Remarks becoming more religious in nature
"I welcome faith to help solve the nation's deepest problems," President Bush told a convention of religious broadcasters last week.Earlier, in his State of the Union address, he said, "The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, it is God's gift to humanity."
[...]
Speaking to the broadcasters in Nashville, Tenn., last week about the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Bush said, "We carried our grief to the Lord Almighty in prayer."
Hours after the shuttle Columbia disintegrated, Bush turned to religion and a quote from the book of Isaiah to help console the nation.
[...]
Expressions of faith and values are familiar ground for American presidents, and this one, who became a born-again Christian in the 1980s after concluding he was drinking too much, is no exception. Yet lately, Bush has gone beyond his usual broad remarks on the power of faith in general to use language and ideas specific to Christianity.
"This president is using general references and, beyond that, terminology and vocabulary that come straight out of a very particular religious tradition, which is evangelical Christianity," said the Rev. C. Welton Gaddy, a Louisiana pastor and executive director of the Interfaith Alliance Foundation, an umbrella interfaith group."I think his rhetoric implies a lack of appreciation for the vast pluralism of religion in this nation," Gaddy said.
Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said Bush speeches have started sounding "more and more like a sermon in a church" and risk alienating significant chunks of his constituency.
"When presidents start to become theologians on a regular basis, they begin to exclude people from their audience," Lynn said.
Mr. Lynn should avoid the superficial issue of how many people like Bush for his religious views and focus on matters of government establishment, endorsement, or repression of religion.
ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.
I've noticed those too. In fact I was appalled at those comments when they wormed their way into the post 9-11 speeches. Religion was the last thing that the American people needed at that point especially after what it had caused. If Hussein and Il Jong are supposed to be the enemy, why am I more afraid of Bush than I am them? That may just be me though.
Posted by: Dan Morris on February 19, 2003 11:19 PMIf Bush had really wanted to end terrorism, he would have sent special forces out against training camps and he would have found ways to cut funding to groups. As well, he wouldn't be best friends with the Saudis, who are huge terrorist producers and general all around oil mogul badguys. I believe he's playing to his religious supporters for votes and for his delusions of knowing and being a part of the "divine plan". He nuts.
Posted by: Sean Hugate on October 25, 2004 05:44 PM