I wrote about the City of Austin's authoritarian impulse in the past. Doubt I'll have any less to write about in the future.
City council proposes design standards for new businesses
City leaders want future retail buildings to be more aesthetically pleasing.
Austin City Council passed a resolution Thursday afternoon that would allow city planners to come up with guidelines on how new commercial buildings in Austin should look.
"A national retailer can come in and build their bottom-of-the-barrel design, which is usually a blue, drab concrete wall design," council member Brewster McCracken said.
Council members want to work toward establishing design standards on how the façade of retail buildings should look. A standard could require structures to include better landscaping, more windows or construction materials of a higher quality.
"Austin has the lowest standards of any city in the region. We're just trying to get out of last place," McCracken said.Copyright ©2004TWEAN News Channel of Austin, L.P. d.b.a. News 8 Austin
MOST OF WHAT I WAS GOING TO SPEAK TO YOU ABOUT WAS COVERED AS FAR AS SPECIFIC ELEMENTS OF DESIGN WERE COVERED IN THE POWERPOINT. SO I'D LIKE TO LOOK AHEAD JUST A LITTLE BIT TO WHEN YOU ACTUALLY GET DOWN TO WRITING THE RULES. MY HUNCH IS WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO FIND IS THAT PEOPLE WHO BUILD DEVELOPMENTS AROUND THE CITY ARE GOING TO GIVE RATHER EASILY ON AESTHETIC ELEMENTS SUCH AS SHIELDING AND LANDSCAPING AND FACADES AND WHATNOT AND REALLY PUT UP A FIGHT OVER MAJOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS THE ONE THEY SHOWED, THE TARGET THAT IS TWO STORIES TALL AND USES A HIDDEN PARKING GARAGE INSTEAD OF SURFACE PARKING. SO WHAT I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU IS THAT'S WHERE THE RUBBER HITS THE ROAD. THAT'S ALSO WHERE THE MAIN COST FOR THESE PEOPLE COMES IN. AND THAT'S WHERE THEY ARE GOING TO REALLY SQUAWK WHEN YOU START TO WRITE THE RULES. SO WHAT I WOULD ASK YOU IS PLEASE STICK TO YOUR GUNS. THESE FOLKS ARE USED TO DEALING WITH THESE KINDS OF REQUIREMENTS AROUND THE REST OF THE COUNTRY, AND THERE'S NO REASON WHY THEY CAN'T LIVE WITH THEM HERE. THANK YOU.

ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.
Surely there is no way aesthetics are some kind of law elsewhere in the country!?
These guys are cunts. They should be made (from their own pockets) to fork out the difference in cost between a non-landscaped building, anda landscaped on.
Naturally if they all pool their expendable income for about 3 years, they might come up with the money for the first building's difference.
Stupid dickheads. Nearly all other authoritarian type laws at least try to pass themselves off as 'safety' issues. This is such a load of crap.
Posted by: Ken on February 27, 2004 05:03 PMFor so long, people have been telling me that atheism is really discomforting, and I really couldn't understand why. Seemed awesome. Now I'm almost depressed that there isn't a hell.
Posted by: Erik on February 28, 2004 12:33 PMKen, from what I could tell, one of the reasons why these morons want to force Austin businesses to change their exterior aesthetics is, quite literally, "other cities are doing it!"
This town can be frustrating sometimes.
Ditto, Erik. I need to freshen up on my Dante...where do politicans go in Hell again???
Posted by: Drizz on March 2, 2004 08:43 AMThe fear of death is the beginning of slavery.
Posted by: Becker Michelle on June 30, 2004 12:59 PMIt certainly could be. Too bad the sentiment comes from a fucking robo-spammer.
Posted by: Drizz on June 30, 2004 02:15 PM