The Web is alive with Ayn Rand tributes.
I own The Fountainhead, Atlas Shrugged, Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand (I read them in that order, still haven't finished OPAR), and have just ordered Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal and Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology from Amazon.com (the prices were too good to pass up). Though I am far from a thorough understanding of Objectivism and the concepts and axioms it works from, I hope to expand upon what I do understand over the next year.
I consider her contributions to the philosophies of freedom and reason to be critically important and worthy of serious study. Her writing offered to me, for the first time, a moral and objective defense of free-market capitalism, the system I had found myself gravitating towards but found unable to uphold in anything but consequentialist and utilitarian terms. Those terms are useful in debate, but I felt the distinct lack of an ethical dimension to my defenses.
Her work led me to the other nether regions of libertarianism and thus to the Austrian School and anarcho-capitalism. I still find the arguments in Roy Child's The Epistemological Basis of Anarchism: An Open Letter to Objectivists and Libertarians and Objectivism and the State: An Open Letter to Ayn Rand to be very strong objections to the state from a background of Objectivist ethics. I am by no means a "Randian" or a Leonard Peikoff-blessed ARIan or any of the other perjoratives tossed around about some of the Objectivists out there and I do agree that there are at least some areas in her philosophy that either I'm not ready yet to accept or are at the very least confusing or contradictory, but I think that on the whole, she's more right than wrong.
I'll end with a great quote Objectivism Online posted:
In the name of the best within you, do not sacrifice this world to those who are its worst. In the name of the values that keep you alive, do not let your vision of man be distorted by the ugly, the cowardly, the mindless in those who have never achieved his title. Do not lose your knowledge that man's proper estate is an upright posture, an intransigent mind and a step that travels unlimited roads. Do not let your fire go out, spark by irreplaceable spark, in the hopeless swamps of the approximate, the not-quite, the not-yet, the not-at-all. Do not let the hero in your soul perish, in lonely frustration for the life you deserved, but have never been able to reach. Check your road and the nature of your battle. The world you desired can be won, it exists, it is real, it is possible, it's yours.
UPDATED 11:02pm
Here are a few more I came across:
Rand lit the lamp of freedom amidst a modern dark-age of totalitarianism, facist and communist dictatorships, and the prevailing belief in collectivism. The one who lit a lamp rather than just curse the darkness.
To that extent (only) I can appreciate her as an early pioneer of the 60's era "If it feels good do it" mentality. If my only two choices today were assembly-line-age conformity or Randian egoism I'd go with Rand every time. But that's like saying if I had a choice between the Guy Lombardo's Orchestra and the New Christie Minsterals I'd buy a tambourine. Rand isn't the only choice anymore and almost every other choice is objectively better in the sense that they offer more ways to interact without fundamentally compromising one's integrity.
Superficial people condemn almost every real and imagined aspect of this woman and her work, whether they have read anything she wrote or not. Some very fortunate persons have read, absorbed, studied, digested, and applied the principles she presented so clearly, and their lives have changed greatly, for the better. Some have tried to take on the principles she wrote about by short-cutting the learning process, and they crashed, sourly joining her detractors.
I spent my senior year in college completely enthralled with Rand, and then like so many others I mostly got over it. Still, I reread her books every few years which is more than I can say for any other writer. Because of Rand, I refuse to cede the moral highground to leftists who peddle an ideology of self-sacrificial service to others.
By the time I got to "Atlas Shrugged", I was tired of reading about her army of tall, cold, brilliant and miserably driven capitalists. Hell, even Rand was addicted to "Charlie's Angels"! But, props must be given.
"...I'd like to take a moment to doff my cap at the old girl, who would have been 100 today, for showing me that it was possible to write page-turning fiction, which also tackled big--Big--themes."
So, my paper was basically a description of a Jeffersonian minimal state, with laissez-faire capitalism. I don't even remember very much of what I wrote (but I'm sure it was good). What I do remember is the professor's comment. When I got my paper back, I could see that he had written in large, angry, red letters:YOU'VE OBVIOUSLY READ A LOT OF AYN RAND!!
I also remember my immediate thought: Who is He???
ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.
Yes, she was a remarkable human and influenced
me a great deal.
Rand is a little long winded for my taste; and, as a born again Christian, not all her ideals appeal to me.
Look at that sentence! Thoreau would be envious of my use of punctuation!
Posted by: somasoul on February 3, 2005 03:01 PM