October 26, 2005
Terrorist Organizations of the Past vs. Terrorist Organizations of Today

In the Middle East, in the period between 1968 and 1990, terrorism was used by secular transnational organizations from various regions such as the Palestinian Liberation Front, Black June of Palestine, the Red Brigades in Italy, the Basque Fatherland in Spain, First of October Anti-Fascist Resistance Group in Spain, Peoples Struggles and People's Resistance Groups in Iran, the Irish Republican Army in Belfast, the Tupamaros of Paraguay and Argentina, and the Shining Path movement in Peru. These secular and socialist movements, with a few exceptions, almost disappeared in the 1990s.

-Understanding Terrorism: Threats in an Uncertain World, 2004, page 69

Why?

This is a question that I rarely see asked and answered during the thousands of hours/pages of talking-head/written journalism expended over the last four years. When I grew up in the 1980's, "terrorist" meant one of two things: either you were a European radical trying to scare the authorities into giving up imprisoned fellow travelers or you were trying to scare people out of Israel. The former have nearly gone silent. Why? The quoted passage is from an essay titled "Terrorism, 'True Believers,' and the Attack on Globalization" and was written by Sheldon Smith. He hits on something and attempts to explain it on the next page, but doesn't really satisfy.

You'd think that the near-total inactivity (or growing ineptitude or inability to find support) of a spectrum of violent organizations over a relatively clearly-defined timeline would generate more interest. After 9/11, we plagued ourselves with counter-terrorism questions.

The only reason I can think of that intellectuals and academics didn't tear open this subject is because they think what the world faced then is not the same as what the world faces now. If the two operate on vastly different premises, the solution for one isn't likely to be the solution for the other. For example:

  • Secular vs. religious
  • Keen on gaining popular support vs. apocalyptic indifference towards persuasion
  • Politically ideological vs. emotionally results-oriented

At least, that's my crude outline.

If anyone has any resources on this idea, please send them this way.



Posted by Drizzten at October 26, 2005 10:52 PM

ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.

Comments
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.

HTML formatting is disabled. However, you may post a raw URL as it will show up as a clickable link.

Comments are the property and responsibilty of the commenter.

I reserve the right to delete any comment I wish as this is my property you are commenting upon, but I'm pretty laid-back so it isn't likely to happen unless you are some psycho idiot jerk. Oh, and unless you have my permission to promote your good or service, you are wasting your time: unsolicited advertisements will result in comment deletion and URL banning. This blog ain't for you spammers or the crap you want to sell.


Dislike the format, layout, color, or having a hard time reading the text? Comment here and let me know what you think.

Remember info?



Back to the top