From: "pelletoun" sibillanone@o2.pl
To: "Odazio" drizz@drizzten.com
Subject: hey
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:12:34 -0800Question Odazio,
Seriously people, there are more effective ways to begin a fraudulent advertisement than this.
Listen up, Monty told me on Wednesday that ur wife been not satified
with u
recently.
I can assist with that. Come see www.rxaig.org/ib/. I've been using
them
for a couple months now and nothing but praises for them.
effects of crime and evil upon the human soul-his later. impropriety to
do
so. Moreover, Baumer renounces his brotherhood .
ould repeat in an audience member’s life as well (Desjardens).After all
the
people are killed, all the futures damned, and all the plots become
undone,
the .
It failed.
hope this was helpful
cristoubel
What the hell is up with spammers? Are they simply leaving the production of the e-mail text up to drunken, one-handed Ecuadorian vagrants suffering from a mild case of schizophrenia? Besides the occasional accidental wisdom in spam and the rare lighthearted moments, spam is drudgingly awful.
Subject lines are terrible. Sometimes they are stupidly offensive. And the content isn't any better.
Really folks. This is toilet scum-level work here. You disgrace yourself with every click of the Send button. Find some honest work for gawd's sake.
ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.
It's all about the .001%
If I send out 1000 emails (for free) and .001% respond, that's 1 sale. $3 in my pocket for $0 advertising expenses.
If I send out 1000000 emails (for free) and .001% respond, thats 10000 sales. $30,000 in my pocket for $0 advertising expenses.
Regardless of the actual response rate, it can be very small and the spammer still makes money.
But any talk of making e-mail cost money, and that is immediately discounted as ridiculous, even though the free nature of e-mail is what allows spam to work.
If you want to get rid of spam, EVERYONE needs to stop replying. But there are some so uneducated or too busy to realize sometimes that a message even is spam.
Technology is not the answer this time. People are the answer, and you can't solve people.
Posted by: The Flamingo King on March 22, 2006 12:52 PM