May 21, 2003
No UT Tuition Deregulation

Previously, I mentioned how some legislators were pushing to free some aspects of the University of Texas's tutition system in order to allow each university to set their own rates. Unfortunately, the idea gathered a bit of steam but has now been announced "dead" (links rot after a day):

Although a House sponsor is holding out slim hope that it can be resuscitated, the ambitious plan to deregulate undergraduate tuition and let Texas universities set their own rates appeared dead Tuesday.

"It's gone," said Sen. Florence Shapiro, R-Plano, chairwoman of the Senate Education Committee. "There's no semblance of deregulation left."

The Senate panel passed House Bill 3015, allowing limited tuition deregulation for graduate programs but none for undergraduates. Even though the House had already diluted the measure, supporting deregulation for only one year, the Senate panel watered it down more, rejecting any tuition-setting freedom.


Dammit, that sucks. No one other than the people who run the colleges know best what the costs are per student and how much should be paid for each hour/class.
Instead of deregulating tuition, lawmakers have decided to study the issue. They also are poised to allow universities to increase tuition by as little as $8 and as much as $23 a credit-hour. The exact increase was left pending until the Legislature completes the state budget.

[...]

Larry Faulkner, president of the University of Texas, said he was not surprised by deregulation's demise.

"In the end, it would be better for the state to head in that (deregulation) direction," he said.


Politics gets in the way, as usual.
Early in the legislative session, unshackling universities and letting them set their tuition looked like a viable option to offset cuts of as much as $1 billion in the two-year budget.

Craddick was among the state's leaders who supported the move. But lawmakers quickly developed cold feet about turning over their power to set tuition to boards of regents.

Sen. Royce West, D-Dallas, chairman of the Senate Higher Education subcommittee, said he wanted universities to prove they were meeting state goals of increasing enrollment by 500,000 by 2015 and were educating a growing number of minorities before giving them a freer rein.

[...]

Students, largely from UT, testified at several legislative hearings, begging lawmakers to keep their tuition-setting prerogative.

They said regents were appointed and thus were not accountable to voters.



Posted by Drizzten at May 21, 2003 11:11 PM

ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.

Comments

In return for House support of the Senate's budget proposal to add 500 million dollars more for state universities than the House had envisaged, Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst agreed to muster votes for a tuition deregulation proposal the House is expected to send to the Senate.

"This has nothing to do with balancing the budget," Dewhurst said Monday. "We have agreed to pass whatever the House passes on deregulation."

www.utwatch.org/oldnews/aas_dereg_5_27_03.html

Posted by: Tom Craddick on June 1, 2003 01:23 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.

HTML formatting is disabled. However, you may post a raw URL as it will show up as a clickable link.

Comments are the property and responsibilty of the commenter.

I reserve the right to delete any comment I wish as this is my property you are commenting upon, but I'm pretty laid-back so it isn't likely to happen unless you are some psycho idiot jerk. Oh, and unless you have my permission to promote your good or service, you are wasting your time: unsolicited advertisements will result in comment deletion and URL banning. This blog ain't for you spammers or the crap you want to sell.


Dislike the format, layout, color, or having a hard time reading the text? Comment here and let me know what you think.

Remember info?



Back to the top