April 03, 2003
HB 2465 Gaining Steam

Updating my previous post...

HB 2465 has jumped from wallowing in committee to "reported favorably as substituted" by the Public Education Committee.

To the uninitiated:


The bill would create a scholarship program for public school students to attend private schools. It defines eligibility of students to include only a subset of students in certain large school districts that have more than 40,000 students enrolled and have a majority of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunches. To be eligible, the students must be from a family with income no more than 200% of the level that qualifies for the free or reduced lunch program, resides in an eligible district, and attended a public school in the preceding full semester.

The scholarship amount is the total state and local funding for maintenance and operations per student in the preceding school year from all sources excepting the available school fund, federal funds and the special education allotment. The Comptroller is charged with establishing rules for distribution of payments for both public and private schools. The Comptroller issues a scholarship certificate to the parents of an eligible child, which may only be redeemed by a participating private school. The Comptroller is charged with distributing the per capita allocation to the district of residence, 10% of the scholarship amount to the district of residence, and 90% of the scholarship (or a lesser amount) to the private school.

Private schools must test students annually either with the TAKS test or a norm-referenced instrument, and must publish the aggregate results. School districts must provide eligible children transportation to the public school they would have attended. Students attending private schools on scholarship must be counted in the attendance of the district of residence.

Beginning in 2006, any school district may opt into the program.



Posted by Drizzten at April 03, 2003 07:23 PM

ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.

Comments

Interesting... my previous post is missing.

Posted by: zip code on February 10, 2004 05:21 AM

That's because it had no relevance to the post I made so therefore I deleted it. I suggest you re-read the little disclaimer-legalese below the comment box to find out why.

Posted by: Drizz on February 10, 2004 08:01 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.

HTML formatting is disabled. However, you may post a raw URL as it will show up as a clickable link.

Comments are the property and responsibilty of the commenter.

I reserve the right to delete any comment I wish as this is my property you are commenting upon, but I'm pretty laid-back so it isn't likely to happen unless you are some psycho idiot jerk. Oh, and unless you have my permission to promote your good or service, you are wasting your time: unsolicited advertisements will result in comment deletion and URL banning. This blog ain't for you spammers or the crap you want to sell.


Dislike the format, layout, color, or having a hard time reading the text? Comment here and let me know what you think.

Remember info?



Back to the top