January 31, 2004
Money Blues; Thinking of Politics

Nope, I wasn't able to make it to Ushicon. Ain't got no money.

With my move into a new apartment, my finances changed pretty dramatically:

  1. My rent went from $500 a month to $545.
  2. My new apartment complex takes care of all utilities except for phone and electricity, tossing in extended cable TV for free.
  3. I dropped my DSL service.
  4. I got a raise, roughly equal to $200 extra a month.
  5. I dropped USAA as my automobile insurance carrier and picked up LiberyMutual instead, opting for automatic paycheck reductions to pay for it.
  6. And I broke up with my girlfriend.

All of these things have combined into a suddenly tight financial atmosphere. I've got to pay closer attention to what my money gets spent on so I don't actually go broke and into debt. The consequences of seriously screwing up aren't good. I left my parents' home years ago to live on my own and I don't intend on moving back.

It really is a simple equation. If I don't make enough money to cover what I want to buy, then I have to lower my buying expectations and alter my habits. I'll be buying Zeigen Bock rather than Fat Tire...grocery brand foods rather than national brands...stay home rather than go out...reluctantly not buy new music and see new movies...and almost religiously turn my lights and electric devices off when I don't need them.

It doesn't work that way with government, of course. Obviously, some jurisdictions do a better job with their balance books than others and when crunch time comes, they cut government jobs and reduce spending. I don't want to lump everyone together.

But the feeling I've gotten over the years regarding the federal government and state governments in general is that it is simply not even up for discussion to cut payrolls by any significant degree and almost anathema to cut social programs. Everyone pays lipservice to "reducing waste" and "cutting the fat" from budgets, but those are problems of a systemic nature to all organizations. Eliminating costly departments and the programs they oversee are my preferred methods of reducing government red ink.

Perhaps that's why I'm hesitant to ever run for office. I'm too much of a fundamentalist to get any serious level of voter support. Cloaking my ideas in digestible rhetoric might work, but that is deception and any opponents could just point to this very blog and reveal what I truely feel about the issues. There'd be no point in trying to hide my intentions: I'd do my best to put Grover Norquist's famous quote of "get [government] down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub" into actual practice.

In Austin, such a political stance is guaranteed to get you dead-on-arrival status.

Anyway, just pondering some things on this very nice Saturday afternoon.



Posted by Drizzten at January 31, 2004 04:14 PM

ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.

Comments

Lately, I've been considering the possibility of running for office when I'm considerably older. But, since we share the same unpopular politics, I wouldn't get elected either, unless everyone got smart, or I lied. I'm not investing too much in the former, so I've been considering whether it would be okay to lie, and then only serve one term. Heh. Or more if people realized what a great system it is.

Posted by: Erik on January 31, 2004 11:02 PM

Charles,

There was a time when the goal of the Libertarian Party was simply to draw attention to itself and its ideas, not to win elections. That's no longer the case.

I think that's a good strategy. The Socialist Party of America never won a significant election, but its ideas permeate both major Parties today.

It would not be a waste of time for you to run for office if your goal is to spread ideas about libertarianism.

Posted by: Jonathan Wilde on February 2, 2004 01:15 PM

Mr. Wilde, you are of course right. Given the hypersensitivity these days the Democratic Party has towards the budget deficit, it is concievable that a libertarian-minded fellow could elbow his way into the debate and offer our much cleaner and simpler solutions to a receptive audience. Especially with our stance on social freedom, such a message might actually gain traction in some places (like Austin).

For me, it comes down to using resources to chase after the best goal. Continue the spread of libertarian ideas by running in races we know we can't win is laudable. I guess it may be my "dammit we need to change things" nature that drives me towards wanting to win an election and actually having the political power to work with.

My patience with the situation today just seems to be wearing thin. :)

Posted by: Drizz on February 3, 2004 10:16 AM

I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.

Posted by: Denis JudeLaure on May 2, 2004 05:55 PM

Sometimes, even the spammers get one right.

Posted by: Drizz on May 3, 2004 08:19 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.

HTML formatting is disabled. However, you may post a raw URL as it will show up as a clickable link.

Comments are the property and responsibilty of the commenter.

I reserve the right to delete any comment I wish as this is my property you are commenting upon, but I'm pretty laid-back so it isn't likely to happen unless you are some psycho idiot jerk. Oh, and unless you have my permission to promote your good or service, you are wasting your time: unsolicited advertisements will result in comment deletion and URL banning. This blog ain't for you spammers or the crap you want to sell.


Dislike the format, layout, color, or having a hard time reading the text? Comment here and let me know what you think.

Remember info?



Back to the top