Is it April Fools' in December? What's up with this?
Woman files lawsuit against President
Margie Schoedinger of Missouri City, Texas has filed a lawsuit against George W. Bush in Fort Bend County Court. In her suit she is alleging "race based harassment and individual sex crimes committed against her and her husband." The suit lists numerous offenses and asks for actual damages, punitive damages and judgments against George W. Bush.In her suit, among the many allegations, she has stated, "On or about, October 26, 2000, an attempt was made to abduct Plaintiff (Schoedinger) by three unknown assailants. Because of the actions of these assailants, Sugar Land police officers were dispatched to the scene. In the end, no report was taken. The assailants were treated respectfully and allowed to go free while Plaintiff (Schoedinger) was repeatedly and aggressively questioned. After filing a lawsuit, the Plaintiff?s family and past contacts were questioned and harassed." As a result, Plaintiff dismissed Plaintiff?s lawsuit. Irrespective of Plaintiff dismissing the lawsuit, the harassment continued." Schoedinger, goes on to allege "at some point, she contacted the Houston office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, filing a raced based harassment complaint, advising that the Sugar Land Police Department may or may not be harassing Plaintiff on behalf of her neighbors in Sugar Land or possibly on behalf of the First Colony Community Services Association."
Schoedinger further states in her lawsuit, "The (FBI) agent in question advised her that the situation appeared to be highly organized and most likely higher level, such as a racist organization." Furthermore she states, "Throughout this conversation, she learned that there was no time that the Defendant (Bush) ever stopped watching Plaintiff?, nor did he stop having sex with Plaintiff. The sole concern of the Defendant and his representatives was whether Plaintiff could actually recall whether Plaintiff could actually recall, the individual sex crimes committed against Plaintiff and Plaintiff?s husband, utilizing drugs.
Section VII of the lawsuit states; "Whether or not Plaintiff?s husband was raped remains in question, as Plaintiff was drugged after she was raped and her husband was drugged before her rape. Plaintiff can only state that these men purported to be FBI agents raping her for the purpose of covering for how many times they had drugged her and allowed the Defendant to rape her in the same manner."
It became known that a resident of Missouri City, Texas, Margie Schoedinger, filed a lawsuit against the former governor of Texas and the current president of the United States. PRAVDA.Ru has the complete text of Schoedinger?s petition at its disposal.In her suit, Margie Schoedinger states that George W. Bush committed sexual crimes against her, organized harassment and moral pressure on her, her family members and close relatives and friends. As Schoedinger said, she was strongly recommended to keep her mouth shut. In addition to that, three unknown men attempted to kidnap her on October 26, 2000.
According to Margie Schoedinger, Sugar Land police officers arrived at the scene of the crime. However, they treated kidnappers respectfully and let them go, while Margie and her family members were questioned rather aggressively. Eventually, the police made her dismiss her own lawsuit. Yet, the harassment continued in spite of the lawsuit dismissal.
The frightened American woman went to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Yet, FBI Houston Office agents took on the same demeanor as Sugar Land police officers. One of them told the lady that everything was highly organized.
Margie Schoedinger does not know, to which extent her husband might suffer from that sexual harassment. Whether or not her husband was raped remains in question. As Margie Schoedinger alleges, both she and her husband were drugged after she was raped. She can only state that ?those men purported to be FBI agents raping her for the purpose of covering for how many times they had drugged her and allowed the Defendant (George W. Bush) to rape her in the same manner.?
As a result of all that, pregnant Margie Schoedinger was hospitalized. She had a miscarriage. As she says, George W. Bush was the father of the lost child. Furthermore, she alleges that George Bush ordered to show pressure on her to the point, when she commits suicide. Margie Schoedinger?s husband was fired from work. Her husband has been unable to find any job since then. He does not get the federal unemployment allowance either. Later, Margie Schoedinger learned that both police officers and FBI agents acted like that at the behest of the defendant, incumbent President George W. Bush.
Is this a joke?
UPDATE (12/14 10:11am):
Indymedia now has the story.
UPDATE (12/17 12:31am):
"Unsubstantiated report goes online prematurely"
A news report about a court filing by a Missouri City, Texas, woman who claims President Bush raped her was posted on the Internet prematurely and without sufficient fact-checking, says the editor of the paper.The story, published Wednesday by the Fort Bend Star, said Margie Schoedinger also claims that Bush conspired with the FBI and local police to cover up his alleged crime.
"This report wasn't supposed to go up yet," Jean Sandlin, an editor for the paper, told WorldNetDaily. Speaking of Schoedinger, Sandlin added: "I had heard she was a nutcase."
[...]
Upon further investigation, however, WorldNetDaily discovered that indeed Schoedinger filed court papers with the Fort Bend County court Dec. 2 alleging the sexual abuse.
According to her account, which was confusing, rambling and incomplete, she also alleged that she has been harassed and threatened by federal agents, her bank accounts looted, her husband fired from his job, and that she had a miscarriage after being beaten. In court papers, she intimated that Bush "might have been the father of the child that was lost."
UPDATE(4/5/2003 1pm)
This website has a mirror of this post.
UPDATE(11/11/2003 8:31am)
As D.Kaylor said, Margie Schoedinger has indeed passed away. The Houston Chronicle carried her obituary, but their archives go back only one month. At least according to Radio Left. Additional commentary (from a progressive Democrat perspective) on the Bartcop forum.
ATTENTION: Comments are closed. You are viewing my old blog, archived for search engine purposes.
To view the new blog, please go to the homepage. To find the current version of this entry, search here.
After talking with the county clerk in Fort Bend, their website is www.co.fort-bend.tx.us -- go to that website, click on quick links, go to county clerk -- when that appears, go to the blue box on the left, scroll down to Index -- click on that, then click on civil suits. Put in Schoedinger in the plaintiff's box and hit search -- she's sued the Sugarland police, the officers, and that case has been remanded to District Court -- HOWEVER, in that suit she made absolutely NO MENTION of rape, beatings, miscarriage and/or President Bush. This woman is certifiable.
Posted by: Daisi on February 14, 2003 04:22 PMI, for one, believe Margie Schoedinger. George W Bush has a lengthy criminal arrest record, has been thrown in jail for DWI, Petty Larceny Etc. He is also a pathological liar, very capable of terrorizing an individual to the point of insanity. He has trashed our media with intimidation, he has destroyed our domestic economy. This guy is a psycho.
Margie's story may look crazy, but I think Bush is crazy. He would have gone to jail in the 90's for insider trading felonies at Harken Oil Company had his daddy not been president to cover up the SEC investigation.
Also, Bush went AWOL in the Texas Air Guard in the early 70's, and was at the P.U.L.L. Center in Houston in 1972 for reasons unknown. At the time, the P.U.L.L. Center in Houston was a community based inner city not-for-profit organization designed, in part, for law breakers to work off court mandated community service hours. Most maintain Bush's stay there was an exchange for expunging a cocaine arrest.
Bush has a propensity toward crime, and even Tammy Phillips, Austin Stripper, made similar allegations about Bush to Larry Flynt in 1999. Again, the Bush Gestapo discredited Tammy and buried the scandal.
The man is a psychopath, and I believe Margie. Remember, he's an alcoholic and a multiple arrested lawbreaker.
Mt. Murphy, I find your characterization of Bush as outlandish and baseless as the GOP's vilification of Clinton.
An arrest record for low-level crimes doesn't predetermine one for as a future rape perpetrator. Similarly, being "very capable" of hounding an individual doesn't mean anything. All of us are qute capable of terrorizing others. Bush gets softballs from the media when he bothers to accept questions at all...he hasn't intimidated them into submission. The NY Times and Helen Thomas being the most prominent counter-examples to your statement. Your point about the economy is worthy of debate, but I don't consider it a fact that Bush is responsible for our current economic state of affairs.
He certainly doesn't have any military record worth spotlighting, he's got a crappy business record, and he a former drug user/alcoholic. The military record is unimportant to me and the business record could be better. The drug/alcohol thing is such an ad hominem point that it isn't worth bringing up...shouldn't we be giving former addicts a second chance? What matters now is how he's doing, but I have a good idea you wouldn't agree with him there either.
Until I see or hear about EVIDENCE of this alleged act, it remains alleged, and barely so.
Personally, the one I'd call a "psychopath" is the one who lets his visceral hatred of someone get in the way of his rational faculties. But don't let that stop you. :)
Posted by: Drizz on February 26, 2003 05:37 PMIt doesn't matter who is or isn't "psychopathic" or "certifiable". It doesn't matter whether or not the case has any merit. We have precident in the Paula Jones case -- this HAS to be closely examined, the president HAS to be deposed and, if he is found to be covering anything up (whether it's related to this or not) he HAS to be impeached.
Where are the liberal media when we need them?
Posted by: Brady Flowers on April 4, 2003 11:23 AMGo to hell Drizz, Murphy is right!!
And he didn't even touch on the rest of the Bush Clan criminals. Remember Neal Bush; who raped, pillaged and plundered the Silverado savings and loan at the expense of tax payers and caused the fall of the savings and loan indusrty?
Why did he get away with that? Could it be because Daddy saved his ass too?
I've lived in Texas all my life and I can tell you, I know GWs type. It is no myth, he is a swaggering macho guy, quite capable of everything Margie Schoedinger has alledged.
And Dixie Chick, Natalie Maines, had it right; Texas women are, sick of his type. I too am embarassed that Bush is from Texas!!
Debra, perhaps you missed 90% of my last post...the parts the directly deal with what Mr. Murphy claimed. When you have the energy to spend addressing them rather than ranting about how nasty you think the Bushes are, please feel free to return.
Posted by: Drizz on July 14, 2003 11:38 PMU.S. media still REFUSES to mention Bush sexual assault lawsuit. A Texas woman, plaintiff Margie Denise Schoedinger, continues to pursue a lawsuit she filed against George W. Bush alleging that the White House inhabitant sexually assaulted her. If Schoedinger had filed a lawsuit against Clinton, do you think the story would be at least mentioned in every U.S. media outlet from Maine to Hawaii to Alaska to Florida? I’d bet my mortgage on it. Can you say mainstream media double standard, once again? -- the court document -- http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/imgcache/CCCIVIL217038-1-7.pdf -- http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/imgcache/CCCIVIL217041-1-1.pdf
to daisi: I followed your directions. The website you gave for the clerks office does not exist. Thus, please explain how you know that Ms
Schoedinger did not mention bush?
I would like to know WHY did George Bush pick out Margie Schoedinger as the victim. Surely there must be other single women he could of attacked? But I do believe that this has occured to her as the aftermath of adusive behavior and intimidation towards the people in her life is the evidence of such as action.
A friend of mine follwed the internet directions given on the Schoendinger suit and found it to be accurate. I have no problem believing anything about Bush, based on his performance both before he was president and his present course.
Whether thre is any merit to the suit or not is beside the point. The point is that no major or even minor media source has reported the suit's existance. Facism may have established itself so well at this juncture that it is too late to take the airwaves back
I find it interesting that none of the links go to the story or the report. I followed the instructions for the Fort Bend County website, as well as extensive exploration outside those instructions and find no method to access civil suit records (through county court or civil court) outside of a direct phone call to the numbers provided, no links to review online. Those who say they have seen the county report are either lying, or (gulp) Bush's long reach has changed how the county website provides its public information. Hmmm...
Posted by: Shelly on September 7, 2003 07:19 PMHow hard could it be...
The site works, the images of the documents filed are there, case 22127, filed 12/3/2002, Judge Lowery. Apparently last action was that judge sent it back to the clerk because "Service is required before taking action."
http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/court/courtDetails.asp?cur=civil&scur=Details&num=22127&pg=&ms=0
This is what happens folks when you allow a forum to someone like Juanita Broderick claiming Clinton raped her without a shred of evidence to back it up. Look for these claims by one side ofr the other regardless of who is president. The Right wing CRACKERS lowered the bar with Clinton to where we will never go back to respecting the office of President even enough to demand proof of ANYTHING every again.
AMERICA IS SICK AND TIRED OF LEFT AND RIGHT WING EXTREMISM!!! LET'S TAKE BACK AMERICA!!! ELECT GENERAL WESLEY CLARK!!!
I prefer Howard Dean. Both experienced and tough. He'll need both to govern while the Repubs control the legislature.
Posted by: dja on October 4, 2003 06:21 PMMargie Schoedinger was buried Sept. 27, 2003.Please leave the family in peace and let this all go away.
Posted by: D.Kaylor on October 16, 2003 03:43 PMBush clan. Why are my "opinions" continuously vanishing? Answer please? Also, why are Any, who buck Bush and his, and his Rules, considered "nuts?" Me thinks, he uses the "nut" card too much, or when is convenient to do so? May I ask 'WHO' you are? Why, are YOU, taking some of my postings? Well damn't answer? Cat and mouse, but "You're the Mouse", not I! Got that?
Did Bush, help "pay" for Margies' funeral? Why, would he assault anyone, in such way - he has his Secret Weapon and Seductive at that, Laura, his wife? What's she know,about Bush affairs? Does she "condone" them? Aide him? Is she just "kept forever, in the dark?" On the "alleged" pregnancy, what? Bush trying for a dozen? Boys? What's the meaning, of the "cold-shoulder" treatment, Bush gives some, who've angered him? Media, should see, if, the Tammy Phillips gal, "is" still alive, or not? I mean, Blair of UK, had his Top Guy, commit suicide; his wife, claims, "he did not!"-Kelly? An awful lot, of suicides, to "cover" up, Government wrongdoing!!!!!! WE can't do that!
D. Kaylor, stated Margie Denise Schoedinger buried Sept. 27, 2003. Kaylor posted this, Oct. 16, 2003. What a shame, Bush won, again? Harassment, intimidation, and control? We can have control, but we must, "take it, from him and them", put in who we know, is Honest and Sincere, in concern for ALL, not just "lust" and "deviant" behaviors, we're hearing "far too much about" in our Politics? I can't tolerate a 'child' sicko, and wonder at times, if Bush, "is really one of the latter, also?" Sure was a "run on 5 yr. old girls, this year" in DHS Social Services, one being My 5yr. old Granddaughter, Bush, knows about! Does HE do anything, to help get Nessi home? No, it's not worth $$$$, to get her home; she's worth more, being elsewhere? Do not undertand? Children, taken, trafficked, sold, and traded-in the United States? Yes, this is a "lucrative" business, for Bush and his! He's smart, using the Lowest Govt. entities, to rake in the Extra $$$$$, to use, for whatever His heart desires. Well, my heart, says, "to Hell with Fed. $", just want Nessi home? Bush, won't even do this? He did Nessi????? How??? I know, but Like Margie, "if" say too much, death, intimidation, threats? Bro, died because of what HE knew-knew too much, on Texas, Bush, other?
You do have to be careful - the Bush card is, "make all who knock me", appear nuts? Good one, Georgey Boy. What's your Momma, got to say, about the rape business? Business, as usual? Reckon so! No brains, no compassion, no empathy-rock, hard, cold, empty?
Margie should have gotten her fame(though she didn't want publicity), like Lewinski? Don't understand the difference in Bush regime, and Clintons' comfy oval office? Did Bush, also "abduct Margie and hubby?" Will hubby, "speak out" or just let this Personal assault go?
Posted by: Laura Morseth on October 27, 2003 05:49 AMMs. Morseth, no one here is removing your comments or postings. I have no idea what you're talking about on that issue.
As for just about everything else: Calm the hell down and use sentences that center around complete thoughts. I can hardly grasp whatever points you may be making in the midst of your rambling off-topic accusations. Try again and I'll begin to take you seriously.
Posted by: Drizz on October 27, 2003 01:27 PMThe woman who filed a sexual assault lawsuit against Bush last year died in September -- see link to obit below. The Harris County Medical Examiner's office lists her cause of death as a "gunshot wound to the head" and "suicide." So it doesn't matter anymore.
Or does it? David Kelly anyone?
Paper: Houston Chronicle
Date: Saturday 09/27/03
Section: A Edition: 3 SCHOEDINGER
MARGIE D. SCHOEDINGER expired Monday, 9/22/03 . Visitation: Friday, 9/26/03 , 7 to 9pm, McCoy & Harrison Chapel. Funeral Service: Saturday, 9/27/03 , 1:30pm, McCoy & Harrison Chapel. Interment, Houston Memorial Gardens.
The man sacrifices children to a pagan god at bohemian grove and vacations with the bin laden's. nuff said.
Posted by: InTheKnow on November 14, 2003 02:29 AMWHO WANTS THE TOXIC TEXAN ANYHOW?
Posted by: James A. Barkie Sr. on November 16, 2003 09:48 AMIf you would be unloved and forgotten, be reasonable.
Perceptions do not limit reality.
The method to reach the documents that started this thread was pretty poor.
I spent some time and did come up with this link from the county clerk's page. There are actually two cases filed by Ms. Schoedinger. Here is an excerpt cut and pasted from the web page:
Case Number: 22127
Date Received: 12/03/2002
Case Type: Injury or damage other than a motor vehi
Plaintiffs
SCHOEDINGER MARGIE
Defendants
BUSH GEORGE W
Here are the links you can find the information in:
Go to this page and enter Schoedinger in the 'Name'field. You will find both cases come up. You can download various court documents from either case in pdf format from here.
Again, while I did not vote for bush, I do support the actions in iraq. I am a person seeking the truth.
One is innocent until proven guilty. That's what we base our civilization around. Let's not forget it. Use the info. Draw your own conclusions.
joe
http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/search.asp?cabinet=civil
http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/imgcache/civil1987591-1-4.pdf
Posted by: Joe on December 9, 2003 12:39 PMI haven't seen any recent updates about Margie.
She died of a gunshot wound to the head.
Of course, it was listed of suicide, but mental health experts will tell you, women don't normally kill themselves with guns.
It's usually pills or other means. Guns aren't the normal mode of suicide by women.
Of course, if men killed her, they would use a gun shot to the head, since that's the suicide method of choice by men.
Margie is dead and no one has questioned this story.
Juanita Broderick, who accused Pres. Clinton of rape, is very much alive.
Those who are seeking information about Margie Schoedinger and are not simply seeking a forum to voice their opinion on the subject aimlessly and mindlessly can visit: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1284
And I must say, it is believable simply because the media, who chews everything to the bone and reports on nothing newsworthy ad nauseam, failed to report the story! That is a classic case of cover-up and conspiracy! If you believe the Bush administration is incapable of wrongdoing, get your hands on a copy of the film, 'The Revolution Will Not Be Televised', the failed coup of Hugo Chavez! It clearly shows the lengths Bush will go to, to get what he wants and in this case, he wanted the 4th largest producer of oil in the world -- Venezuela! Sound familiar?
Bush, who daily rapes a country whose election he stole, is now incapable of raping Margie Schoedinger? That's not only not humorous...it's sad to think anyone who will NOT believe it bases that opinion on Bush's history!! Here's an interesting look at the legitimate election of Hugo Chavez taken from: http://www.satyamag.com/jan04/palast.html
"Mr. Bush has quite a different idea of democracy than the ‘Chavistas’ in the red T-shirts. Elections don’t necessarily figure into Bush’s picture of democracy. The White House once said that Chavez’s winning a crushing majority of the vote in his 2000 election did not confer “legitimacy” on Chavez’s presidency. Hmmm."
Need I say more!?
Posted by: Socalswazigal on February 22, 2004 01:25 PMI just got finished reading the documents in the clerks office which are viewable. It looks like well before the suicide of Margie she was ordered by the court to a "mediation" prior to the case going to trial but did not respond to the court nor to the defendant, GWB.
I for one am open to any valid claims against anyone no matter their reputation but when a person files a claim but fails to have a mediator hear the case personally. She died 3yrs later. That to me would be plenty of time to attend a mediator hearing if she had any validity to her claims.
Posted by: robert lawrence on May 18, 2004 06:00 PMIt is all too easy to believe. Lord knows he flaunts the law. What is the word on the allegations out of Washington. I heard that it dealt with fondling sometime in April. I thought that story would be big news - but it died quickly.
Posted by: Paul on May 23, 2004 09:08 PMI find all of this really surprising about the Margie Case and Lawsuit if President Bush Did do this than I truly believe that he needs to be held accountable for his actions and the pain and tourment that he caused this lady and her family. I mean this women
owned 5 businesses Margie did not sound off her rocker to me, but rather a tortured rape vicitim crying out for help! Poor Lady, if in fact that this did truly happen to her than she needs justice! The president is no different than us, we as the american people, he is not above the law. We as the people elect our President, the president does not elect us!
Justice we need justice!
This is the first time that I am posting here.
Hi.
I look forward to posting many messages here, reading great messages, and having great discussions here.
THANK YOU,
JOHN.
ceo93@hotmail.com
I would not at all be surprised if this were true.
George W. Bush is a man with a checkered past. He was in Skull and Bones, he snorted kilos of cocaine, Larry Flynt said that he had two people who were willing to come forward and confirm a story about George W. Bush getting a Mexican girl pregnant in 1970, or sometime in the early 1970's, and then helping her to get an abortion. The two people were a friend of the Mexican girl's, and the doctor who performed the abortion. It was only the Mexican girl herself who did not want to come forward, for whatever reason. Then there is also the report about the blond former Playboy Playmate who worked at an Austin club, and who Bush was having an affair with. Bush broke off the affair in 1999, right before he began running for President. Larry Flynt also may have contacted this woman as well. Then, of course, there is the close relationship between the Bush family and the Saudi Royal Family, and the close relationship between the Bush family and the Bin Laden family, and Osama Bin Laden's brother being one of George W. Bush's business parterns in the 1970's.
If you think the mainstream media has a "liberal bias", you need to think again.
THANK YOU,
JOHN.
ceo93@hotmail.com
Yeah, the media sure has a conservative/FASCIST (hahahahahahaha...you dems) bias because it won't report on the ramblings of a fucking psychopath.
Low Brokaw voice: "Tonight -- a woman who accused Bush of raping, drugging her, and placing her under 24-hour surveillance. And now she's dead. Wacko charges, or an elaborate CIA scheme? We'll investigate the charges, in a special one-hour edition of Nightly News."
Posted by: Eric on July 29, 2004 06:06 AMI'm really shocked (well, maybe not) at the sheer shrillness and ranting of the lefties here. Look, there are respectable lefties who disagree completely with Bush on policy and want to see him defeated. And then there's wacko anarchist kids who live in their parents' basement and will believe in any shit slung against Bush.
Posted by: Eric on July 29, 2004 06:19 AMThe question isnt 'if' he raped her or 'if' he had her silenced....
The 'real' question here is why it got no media play... even if only to discredit her against the lawsuit that was reaching trial phase before she was 'suicided'... the last reporter that talked to her didnt seem to say anything about her talking suicidal... she seemed reserved but not psycho...
Regardless, he's going to get away with it if he did it and there's nothing we can do about it now....
Posted by: Realist on August 10, 2004 01:49 AMEric, keep your head in the sand where it belongs. You're another guy who does nothing but name call. Lefties are anarchists now, too? I thought they were dirty commies.
The truth remains that this issue has not been examined by the mainstream media when it surely would have been during the Clinton years. We need to be asking why there is a change.
Posted by: Ericisanidiot on August 24, 2004 09:57 AMLeft or right it dosnt matter the fact is no one pick up this case but 1 mainstrem media source from which i have seen. This probally would have had the same result if clinton was president right now no mainstream news articles and an innocent person killed!! Left or Right it dosnt matter WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Mike on March 8, 2005 04:41 PMIt's intresting b.c i am actually writting a paper on this for school. Whether I think Bush actually did all of the things mentioned is questionable. However, I am honestly scared of how lightly this lawsuit is being taken. I do believe it should have been printed out in newspaper that everyone reads, so that everyone can learn the story. It does not mean he did it, but shouldn't we make sure. Don't you think it's important that this thing is looked out through and through? I really don't want to be living in a country where I am unsure if the president is a rapist. I WANT TO BE SURE...so please if you can do anything at all..make it happen..again I am not saying this is true..but I'd really like to know why this random person who Bush actually dated at one point in time killed herself on the notion that she was raped, sexually harrassed, and so on..
Posted by: dawn on March 27, 2005 01:16 PMMargie was no idiot. She was no coward. Margie believed she had constitutional rights. She believed the law was there to protect her. She didn't lose faith in her beliefs and she was helped and encouraged by others who shared her beliefs.
Unfortunately, she fell victim to people who have no regard for the constitution and no respect for the law. She was mercilessly hounded and humiliated, she sought help and was ignored.
Margie deserved to be heard, she deserved better treatment than she recieved from the state, from the government, from the courts, from the police, from the media, from her fellow citizens.
It is an offence to make frivilous accusations and waste court resources on false allegations. If Margie was insane, she would have been refered to state health authorities, if her claims were demonstrably false, she would have been charged for filing a frivilous suit. Margie's initial complaint against the Sugar Land Police in 2000 was logically consistent and plausible, the behaviour of the police was indeed worthy of complaint. Her treatment since then has clearly been extraordinary. I am surprised that this story has been so effectively buried and ignored.
Posted by: Ozzy Moron on April 13, 2005 02:00 AMI think there's something to Margie. The documents she filed are real. Bush's attorney was damn sure involved in this. I'm investigating this and will see where it goes.
Posted by: Chuck on August 25, 2005 04:26 PMThe accusations are true, the claims are real.
Posted by: Bodega Hwy on December 28, 2005 05:42 PMI have seen posts on many electronic forums
attacking bush. Sometimes they are left up until
many other defamatory posts in regard to him also
show up. Then most get deleted. Or there are other
posts like the ones from Drizz on this board which try to make anyone posting against bush appear to be mentally imbalanced. bush has a lot of people on his payroll, and I'm not talking about the government one.
This guy is an arch criminal and hails from a family of them. His great grandfather and grandfather both made their fortunes dealing with the Nazi's and helped to put Hitler into power.
bush's grandfather, Prescott had his bank seized in the early 1940's under the trading with the enemy act. In actuality his bank was laundering money the Nazi's stole from the Jews when they
arrested them and sent them to concentration camps.
As for Margie, she is just another victim of the bush crime family, and her husband is either too frightened to fight back (who could blame him given the power bush has) or has been paid off to keep silent.
I don't believe that Margie was crazy as the editor of the Fort Bend paper had alleged just to cover her own ass. I believe Margie was telling the truth, and that bush is not only a sociopathic and pathological liar, but also a
rapist and murderer. Margie's claim against bush
is not the first. Another woman accused bush or rape when he was in his twenties but was forced
by the bush clan to keep it quiet. She claimed that when bush was raping her and she tried to fight back that bush said "you deserve this so shut up." She said bush had tied her up so she was helpless and put a pillow over her face to keep her quiet.
I believe this woman. What is terrifying is that this psychopath is president of this country --
and stole both the elections he was in -- Ohio and
Florida -- The General Accounting Office is now
investigating fraud in the State of Ohio based on
complaints against bush in the 2004 election.
http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/Lyme/page700.html
Posted by: James F. Marino on February 6, 2006 04:57 PMMr. Marino, you have a serious reading comprehension problem if you honestly believe I have "[tried] to make anyone posting against bush appear to be mentally imbalanced." I've replied three times to comments within this post:
One was to object to Henry Louis Murphy's exaggerations.
The other two asked previous commenters to calm down, use clear English, and address actual arguments rather than visceral hatred. If anything, the people who are "defaming" anyone are you anti-Bush fanatics. Not that I'd defend the guy...
Believe in Margie's story all you want. It's possible she was telling the truth and it's possible Bush did the things she alleged. My opinion of the man is low enough to admit that.
Posted by: Drizz on February 7, 2006 08:46 AMTo Drizz:
I apologize to you for jumping to conclusions. I have seen many
accurate posts in regard to bush and his criminal history attacked by shills looking to discredit them. I just assumed that
you might be one. However, given your latest post, it is appears that you are not, and again apologize for making the assumption
James F. Marino
Posted by: James F. Marino on February 7, 2006 01:03 PMApology accepted and I appreciate your quick reply. There are a depressing number of Bush sycophants on the Internet and believe me, I am not one of them.
Posted by: Drizz on February 7, 2006 03:22 PM