April 23, 2004
Derrick Shepherd Should Walk in MY Shoes

Louisiana May Ban Low-Slung Pants

People who wear low-slung pants that expose skin or "intimate clothing" would face a fine of up to $500 and possible jail time under a bill filed by a Jefferson Parish lawmaker.

State Rep. Derrick Shepherd said he filed the bill because he was tired of catching glimpses of boxer shorts and G-strings over the lowered belt lines of young adults.

The bill would punish anyone caught wearing low-riding pants with a fine of as much as $500 or as many as six months in jail, or both.

"I'm sick of seeing it," said Shepherd, a first-term legislator. "The community's outraged. And if parents can't do their job, if parents can't regulate what their children wear, then there should be a law."

Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.


Shit.

If this is the standard lawmakers now use to propose legislation, then I've been mistaking the velocity of the nation's descent towards Hell by a factor of five. This man and the system that supports him are menaces to freedom.

There should be a law against that. Unfortunately, the best one this country possesses has proven to be useless in preventing statist tyranny.



Posted by Drizzten at April 23, 2004 02:04 PM

ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.

Comments

Yes, but it's Louisiana. One has to expect this sort of brilliance from an elected official there (remember David Duke?)

Hopefully, someone in the legislature or the Governor's office will realize how completely stupid this makes them all look. On the other hand, we live in a representative democracy, so these idiots apparently represent their constituents - who get the idiots they deserve.

Posted by: Dennis on April 24, 2004 03:48 PM

I forgot to add: here is that fool's e-mail address

larep087@legis.state.la.us

Posted by: Dennis on April 24, 2004 04:05 PM

To Rep Shepherd:

Just so I've got this straight, this IS the state that's probably best known for Mardi Gras where women show their breasts for plastic beads and people get drunk and vomit or urinate in the streets. Right?

And if it's not just parents who can't or don't control their kids but also people in their 20s and 30s who are fashion conscious and happy with their bodies?

And pregnant women who's tops no longer reach all the way around but are due in a week or so and don't want to have to buy a new one to run to the grocery store?

And toddlers who care not if they're naked in public?

And people on their way to and from the gym?

And do you no longer have summer in Louisiana?

Sounds like a great way to increase state profits without increasing taxes...except who are you planning to pay to enforce this? Shouldn't the police be busy with thing like crime and community safety? And doesn't jail time cost more than $500 and wouldn't all that money spent on enforcing and prosecuting and jailing be better spent on education?

Posted by: Drew on April 26, 2004 01:21 PM

this whole country is turning into communism slowly but surely.

Posted by: dave wuest on April 26, 2004 01:38 PM

Dave - it's been a few decades since I studied political science in college, but I don't think Representative Shepherd's stupid bill reflects the country turning to communism. More likely, it would indicate a fascist ideology, which is on the opposite end of the spectrum. Governmental control of individual behaviors is a fascist theory, while communism, as I recall, focuses on government ownership and control of production. They ain't the same.

Posted by: Dennis on April 26, 2004 05:11 PM

Perhaps Dave is talking about the country's slow grind towards collectivization and away from individualism. Communism's economic control, in any event, must extend into the personal sphere because that's where all economic decisions are ultimately made and implemented. Communists, for all their high-minded rhetoric, are out to control individuals.

Fascism is a better term for what we're dealing with here, though.

Posted by: Drizz on April 27, 2004 08:51 AM

When do you think our generation will hit office? I think its about time we got these old morons with 50's values out of office and actually put some progressives with some idea of what their doing in there.

Posted by: Max on April 29, 2004 09:38 AM

I have written a paper on this because it irritated me so much and i have submitted it to a school newspaper and i will soon send it to larger newspapers, i agree with you on the most part

Posted by: Mark on May 7, 2004 12:36 PM

It is an absolute disgrace the way young people dress. There should definitely be a dress code - cover your caboose, your chest. When I was in school, boys had to tuck in their shirts and wear a belt w/their jeans - girls dresses - pants are fine but there is no pride or respect - whatever happen to nice dress pants and sweater or knit top - the guys jeans are practically falling down - they all need a course on how to dress and behave in public - Wake up parents !!!!

Posted by: sandi C on May 13, 2004 09:57 PM

Well, Sandi, fortunately, we live in the United States and not Afghanistan! Remember the Taliban? That's what you're asking for when you talk about mandating a dress code. I am definitely going to support Mr. Shepherds opposition in 2008.

Posted by: Koatz on May 14, 2004 11:28 AM

Sandi, what we need are fewer people like you who think they have the right to boss others around on how to live concerning the weightiest matters on macroeconomics all the way down to the height of your FUCKING HEMLINE. Of all the *real* problems to be concerned with, of all the *genuine* issues facing Americans today, you think we should fine and jail people for wearing the wrong clothing.

You don't own me or my clothing and I don't own you or your clothing. End. Of. Story.

Posted by: Drizz on May 14, 2004 12:22 PM

Dear Sandi,

Thank you Universal Maternal Unit for your concern towards people who are not your children. Your overbearing over-protection of us is an inspiration to parents the world around who feel that they only have to teach their own children what is right in the world, and not those of others. We need more people making blanket-rules that apply to everyone equally and oppressively.

Posted by: Hiigaran on May 15, 2004 02:28 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.

HTML formatting is disabled. However, you may post a raw URL as it will show up as a clickable link.

Comments are the property and responsibilty of the commenter.

I reserve the right to delete any comment I wish as this is my property you are commenting upon, but I'm pretty laid-back so it isn't likely to happen unless you are some psycho idiot jerk. Oh, and unless you have my permission to promote your good or service, you are wasting your time: unsolicited advertisements will result in comment deletion and URL banning. This blog ain't for you spammers or the crap you want to sell.


Dislike the format, layout, color, or having a hard time reading the text? Comment here and let me know what you think.

Remember info?



Back to the top