October 02, 2003
Quickies...

  • I went to the 5th anniversary of the Liberty Dollar tonight. Great bunch of people. It was held at Thai Tera Restaurant on 6th. Bernard von NotHaus (the Liberty Dollar's principle creator), Michael Badnarik (a Libertarian candidate for President), Pat Dixon and Rick McGinnis (chair & vice chair of the Travis County Libertarian Party), and several other important folks were present for the Thai buffett, live music, and raffle. I bought (for only $5) the first-run edition of The Liberty Dollar: Solution to the Federal Reserve and Mr. NotHaus subsequently signed it. I also bought a commemorative t-shirt and requested a $5 silver Liberty Dollar piece as change for my $20 Federal Reserve note. The book promises to be very interesting reading.

  • I've been distantly following the Wilson/Plame/Bush White House scandal. Bush had better make the investigation transparent, thorough, and honest. *cough* We'll see. When The Washington Times and Newsmax start getting fiesty, it's time for the Administration to take things seriously. Certainly more seriously than National Review has been.

  • Congradulations to the Free State Project. It picked New Hampshire for the target state to move into and peacefully reform.
    Free State Project picks New Hampshire

    1. Group aims to recruit 20,000 liberty-minded individuals to move
    2. Membership vote selects NH out of ten candidates for planned migration
    3. Free Staters hope to reinforce, enhance "sphere of individual liberty" in the Live Free or Die state
    4. Project has earned backing of NH governor, some state legislators
    5. Trickle of early movers expected to start this year
    Aiming to preserve one bastion of freedom in the age of intrusive government, members of the rapidly growing Free State Project (FSP) have made a crucial decision. Voting via mail-in ballot after months of feisty debate, Free Staters chose New Hampshire as their future home.

    Founded in 2001, the FSP's goal is to concentrate 20,000 liberty-oriented voters in one state. There, it is hoped, they will work to enhance and extend its existing culture of liberty. But until this week, it was anyone's guess whether that state would be Montana, Wyoming, Delaware, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine, Idaho, North Dakota, South Dakota, or Alaska.

    The membership election took place through the innovative Condorcet's Method, which allowed voters to rank all states and selected the state that received a higher ranking than each other state from a majority of voters. The runner-up state was Wyoming, which defeated every other state but fell to New Hampshire by the decisive margin of 55 per cent to 45 per cent.

    "New Hampshire is clearly the consensus choice of Free Staters," commented FSP President and Yale political science professor Jason Sorens. "New Hampshire won a plurality of first-preference votes from every region of the country except the West."

    "It's not difficult to see the reasons for New Hampshire's victory," adds Vice-President Elizabeth McKinstry, who is originally from New England. "The state boasts the lowest state and local tax burden in the continental U.S., the leanest state government in the country in terms of government spending and employment, a citizen legislature, a healthy job market, and perhaps most important, local support for our movement."

    Over 100 New Hampshire residents have signed up for the Free State Project already, willing to move elsewhere but hoping to bring the movement to their home state. Governor Craig Benson even pledged to support the aims of the FSP, and several members of the legislature have signed up as members.


    My hat is off to them and I wish the group success. Related Hit & Run, Samizdata, Agitator, Unqualified Offerings, and Jesse Walker posts.

    UPDATE(10/9/2003 10:02pm)
    Claremont is the first target:

    The Libertarian Party has chosen Claremont as the major municipality in which to focus its Free State Project, the chairman of the state party said.

    The plan is to have some 20,000 people sign up to move to New Hampshire by 2006 and to have those people actually move to the state within the next five years, John Babiarz said.

    Claremont was chosen as the primary city because of its relatively small size and its potential for economic growth, Babiarz said.

    "We think that Claremont has an undervalued economy and we like to look at things in the long term," he added. "Cities like Manchester, Nashua and Portsmouth might be too big for us to really make a difference. But Claremont is smaller, so we would not be drowned out."



    Posted by Drizzten at October 02, 2003 01:50 AM
  • ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
    To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.

    Comments
    Post a comment
    Name:


    Email Address:


    URL:


    Comments:


    ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
    To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.

    HTML formatting is disabled. However, you may post a raw URL as it will show up as a clickable link.

    Comments are the property and responsibilty of the commenter.

    I reserve the right to delete any comment I wish as this is my property you are commenting upon, but I'm pretty laid-back so it isn't likely to happen unless you are some psycho idiot jerk. Oh, and unless you have my permission to promote your good or service, you are wasting your time: unsolicited advertisements will result in comment deletion and URL banning. This blog ain't for you spammers or the crap you want to sell.


    Dislike the format, layout, color, or having a hard time reading the text? Comment here and let me know what you think.

    Remember info?



    Back to the top