and the elite Texas Rangers were ordered to track down and bring in 59 Democratic lawmakers who brought the Texas House to a standstill Monday by going into hiding.The quorum-busting boycott capped months of tension between Democrats and the newly-in-control Republicans over a bill to limit lawsuits and a GOP budget that would make deep spending cuts without raising taxes.
It also came just before scheduled debate on a congressional redistricting plan Democrats say was forced onto the agenda by Republican leaders in Washington.
GOP House Speaker Tom Craddick locked down the chamber so lawmakers who did show up could not leave. After a roll call, he ordered the missing lawmakers arrested and brought back to the chamber.
"It is a disgrace to run and hide," Craddick said. House rules allow for the arrest of members who intentionally thwart a quorum.
Are they so unwilling to give up these "essential" government services that they'll go to lengths like this?
The Texas House cannot convene without at least 100 of the 150 members present. Of the 62 Democrats, 59 were absent as the day's session began. A fourth Democrat Rep. Sylvester Turner showed up in late afternoon.As the hours passed, the House doorkeeper kept watch over the chamber's front door, its historic brass lock turned shut. Inside, lawmakers with nothing to do lobbed toy balls, whistled the "Star Spangled Banner" and dined on white-linen covered tables.
Most of the missing lawmakers said they planned to leave the state to avoid arrest, and late Monday the Texas Department of Public Safety asked the public for help in finding the lawmakers.
This is how they act after they get booted from power after decades. Pathetic.
UPDATE(5/13 8:45am)
The "Killer Ds" were in Ardmore, Oklahoma, sick with the Boo Hoo Flu. Also, there were prior reports indicating that the Dems might do this.
DPS is listing the missing House members in a press release:
Roberto Alonzo, Dallas
Kevin Bailey, Houston
Lon Burnam, Fort Worth
Gabi Canales, Alice
Jaime Capelo Jr., Corpus Christi
Joaquin Castro, San Antonio
Garnet Coleman, Houston
Robert L. "Robby" Cook III, Eagle Lake
Yvonne Davis, Duncanville
Joseph "Joe" Deshotel, Houston
Dawnna M. Dukes, Austin
Jim Dunnam, Waco
Harold V. Dutton Jr., Houston
Craig Eiland, Galveston
Dan Ellis, Livingston
Juan Escobar, Kingsville
Jessica Farrar, Houston
David Farabee, Wichita Falls
Pete P. Gallego, Alpine
Timoteo "Timo" Garza, Eagle Pass
Ryan A. Guillen, Rio Grande City
Scott Hochberg, Houston
Terri Hodge, Dallas
Mark S. Homer, Paris
Charles L. "Chuck" Hopson, Jacksonville
Jesse W. Jones, Dallas
James E. "Pete" Laney, Hale Center
Ruth Jones McClendon, San Antonio
Jim McReynolds, Lufkin
John Mabry, Waco
Trey Martinez Fischer, San Antonio
Jose Menendez, San Antonio
Joe E. Moreno, Houston
Paul C. Moreno, El Paso
Elliot Naishtat, Austin
Richard J. "Rick" Noriega, Houston
Rene O. Oliveira, Brownsville
Dora F. Olivo, Rosenberg
Aaron Pena, Edinburg
Joseph C. "Joe" Pickett, El Paso
Robert R. Puente, San Antonio
Inocente "Chente" Quintanilla, Tornillo
Richard E. Raymond, Laredo
Allan B. Ritter, Nederland
Eddie Rodriguez, Austin
Patrick M. Rose, Dripping Springs
Jim Solis, Harlingen
Barry B. Telford, Dekalb
Senfronia Thompson, Houston
Carlos I. Uresti, San Antonio
Michael U. "Mike" Villarreal, San Antonio
Miguel D. "Mike" Wise, Weslaco
Steven D. "Steve" Wolens, Dallas
UPDATE(12:17pm)
Rep. Helen Giddings, also AWOL (but not part of the Oklahoma crew) has been arrested and brought back to the Capitol.
UPDATE(9/23/2003 11:15pm)
More here. The redistricting maps are being discussed in the House and Senate after another walkout, this time by the Senate Democrats. They have since returned.
UPDATE(10/12/2003 9:30pm)
Big News: a plan has been finalized and passed by both the House and the Senate.
Suit Seeks to Ban Kids From Eating Oreos
Kids in California may have to give up their Oreos, if a lawsuit filed by a San Francisco public interest lawyer is successful.The lawsuit, filed last week in Marin County superior court, seeks a ban on the black and white cookies, arguing the trans fats that make the filling creamy and the cookie crisp are too dangerous for children to eat.
Stephen Joseph said he filed the suit against Nabisco, the maker of Oreos, after reading articles that said the artificial fat is hidden in most packaged food, though consumers have no way of knowing.
The big difference between this suit and others that have targeted tobacco and McDonald's fast food is that consumers know that tobacco is bad for their health and that McDonald's food contains a lot of fat, Joseph said.
"Trans fat is not the same thing at all. Very few people know about it," he said, explaining that his suit focuses on the fact that trans fats are hidden dangers being marketed to children.
Nabisco taken to task over trans fat's effects
Oreo cookies should be banned from sale to children in California, according to a lawsuit filed by a San Francisco attorney who claims that trans fat -- the stuff that makes the chocolate cookies crisp and their filling creamy -- is so dangerous children shouldn't eat it.Stephen Joseph, who filed the suit against Nabisco last week in Marin County Superior Court, is a public interest lawyer who last battled the city to remove graffiti from traffic signs.
[...]
The suit, the first of its kind in the country, asks for an injunction ordering Kraft Foods to desist from selling Nabisco Oreo Cookies to children in California, because the cookies are made with partially hydrogenated vegetable oil, also called trans fat.
Partially hydrogenated oil is in about 40 percent of the food on grocery store shelves, including most cookies, crackers and microwave popcorn, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
I feel like taking this guy out on a tour of SanFran and spreading the Oreo Gospel to this jackass.
UPDATE(5/16 midnight)
The outcry has made a difference. The suit will be dropped.
Oreo lovers can breathe a big, fat sigh of relief.The San Francisco attorney who made news earlier this week for suing Kraft Inc. to stop the sale of Oreos to California children because the cookies are high in trans fat plans to drop the suit today.
The reason? He's drawn so much media attention that he says he's accomplished what he set out to do -- raise awareness about trans fat, a hidden but dangerous substance in processed food.
"You've got to recognize when you've scored a home run," said Stephen Joseph, who filed the suit against Nabisco on May 1 in Marin County Superior Court. "We have raised the awareness of trans fat to the top of the mountain."
This cartoon hits the nail on the head regarding the rampant hypocrisy most people engage in when discussing "freedom." Religious intolerance (assuming these people have the balls to confront religions other than Christianity and Judaism) should be fought on personal liberty grounds...but don't ever expect consistency in regards to smoking and other choices people make on their own.
Via Samizdata.
UPDATED 8/30/2005 1:55pm
Deadline for the Austin Smoking Ordinance
James Robbins proposes the privization of Iraqi garbage collection
A job for the free market.Here's an idea for the new reconstruction team in Iraq: Privatize the trash hauling.
Garbage is a mounting problem in Baghdad. And there are also lots of people with nothing to do who need money. So find several suitable spots on the outskirts of the city and set up rudimentary landfills. Tell citizens that the Coalition will pay money for garbage, so long as they load it up, haul it out to the dump, and dump it. Figure out a reasonable price, a few dollars per pickup truck load, more for larger vehicles. Make sure the ingress/egress is designed for ease of traverse to prevent traffic jams. Keep the whole thing simple, make the transactions easy for everyone to calculate, and keep rules to a minimum. Then see what happens.
Sorry, Mr. Robbins, but this is not a "free market" you are describing.
A free market in trash cleanup would not be dependent upon government payments ("the Coalition will pay money for...") which can only come from taxation or service fees. Capitalism applied to garbage collection would mean those who want the service would pay for the service and those that do the service are paid for it. US taxpayers would be the entities actually paying for the service, further abstracting the market forces from reality. Also keep in mind that the US has no stronger incentive other than good politics to keep the streets clean. I would submit that this is certainly more of a capitalist approach than your average municipal collection service and such an exposure to some watered-down principles of voluntary transactions are themselves worthy incentives to do this, but the overriding concern now is to make the occupation run as smoothly as possible. Keeping streets clean and the residents happy is one way to do this.
Let's not forget that this would amount to a near-monopoly on the "customer" side of the equation. It would collectivize into a single entity what should be hundreds of thousands of individuals making their own choices based on their values.
Next, we have this "figure out a reasonable price" stuff. How? Do you go around asking Baghdadians what they think is reasonable to pay for x units of trash? Do you experiment with prices to see which ones they think are fair? Or, do you take the honest free market approach and let the actual buyers and sellers determine prices through innumberable and unregulated voluntary exchanges?
The rest of his proposal could be described as "statism lite," resting on the hope that regulations (which are antithetical to a free market, and yet he outright assumes they'd have to exist) would be in the hands of those enlightened enough to keep them simple, understandable, and efficient. Needless to say, that doesn't cut it in a real free market, the header Mr. Robbins choose to name his idea under.
The rest of his article flows from the well-known efficiencies freer markets create.
My guess is that Baghdad will have cleaner streets, young men who might otherwise be looting or agitating will be organizing garbage collection -- sub-economies will probably sprout too, territories being claimed and organized by various methods, not all of them savory. But it will get the job done.
The Coalition does not have the manpower to cope with garbage removal, and trying to establish a centrally controlled system to do it will bring all the benefits of Soviet-style economics to liberated Iraq. If the Coalition just sets the terms for market-based activity, Iraqi entrepreneurs will come out of the woodwork to organize it and get things done. It has to work better than doing nothing.
Obviously there are substantial differences between his proposition and what the USSR put into place through a form of Marxism-Leninism. From my perspective, his scheme is far more preferable than anything possible under Ba'athism or Soviet rule.
But he is wrong to say his plan is a free market solution because it is not fundamentally different from other collectivist scenarios.
Frustrated, U.S. Arms Team to Leave Iraq
This article on the Sunday front page of the Washington Post is very disturbing.
The group directing all known U.S. search efforts for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is winding down operations without finding proof that President Saddam Hussein kept clandestine stocks of outlawed arms, according to participants.The 75th Exploitation Task Force, as the group is formally known, has been described from the start as the principal component of the U.S. plan to discover and display forbidden Iraqi weapons. The group's departure, expected next month, marks a milestone in frustration for a major declared objective of the war.
U.S. Central Command began the war with a list of 19 top weapons sites. Only two remain to be searched. Another list enumerated 68 top "non-WMD sites," without known links to special weapons but judged to have the potential to offer clues. Of those, the tally at midweek showed 45 surveyed without success.
At nearly every top-tier "sensitive site" the searchers reached, intruders had sacked and burned the evidence that weapons hunters had counted on sifting. As recently as last Tuesday, nearly a month after Hussein's fall from power, soldiers under the Army's V Corps command had secured only 44 of the 85 top potential weapons sites in the Baghdad area and 153 of the 372 considered most important to rebuilding Iraq's government and economy.McPhee saw early in the war that the looters were stripping his targets before he could check them. He cut the planning cycle for new missions -- the time between first notice and launch -- from 96 to 24 hours. "What we found," he said, was that "as the maneuver units hit a target they had to move on, even 24 hours was too slow. By the time we got there, a lot of things were gone."
Some information known in Washington, such as inventories of nuclear sites under supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency, did not reach the teams assigned to visit them. But what the U.S. government did not know mattered more than what it did know. Intelligence agencies had a far less accurate picture of Iraq's weapons program than participants believed at the outset of their search, they recalled."We came to bear country, we came loaded for bear and we found out the bear wasn't here," said a Defense Intelligence Agency officer here who asked not to be identified by name. "The indications and warnings were there. The assessments were solid."
The "not enough forces" debate will flare up again and this time the pro-war people must acknowledge that regardless of whatever genius (or not) basis the original plan was concieved upon, the forces there were simply trying to do too much with too little. Fight the war. Hunt for leaders. Protect civil infrastructure and the peace after the front line moves on. Help with humanitarian aid. Search for weapons of mass destruction. This is a failure and it needs to be acknowledged, principally because it was a failure that could have been easily prevented at the outset, either by starting the troop buildup earlier or waiting for the 4th Infantry Division to deploy before crossing the Kuwati border.
Essentially, this failure to find WMD reflects very badly (in my opinion) on the planning and intelligence side of the Bush administration. After all has been said and done to this point, it mislead us to a degree and then was too incompetent to eliminate two of the larger and obvious potential roadblocks to finding the WMDs: enough forces to effectively neutralize any threats to site integrity and accurate and timely intel. Of course, there may have been the discoveries we were expecting and perhaps they are being kept under wraps to be revealed later. There would have to be a powerful strategic or tactical incentive to do that before I agree with it.
I still believe we will find some direct and incontrovertible proof of Saddam's programs and the weapons themselves. I also believe that there is a lot more to look at in Iraq and by no means has the search combed a majority of the land in the country. Part of my support for the war on Iraq was based on these WMD. The larger part is based on the idea that this is an important secondary (Afghanistan being the primary and initial) step in the context of a larger war on terrorism. But this is an ugly, ugly black eye for Bush and I won't forget about it.
I once asked my readers to not forget Mr. Blair's party background. Through a Two--Four post, I've discovered evidence of Mr. Blair's choice of associations.
He's a Vice-President of the Socialist International.
UPDATE(7/21/2003 11:00pm)
Well, social democrat may be more apt, because he can say some things a socialist would choke on. His speech to the US Congress last week contains some things which would sicken true leftists. His vocal support for human liberty is of course tempered by his love of the state, which requires a sustained reduction in human liberty in order to survive and have the ability to interfere in human affairs.
I dunno why, but I am never buying Oroweat bread again. For the second straight time, after less than four days in the pantry, the damn bread got moldy and had to be trashed. No other bread (and I've gone through quite a few brands and products) has performed as badly as this. They were all from the same HEB; it can't be a simple case of store employee incompetence.
I really like this bread, too. The product in question is their "100% Whole Wheat" and it has the highest percentage of dietary fiber than other wheat breads in the store at the same price. It's a heavier, thicker slice and texture than the cheaper brands. It's almost perfect for the kinds of sandwiches I like. Additionally, it did not give me this trouble the first time I bought it several months ago. Since that first batch, though, the shit just molds out too quickly, starting from the bottom and working it's way around the sides.
The first time I experienced this, I chalked it up to an accident on my part or the store's. When I went in to buy this latest loaf, I double-checked the package and looked for any signs of deterioration and found none. There is no indication on the packaging that there is an expiration date, though of course I am aware (painfully, at this point) bread does in fact mold and rot and go bad.
So I refuse to buy Oroweat (and what's up with the spelling of the company name?) bread for the rest of this year. There are several brands that come close to the fiber content I'm looking for and hopefully the taste and texture.
City council OKs less severe smoking ban
Austin's city council gave its tentative approval Thursday night to a smoking ban that was less severe than an earlier proposal but would still eliminate smoking where owners and patrons most wanted it - bars and music venues.
Any final regulations are still at least two weeks away, but they will almost certainly be less austere than the total ban endorsed by outgoing mayor Gus Garcia.Council Member Will Wynn - who will replace Garcia next month - and council members Jackie Goodman and Raul Alvarez all came out against the ban. That left Garcia clinging to a majority with Danny Thomas, Daryl Slusher and Betty Dunkerley.
The new proposal will require at least one more council vote in two weeks.
Thomas, Slusher, and Dunkerley are now all on my shit list. There is still time to reverse this course and they are the ones to watch.
Slusher said he wanted to allow smoking on patios and near the entrance of bars, both forbidden under Garcia's proposal. Dunkerley asked for exemptions on bingo parlors, fraternal organizations and perhaps billiard parlors.Dunkerley said she was torn by the health benefits of eliminating second-hand smoke and the financial threat a ban might pose for bars and music venues.
"Those are my two most important issues - economic development and health," Dunkerley said. "I've been trying to find a good compromise where those venues won't be hurt."
The current ordinance restricts smoking in some restaurants, particularly those where smokers and non-smokers are not separated by a wall. But the city has few rules on smoking in bars and music venues, some of which rely on smokers for the majority of their business.
When he initially proposed a smoking ban, Garcia said he would probably allow the exclusion of bars and venues because including them might make it harder to pass an ordinance.But restaurant owners, particularly those next to bars, complained that the different standards put them at a disadvantage. Then New York City, one of America's bar-smoke capitals, added a total ban.
Garcia followed suit, removing exemptions from his proposal to the point that smoking would be allowed in homes, the outdoors and few other places. Patrons would have had to go 25 feet away from an establishment's front door to light up a cigarette.
The proposal drew cheers from health groups, who said it would protect customers and employees.But it started a revolt among bar and venue owners already wrestling with a down economy. They warned that the restrictions would chase away customers wanting to stay home with their ashtrays.
Proponents of the ban said the owners' concerns were groundless. They produced surveys showing most Austinites would go out more to smoke-free buildings. They also provided studies and testimonials from other places that have outlawed smoking.
"Most are fine" means "some are fucked."
While business owners have said the city should put off a vote at least until both sides can discuss the issue, health groups have pushed for immediate action. Any lengthy delay might kill the issue altogether ? Wynn's opposition will become an enormous hurdle when he replaces Garcia.
UPDATE(6/2/2003 5:21PM)
Developments! The final vote is days away.
UPDATE(6/6/2003 7:27am)
The ban has passed 4-3. Fuckers.
UPDATE(6/7/2003 8:30pm)
How the city plans to enforce this:
The ban will be enforced on a complaint basis, handled by Health and Human Services.
Any person caught violating the ban can be fined up to $2,000 and an establishment could have its operating license revoked.
UPDATE(10/15/2003 2:03am)
Good news: the Austin Smoking Task Force Report is in and it's definitely worth your read.
UPDATE(4/21/2004 4:14pm)
The ban, initially scheduled to take affect on May 1st, has been posponed:
The city of Austin's new smoking ordinance will likely be postponed a month until June 1. The main reason is to give restaurants more time to show they've improved their air quality.
Dan McClusky's owner Steve Batlin lucked out. His restaurant has always had a separate room for non-smokers and smokers."I really don't think it's necessary. I'm a non-smoker myself. I think it's coming," Batlin said.
The new smoking ordinance is coming, but now it may be one month later. Before they get a smoking permit, restaurants must show they have dual ventilation systems. Lots of business owners installed them to meet the previous ordinance, but the city didn't keep a list.
Copyright ©2004TWEAN News Channel of Austin, L.P. d.b.a. News 8 Austin
UPDATE(6/1/2004 11:03am)
Austin Smoking Ban in Effect Today
UPDATED 5/9/2005 9:03am
The Additional Tyranny - The New Austin Smoking Ban Passes
UPDATED 8/30/2005 2:00pm
Deadline for the Austin Smoking Ordinance
Man, I go out and buy the two DVDs of Samurai X that I've been wanting for so long...and then they go out and do this. All four episodes on one disc plus previously-unreleased footage.
At least it's cheap. *grumble*
Why is everyone all of a sudden searching for what is the name of Versace's cheaper line of clothing or some variant? You're getting my February 2003 archive, which happens to have those words in it.
Go to the source, people.
Recognize the folly of concealed weapons
Early Friday morning, two men and a woman were shot to death on a Kansas City street.
Just hours later in Jefferson City, the Missouri Senate approved legislation to let residents have concealed weapons on their persons, in purses and briefcases, and in their cars.
The paradox is disturbing: While three people were shot to death, lawmakers were trying to pass concealed-carry legislation that would increase the dangers of gunplay in the state.
The Senate action, and passage of similar legislation by the House, fails to answer the fundamental question: Why does Missouri need concealed-carry legislation?
Missouri doesn't need such legislation because self-defense is a fundamental right, as is the freedom to choose how best to do it. But since there are people like this author out there who would restrict that right through laws, some people have decided that the best way to keep this right alive is to formally enact it through legislation.
Its supporters argue that people should be allowed to defend themselves with firearms. But adults in Missouri already have the right to carry firearms and to have them in their cars or homes. We don't need to create more situations where we wonder who is carrying what.
Supporters of concealed-carry also like to talk about how often Americans use firearms in self-defense. Estimates vary from less than a million to three million times a year. No one can say for certain how often concealed weapons were used in those situations and how effective they were.
Supporters also note that 43 states already issue concealed-carry permits. But that doesn't justify bad policy.
Encouraging people to carry hidden weapons is not a good solution to gun violence. Let's hope that at some point more of Missouri's elected representatives recognize this and reject concealed carry.
I'm against these laws because it shouldn't even have to be codified into law and often there is a host of restrictions imposed on the license applicant. But since our reality has not yet reached the point where this admittedly lesser matter becomes a primary concern, I'll support concealed gun laws. Especially if people continue to assert I have no right to firearm-derived self-defense.
Steven Den Beste has two excellent posts on atheism and theism.
Is my atheism that of a "proof atheist" or a "belief atheist"? Using his definitions, I think I straddle the line between them. I believe that reason and logic are primary and the correct application of them results in axioms and infallible answers. Therefore, I also believe that at some point in our future (or perhaps we have already reached this point and just can't explain it properly), we will have accumulated enough knowledge to conclusively prove that deities do not exist, nor does the "supernatural." I don't go around an attempt to proselyte those who disagree with me, which has happened to me before numerous times.
There are many good arguements against theism, but the only good arguement for it that I've heard is utilitarian (religion provides people with a system of morals, values, and ethics) and doesn't elevate it above atheism, which isn't a unified philosophy that asserts the absence or irrelevance of morals, values, and ethics. Believing or not believing in a deity is merely a part of a person's philosophy and doesn't dictate how the person thinks about other things.
Dear Pastor or Staff My name is Dennis Mount, I have been a pastor and evangelist for almost 30 years. About four years ago I resigned my church and went full time into evangelism and the music ministryI sing traditional and Southern Gospel music. I am very flexible and can accommodate most needs, whether it be just a couple of songs for your special service, or a concert. And I supply my own sound equipment which is top of the line.
I would like to mention that I have recently completed a new album entitled "Looking Toward Heaven" which is all Southern Gospel. It is being aired on KWFC radio station, The largest Gospel Station in SW Missouri. You can listen to sample clips form it and all my albums on my website. If your people enjoy Traditional and Southern Gospel music, then I know they will be blessed by our ministry.
If your church is located in the central part of the United States then we (my wife and I) would like very much to come to your church and minister to your people, I am sure we would be a blessing to them.
We are now booking concerts and meetings for the rest of this year and beyond. You can check my schedule on my web site for open dates or just give me a call. We are willing to travel some distance as long as the church (or Churches) will cover our travel expenses. For more details see booking information on my web site . www.DLMount.com
If you feel the distance is to great for us to come, please share your thoughts with us concerning this matter. We might be able in the future to schedule a tour through your area. I invite you to take a minute and visit my web site and listen to some of my songs. I am sure you will find something to your liking.
We are full time in this ministry which allows us to schedule concerts & meetings anytime during the week if you desire. Unlike some who are full time we do not have a set minimum fee to come to your church. But Please keep in mind this is our source of income and the wear and tear on our sound equipment, vehicle expenses and living expenses between meetings.If you would like additional information please go to my website at www.DLMount.com there you will find a large list of churches we have been to, pastoral references, sample sound clip of my music, my albums, and much more.
If you need me to send you a brochure, list of reference, and a schedule to present to your church's committee please let me know and I will immediately send them to your church by regular mail. Don't forget to include your church's name, full mailing address and phone number when requesting this information.
You can contact me at the following:
D L Mount
809 N Grant
Springfield, MO. 65802
417-862-5168If you have additional questions E-mail me at: DLMount@DLMount.com
I am looking forward to hearing from you.In His Service
Dr. D. L. MountP.S. If by some chance I have reached you in error, then I apologize. If you are not a pastor or staff member please pass this along to your pastor or Just click on this Link and press the send button and your name will be taken off my list.
There's the hook! Screw this pleasant tip-toeyness. Just line up pastors and preachers to pray under and make sure to include the pictures of their attractive single daughters. People need more of an incentive than, "You'll turn out great in the afterlife!" There are those nagging Earthly impulses that gotta be rewarded. Attendance would soar! An important demographic (young males) would be better represented! And those poor, lonely cute women just might find the man of their dreams!
...
Perhaps I'm just being too realistic.
...he'd put a stop to this bullshit right now
New tariffs by the U.S. Commerce Department against Canadian wheat farmers "will be fought with everything we've got," Canada's minister responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board said Friday.Ralph Goodale told CBC Newsworld the real problem is low farm incomes, and he placed blame for that on hefty subsidies by the U.S. and Europe which have caused over-production and driven down prices.
The department said Friday that it has concluded the Canadian Wheat Board is dumping wheat on the U.S. market, meaning it sells for less than the Canadian domestic price or the cost of production.
There will be a new tariff of eight per cent on durum wheat and six per cent for hard red spring wheat. Those charges are in addition to a four per cent tariff imposed earlier this year.
Via Drudge comes an interesting story about Ashton Kutcher's partying, specifically the time he spent with the Jenna and Barbara Bush. Drudge's link emphasizes the fact they partied together, but within the story is something better, in my opinon. Says Kutcher in a Rolling Stone interview:
"So we're hanging out ... The Bushes were underage drinking at my house. When I checked outside, one of the Secret Service guys asked me if they'd be spending the night. I said no. And then I go upstairs to see another friend and I can smell the green wafting out under his door. I open the door, and there he is smoking out the Bush twins on his hookah."
This isn't the first time Jenna has been linked to pot use, and it's highly likely Barbara also has a history of marijuana smoking; it's just never been the focus of a National Enquirer story.
There's a good sarcastic point to make about this, tying in the War on Drugs, the President's history of substance abuse, and political hypocrisy...but for some reason it just eludes me...
Caped Crusader Saves the Day in English Town
A masked and caped do-gooder has been sweeping through an English town, performing good deeds and scattering terrified bad guys, a local newspaper reported.
The Kent and Sussex Courier said Friday it had received letters from "stunned residents" of the town of Tunbridge Wells, southeast of London, who saw the man in a brown mask and cape scare off hooligans and return a woman's dropped purse.
"To my great surprise," the paper quoted 21-year-old psychology student Ellen Neville as saying, "a masked man wearing a brown cape rushed past me to assist a woman who was having a bother with a group of youths."He swept in, broke up the commotion and ran off, leaving myself and the woman in a state of shock," she said.
I think it's great someone wishes to do this. Of course, the person must remain anonymous. Otherwise he or she may be slapped with stupid laws that protect criminals just for being criminals.
To some great examples of leftist hate and intolerance
I like this one the best.
George Bush is the most arrogant, despicable, horrible excuse for a human being I can possibly imagine...He is filth...
She's very concerned about Texas
Don't worry about a thing! The Texas Legislature is riding to the rescue. Oh, sure, we still have a $10 billion deficit, but the House just outlawed gay marriage. At last, we're safe from the hideous threat of gay marriage, which would have directly ruined our entire lives.
Meanwhile, the House has:
Eliminated 10,810 state jobs;
Cut 250,000 poor children off the Children's Health Insurance Program and about 365,000 from health insurance through Medicaid;
Cut prenatal care and delivery for 17,000 pregnant women and services for 366 women with breast and cervical cancer;
Closed one state school for the mentally retarded and one state mental hospital;
Cut $22 million from a criminal justice program that provides medication and treatment for mentally impaired offenders who are out on probation or parole. (Isn't that nice? They'll be wandering around the state without their meds.)
I say those who want to help others should do so to the best of their ability. End of issue. She says that's all nice and fine, but it's not enough...it's never enough. People should be forced to pay for those needs.
During the days of debate in the House, three of the top donors to Texans for Lawsuit Reform sat in the House gallery along with the speaker's wife. This section of the gallery was christened "The Owners' Box" by Democrats, and that's just what it was. The Texas Observer ran the records on TRL's top donors and found that Dick Weekly, of Weekly Homes, has been named a defendant in 10 civil suits in Harris County since the start of 2002, four involving deceptive trade allegations. Harlan Crow, son of construction magnate Trammell Crow, has been named in 16 civil suits since 1986. But the winner is Bob Perry of Perry Homes, sued more than 60 times in the past 15 years. And now, they're free at last.
Unless, of course, the Senate should come through for us. Tort deform in the Senate goes to the committee headed by Bill Ratliff, former lieutenant governor (he would have run for the office last time but Karl Rove nixed him) and a notoriously civilized Republican. Upon Senate passage of a budget that, while not as bad as the House version, still takes aim directly at poor children so under-taxed Texas corporations will not have to pay a single additional nickel, Ratliff made a moving speech in which he rebuked his colleagues: "I don't think this is worthy of the great state of Texas."
Is there any constituency more important, more cherished, more fragile, more subject to political manipulation than poor fucking children!?!? She's appealing to your pity to shame you into agreeing with her. She knows there is no obligation to these kids other than an emotional one, so she'll press on with this as her primary arguement.
If we're to base our standards on reducing the number of poor kids/pregnant or cancerous women who get hurt, then our world is utterly doomed and no amount of government spending will fix it. You can only take socialism so far before it isn't money than needs redistribution in order to solve problems; it's people's behavior and their value systems.
You'll be happy to know that Bill Zedler, R-Tarrant, has introduced a bill concerning pubic hair (about which I cannot say more, since the rest of the bill is totally unprintable). Zedler's against pubic hair. We still have a $10 billion deficit. I love living under Republican governance.
Stupid Republicans are just as bad as Utopic Democrats.
I wasn't aware there was a National Campaign to Stop Red Light Running.
Cutting Medicaid, CHIP will cost state the matching funds
Texas won't be taking all the money the federal government is willing to give it under the budget proposals passed last month by the House and Senate.
Both chambers try to limit spending on programs such as Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, through which the state lures several federal dollars for every dollar it puts up.
Budget writers say they're not happy about cutting off the flow of federal cash. But with Texas facing a $9.9 billion budget hole, they say, they can't afford to spend any more on the health programs ? especially because they believe the programs are serving some people who don't really need state help.
It's almost funny.
I read about the major candidates for the Austin elections and still didn't vote. Wynn won the mayoral post by a landslide and the ACC tax increases have passed. My energies were best spent with friends on election day. I felt throughly apolitical at the time.
"Spanish Key" is just an amazing track. Why haven't I picked up Davis earlier is a mystery that I'll solve only after I acquire the mind-strength necessary in order to understand women.
It has substantial Senate support
Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst unveiled his school funding proposal Wednesday and said all 31 members of the Senate have signed onto the plan that would cut property taxes in half and expand and increase the state sales tax, replacing the current share-the-wealth system."People are tired of ever-increasing local property taxes and yet they want to make sure that our schools are funded well," Dewhurst said at a news conference in front of an Austin home as more than 20 state senators stood behind him.
Dewhurst was praised by several educator groups for his plan, which also calls for voters to approve a constitutional amendment so a state property tax can be established.
Then there's this:
Property taxes would be cut in half under an ambitious new public school finance plan unveiled by Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst and all 31 state senators Wednesday.The flip side is that the state sales tax will be increased and expanded to include many services not presently captured.
[...]
Under the new plan, sales tax would be extended to include legal fees but not medical services. Sales tax on vehicles would also increase. Dewhurst said the current 6.25 percent sales tax would increase to 7.5 percent or to 7.85 percent.
Dewhurst is increasing our tax burden and casting a wider net to collect more of our money to solve a problem that is not only one the government created, but one the government (and the gawddamn public) wishes to perpetuate by continuing to fund K-12 education. I simply cannot agree to this.
Interesingly, Governor Perry and House Speaker Craddick are doing their own thing:
While Dewhurst says there is adequate time to tackle the school funding issue, Gov. Rick Perry disagrees and the House was moving forward on another track.A day earlier, the House gave preliminary approval to legislation that would repeal the current school financing system in 2004. The measure by Rep. Kent Grusendorf, R-Arlington, also would give schools an additional $1.2 billion in funding while lawmakers figure out a new financing system.
While the bus ride had the feel of a grade-school field trip, including a rowdier crowd at the back of the bus, the made-for-TV event had the markings of a campaign stop, down to the tape on the lawn showing each senator where to stand. On the ride back to the Capitol, everyone ate ice cream or Popsicles.Dewhurst had every reason to be happy: An hour earlier, he had gone to each senator's desk and persuaded all 31 to sign as co-sponsors to Senate Bill 2, a rare occurrence for a school tax plan that not all of them had finished reading.
These politicians are completely fucking pathetic.
Perry and Craddick say the Senate has the bus going backward: Those two want to study the cost of improving education, then give Texans property tax relief in a special session next year.Acting on his own, Dewhurst is steering toward more immediate tax relief.
Whether Dewhurst succeeds or fails, Austin consultant Tony Proffitt sees no risk for the lieutenant governor but problems for the governor, the speaker and House members.
"He is attacking one of the most hated taxes in Texas," Proffitt said of Dewhurst. "He is providing leadership, and he looks strong."
Proffitt said Texans might ask why Perry, Craddick and House members didn't jump at the chance to cut their property taxes.
"He is in front of the school bus," Proffitt said, "and that puts Craddick and Perry sitting in the back."
[...]
The split among the state's Republican leadership is fueling the gossip mill.
The speculation at the Capitol has been that U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison is eyeing a gubernatorial run against Perry. Hutchison's departure would open a senate seat. Dewhurst came close to running for the Senate in 2002, when former Texas Sen. Phil Gramm retired.
"It certainly is an advantage for both (Sen. Hutchison's) ambition and (Dewhurst's) ambition if the governor seems to be following rather than leading," said Harvey Kronberg, editor of the political newsletter Quorum Report.
Dewhurst and his aides dismiss the speculation, saying the lieutenant governor already has endorsed Perry for re-election.
In fact, there's been an interesting role reversal between Craddick and Dewhurst. Craddick was the first state official to say the current school finance system had to go this session.
Dewhurst began campaigning last year to end it by 2005. He began moving up the deadline as his election opponent beat up on him and polls showed the public's unrest over property taxes.
Perry's comment that Dewhurst and Craddick were too inexperienced to tackle the issue this session only cemented the new lieutenant governor's resolve to do it now.
There is some worthwhile debate about which causes the least harm to consumers, property or sales taxes. Property taxes punish you for owning property while sales taxes punish you for consuming goods and services. But both distort their respective markets and both are synonyms for sanctioned theft.
As I have said before, the solution is obvious: tuition should be paid for by those who wish to enroll in an educational service. An education is not an entitlement nor is it a right. This is doubly true if in order to pay for that education, money must be taken from other people without their permission. Why, exactly, must I help pay for my neighbor's K-12 experience? Why must he help with mine?
Dewhurt's bill is SB 2 and there is no information about it online yet.
UPDATE(4/28/2004 9:29am)
The proposed solutions for Texas school financing aren't any better.